Read post 5 and you’ll have your answer — dems hired a lawer who clerked(?) for the judge on the case thus recusing himself from the case due to possible conflict of interest/ethical concerns.
Unless the clerk/new lawyer advised the judge on matters related to this case ( which I seriously doubt), this is not grounds for recusal.
Something else is going on here.
Unless the clerk/new lawyer advised the judge on matters related to this case ( which I seriously doubt), this is not grounds for recusal.
Something else is going on here.