Those who do not choose vaccination have an obligation to their fellow man to contract the disease.
“The only ones giving lies and distorted facts (on the heated threads, here on FR) are the pro-jab crowd.”
I didn’t know there was a “pro jab crowd” on FR.
I think the divide is far closer to anti vax vs those who would live and let live.
The anti vax crowd appears to be more virulent and confrontational. And the indifferent crowd enjoys antagonizing them.
But, not once have I seen somebody from the indifferent crowd condemn or ridicule anyone from the anti vax crowd because they would not get a vaccination.
All the ridicule is reserved for the sources they tend to cite, and the zealous frenzy...urgency even...with which the anti vax crowd tries to convince everyone else how these vaxes will destroy civilization or some such nonsense.
It’s Qtarded.
It's all about the narrative to them. If you don't want to get a vaccine, don't get one. If you don't want to get a vaccine, that doesn't make it necessary to lie about what the vaccine is and is not, what COVID is and is not, levy outrageous false attacks on those who have gotten them, etc. But that's all they do.
Look at ransomnote's posts.
I quote from peer-reviewed medical journals about the biomechanics of the vaccine.
And the pro-jab crowd blindly cut-and-paste and say "Muh SCIENCE!™" when they don't know what in hell they are posting or why, only that their masters have told them their job is to bully hobbits and bewildered Breeland peasants.
They deserve the flaming.
Here's my lightly-edited response to one who tried the "but muh science!" bull crap.
The basic underlying biology is irrelevant.
If there is enough clinical evidence (and there is) of adverse effects;
if there is enough evidence of prior malfeasance (and there is) by the manufacturers;
if there is enough evidence of projected deaths of COVID (and there is) being grotesquely exaggerated;
if there is enough evidence of cases being attributed to COVID without sufficient evidence (and there is);
if there is enough evidence of deaths being caused through negligence or worse on the part of high Democrat officials (and there is);
if there is enough evidence that top Democrats helped encourage contagion in their public speeches (and there is);
if there is enough evidence that the CDC screwed up testing kits early on (how CONVENIENT!) (and there is); if there is enough evidence of cheap, over-the-counter remedies being available but suppressed (and there is);
if there is enough evidence of people and groups with a past history in subjecting people to experimental vaccines, with severe adverse effects including infertility and death (and there is);
if there is enough evidence of some of the parties involved being over a billion dollars in debt, and therefore having every motive to lie and push a faulty treatment (and there is);
if there is enough evidence that Big Tech has helped censor news of bad side effects of the jabs (and there is);
if practicing doctors and other health care providers have spoken out in public about their careers being threatened if they went against the narrative (and there is);
then {their} attempting to (one MORE time) to try the old narrative "because SCIENCE!™" as though the opposition to these jabs were a bunch of drunken incestouous -- oh wait, {their} term now is "flat earthers" -- as though the opposition were due to (same thing they said about AIDS) "lack of education!" --
is another bald-faced lie, just like everything else {they}'ve ever said. {They} should have been banned as a troll and {their} IP address spammed, long ago.
Those who do not choose vaccination have an obligation to their fellow man to contract the disease.