Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers

What does any of that have to do with the actual science behind the vaccines, and the many honest researchers who developed it?

If we never try anything new and perhaps sometimes risky, we will never progress. (When Ben Franklin wanted his own family inoculated through this very new science, it was pretty controversial then, too.)

I asked a question some weeks ago to which I don’t believe I ever received a response:

We’ve often seen complaints that the whole FDA approval process is too expensive, takes too long, and is just another example of excessive bureaucracy and government control; and that it adds drastically to the costs of R&D and the ultimate costs - financial and otherwise - to the consumer.

What would you, or anyone else here who fears the ‘experimental’ nature of the vaccine, suggest as an appropriate protocol/time period before a drug or vaccine can be considered no longer ‘experimental’?


175 posted on 05/08/2021 8:05:55 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: Jamestown1630
What does any of that have to do with the actual science behind the vaccines, and the many honest researchers who developed it?

It's not about "Because SCIENCEā„¢!" like you've been brainwashed.

Only 1/7 of the country has ever even caught the virus; of those who have caught it, 5% of the people over age 70 with pre-existing conditions died; 0.5% (I think) of those age 60-70 have died; basically very few others have.

And don't forget the open exaggeration of deaths, and the thousands killed by Dem Governors putting COVID patients in nursing homes, totally ignoring the custom convalescent hospitals President Trump had the military set up, and ignoring the Navy Hospital ships.

And yet pretty much the entire country was locked down, and mRNA vaccines which have never before been tested on humans, were given EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION -- which is supposed to be only for DIRE CIRCUMSTANCES where there is no other available treatment.

Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine/Zinc do just fine if you give the to the patients early before the virus multiplies in the body.

But in the early days, patients who presented with weak clinical symptoms were sent home from the hospital.

And don't give me the lying crap about "OMG muh heroic overworked doctors risking their lives."

I've seen the TikTok videos too.

And now more and more medical personnel are speaking up that their careers were threatened if they spoke up about Ivermectin/HCQ; and doctors are being threatened if they don't push the mRNA with everything in them.

THIS IS NOT ABOUT SCIENCE.

Anyone who thinks or says it is, is a troll or a liar.

(Some of the 'trials' for these mRNA jabs are a joke. One of them published in the New England Journal of Medicine, involved a Phase 3 trial on monkeys. The total number of monkeys in (control + subjects) group, was 24.

That's not even a CNN pro-Biden push poll.

195 posted on 05/08/2021 8:32:03 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

To: Jamestown1630
Very progressive.


197 posted on 05/08/2021 8:39:18 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson