Posted on 05/02/2021 9:38:15 AM PDT by Lenora Thompson
These people are so self-righteous it isn’t even funny - and being exactly what they accuse others of being.
Which ones?
Today's?
Or tomorrow's, that are going to change today's?
You do realize that science cannot *prove* anything, don't you?
So today's science shows something to be true, and then tomorrow's changes that. Then what?
How's that ice age we were supposed to be in by the year 2000 working out?
Oh wait, by the year 2020 children will not know what snow is.
For that matter, today's high of 67 and sunny never panned out. Overcast here and rainy and in the upper 50's.
There's some science for you.
I’m getting sick and tired of mindless insults and accusations. Lies and distorted facts.
From both the pro and anti vaxxers here at Free Republic.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Agree.
If one wants to wear 3 or 4 masks, lock themselves in the basement, have everything delivered and demand a ‘proof of??’ from the deliverer, that is your choice and far be it from me to ‘insult’ or ridicule you.
OTOH
If I decide I do not want or need a shot or mask or isolation, that is my choice.
Sorry ‘both’ sides but it will take more than ‘this guy said’ or ‘that guy said’ and those that aqree/disagree take it to heart,
Just leave me be and I will let you be.
I still stand by the original consensus that everyone over 65(?) will have to isolate etc or die
that since the same government that told me that
is also trying to ‘advise’ me on speculative options
that since I did NOT hunker down and still alive and kicking at 81 with NO voluntary changes of my behavior, remain maskless, remain shotless etc etc etc
Que Sera Sera
Insane ramblings, and you POST them?
Dang Shedders!
“The only ones giving lies and distorted facts (on the heated threads, here on FR) are the pro-jab crowd.”
I didn’t know there was a “pro jab crowd” on FR.
I think the divide is far closer to anti vax vs those who would live and let live.
The anti vax crowd appears to be more virulent and confrontational. And the indifferent crowd enjoys antagonizing them.
But, not once have I seen somebody from the indifferent crowd condemn or ridicule anyone from the anti vax crowd because they would not get a vaccination.
All the ridicule is reserved for the sources they tend to cite, and the zealous frenzy...urgency even...with which the anti vax crowd tries to convince everyone else how these vaxes will destroy civilization or some such nonsense.
It’s Qtarded.
Roger, With all due respect some of us value debate, open discussions, freedom... What you consider “crappy” threads often end up having some good discussions and informative links (I just posted one). I don’t support censorship here—especially since so many other media sites are doing it so well.
You state: “Apparently, courtesy and decorum and decency no longer applies(sic) here.” Interestingly, IMHO they really seem to be most in short supply on posts by pro-vaccine Freepers. Ironically, I only need look at the first 2 posts...
BTW, if you are concerned about the appearance of the forum, posters have been asked not to use certain words—which you did 2x in your post.
Have a nice rest of your afternoon.
Almost all of your accusations against me, are far more applicable to the pro-jab crowd.
Give the exact link to the post where I went off on someone, this ought to be good. I can think of a case where a pro-jabber was trying to assure us of the tremendous background testing of the jabs, quoting a study done on a total of 24 monkeys. That is not a large enough count for meaningful statistics. There's a reason I make fun of the "Because SCIENCE!™" bullcrap. The Nobel-prize-winner who invented the PCR technique, said it was not meant for diagnosis.
I posted a link last night that the CDC changed their guidelines for use of the technique, in a way that increased cases early on, but would decrease them now that the narrative "Vaccinations *work*!™" requires it.
And my source for the supposition that this virus was bio-engineered includes Dr. Luc Montaigner, a Nobel-prize-winning virologist; he is joined today by the former head of Great Britain's MI6 Intelligence Agency.
You were saying?
Paid CDC vaccine navigator - here to promote Vax porn snd shape what is posted…
Wait... I thought this evil devil's brew was going to kill everyone.
Do dead people get vaxxed 10 to 12 times a year?
Well, for example, what you just posted to me.
You are truly an unhinged individual.
I’ve been told not to get the vaccine by my doctor.
—————————-
I don’t know where you stand on this issue but a higher authority advised me something is sinister and wrong/ bad about the jabs. As a believer in God and our savior Jesus, we ( many of believers I talk to ) believe the spirit of “ discernment” has been freely given to many believers and those listening will not take the jabs....all others, carry on in a world that has been corrupted in every single sector of government and society. My only advice is to pray hard and often when deciding what to inject into your body.
It's all about the narrative to them. If you don't want to get a vaccine, don't get one. If you don't want to get a vaccine, that doesn't make it necessary to lie about what the vaccine is and is not, what COVID is and is not, levy outrageous false attacks on those who have gotten them, etc. But that's all they do.
Yeah active duty for 27 yrs/Navy Carrier Jet pilot, sucks to be me. I just can sniff out turds and I smelled you a mile away. I don’t usually comment, but Patriots need to push back against people like you.
Look at ransomnote's posts.
I quote from peer-reviewed medical journals about the biomechanics of the vaccine.
And the pro-jab crowd blindly cut-and-paste and say "Muh SCIENCE!™" when they don't know what in hell they are posting or why, only that their masters have told them their job is to bully hobbits and bewildered Breeland peasants.
They deserve the flaming.
Here's my lightly-edited response to one who tried the "but muh science!" bull crap.
The basic underlying biology is irrelevant.
If there is enough clinical evidence (and there is) of adverse effects;
if there is enough evidence of prior malfeasance (and there is) by the manufacturers;
if there is enough evidence of projected deaths of COVID (and there is) being grotesquely exaggerated;
if there is enough evidence of cases being attributed to COVID without sufficient evidence (and there is);
if there is enough evidence of deaths being caused through negligence or worse on the part of high Democrat officials (and there is);
if there is enough evidence that top Democrats helped encourage contagion in their public speeches (and there is);
if there is enough evidence that the CDC screwed up testing kits early on (how CONVENIENT!) (and there is); if there is enough evidence of cheap, over-the-counter remedies being available but suppressed (and there is);
if there is enough evidence of people and groups with a past history in subjecting people to experimental vaccines, with severe adverse effects including infertility and death (and there is);
if there is enough evidence of some of the parties involved being over a billion dollars in debt, and therefore having every motive to lie and push a faulty treatment (and there is);
if there is enough evidence that Big Tech has helped censor news of bad side effects of the jabs (and there is);
if practicing doctors and other health care providers have spoken out in public about their careers being threatened if they went against the narrative (and there is);
then {their} attempting to (one MORE time) to try the old narrative "because SCIENCE!™" as though the opposition to these jabs were a bunch of drunken incestouous -- oh wait, {their} term now is "flat earthers" -- as though the opposition were due to (same thing they said about AIDS) "lack of education!" --
is another bald-faced lie, just like everything else {they}'ve ever said. {They} should have been banned as a troll and {their} IP address spammed, long ago.
Wrong verb tense. You said I had gone off, (which would refer to a past posting).
Instead, you claimed my response to your post, fulfilled something you claimed you were quoting *from the past*. ...yes, you. And the panda you rode in on.
This is exactly what these people are and there are a lot of them infecting Free Republic. I can’t hold my thoughts anymore. The propaganda machine is overwhelming.
Then of course there's this: https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3926279/posts With the usual suspects in the thread believing it is brilliant.
Hello, you lying piece of slime.
Look what you left out of your hit-piece trying to discredit the OP.
FDA LIST...
...of potential adverse event outcomes that can manifest after taking Covid-19 vaccination as of Jan 2021:
1. Guillain-Barré syndrome 2. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis 3. Transverse myelitis 4. Encephalitis 5. Myelitis 6. Encephalomyelitis 7. Meningoencephalitis 8. Meningitis 9. Encephalopathy 10. Convulsions aka Seizures 11. Generalized onset seizures 12. Stroke 13. Narcolepsy 14. Cataplexy 15. Anaphylaxis 16. Myocardial infarction aka Heart Attack 17. Myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) 18. Pericarditis 19. Autoimmune disease <-— AND IT WILL NEVER STOP. There’s no “off” switch except Death. 20. DEATH 21. Adverse Pregnancy and birth outcomes (miscarriages; breastfeeding babies poisoned by the milk) 22. Other Acute demyelinating diseases 23. Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions 24. Thrombocytopenia (too few platelets) 25. Disseminated intravascular coagulation (blood clots) 26. Venous thrombosis 27. Arthritis 28. Arthralgia (joint pain) 29. Kawasaki Disease
See that? They’re quoting the FDA.
Are you lying, or incompetent, that you left that part out?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.