Posted on 04/19/2021 5:57:54 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Parler is back.
On the Apple App Store, that is.
Or, it will be.
You’ll no doubt recall a Big Tech move against the social media platform following January 6th’s chaos at the Capitol.
On the 9th, Apple removed the app from its store — despite it being the #1 download.
Apple has pulled Parler's smartphone app from its app store, following complaints that the far right-friendly social media platform was being used to “plan and facilitate yet further illegal and dangerous activities.” https://t.co/gTOQSRGF9n
— The Associated Press (@AP) January 10, 2021
Google yanked it from Google Play, and it was axed from Amazon’s servers.
NEW: Amazon is booting Parler off AWS, its web hosting service, knocking the pro-Trump social network offline until it finds a new host. https://t.co/zdR68ASJM2
— BuzzFeed News (@BuzzFeedNews) January 10, 2021
Parler attained new servers in February, with prominent shareholder Dan Bongino celebrating survival:
“Cancel culture came for us, and hit us with all they had. Yet we couldn’t be kept down. We’re back, and we’re ready to resume the struggle for freedom of expression, data sovereignty, and civil discourse. We thank our users for their loyalty during this incredibly challenging time.”
Along the path of that return, last month, congressional Republicans issued a letter.
Penned by Sen. Mike Lee (UT) and Rep. Ken Buck (CO), the March 31st missive to Google, Apple, and Amazon read (in part) thusly:
In just three days, Apple and Google effectively cut off Parler’s primary distribution channel, and Amazon cut off Parler’s access to critical computing services, leaving the company completely unable to serve its 15 million users. These actions were against a company that is not alleged to have violated any law. In fact, information provided by Parler to the House Oversight Committee revealed that Parler was assisting law enforcement even in advance of January 6th.
Thirty-three grilling questions followed.
Among them:
- Please provide the specific provisions of your policies resulting, where applicable, in suspension or expulsion from distribution channels (Apple App Store and Google Play Store) or termination of cloud service.
- Provide a complete history of all changes to policies that govern requirements for content moderation, including changes to definitions of what is acceptable and prohibited speech or conduct.
- How many businesses were reviewed in 2020? Of the businesses reviewed in 2020, how many were reviewed because of content moderation practices?
- How many were terminated?
- What triggers the review process? Are outside inputs such as news reports used in
decision making?- Who is involved during the review process? Is the process independent, or are all individuals participating in the review employees of the company?
- Is there an appeal process for businesses notified of suspension? If yes, please describe.
- List all businesses terminated/removed since 2017 as a result of content moderation policy violations, the date of their first notice and final termination/removal. How many of these businesses were in social media?
- Was Parler given notice of the potential violation? Was the same amount of time offered to Parler to cure any potential policy violations as is given to other potential violators?
- Who determined the amount of time, if any, provided for Parler to take remediation measures?
- What was the basis for suspension or removal given to Parler in the initial notice?
- Were there any contacts between any of your companies prior to the action against Parler? If so, with whom?
On Monday, Apple responded.
On March 31, @SenMikeLee and I sent a letter demanding answers about why Apple removed Parler from the App Store.
🚨Today, we received a response: Parler will be reinstated on the App Store. Huge win for free speech. pic.twitter.com/FQBDSSSFGk
— Congressman Ken Buck (@RepKenBuck) April 19, 2021
The tech giant asserted it “wants to provide a safe experience for users to get apps and a great opportunity for all developers to be successful.”
“Apple does this in part by curating the App Store,” it said, “including by reviewing apps to ensure compliance with all App Store Review Guidelines, which among other things set for standards for privacy safety, security, and performance of apps in the App Store.”
Apple claimed it reviews over “100,000 submissions per week, and [the company] rejects about 40% of them due to various Guidelines compliance issues.”
Before removing the app, Apple declared, it had communicated with Parler “regarding failures in [the site’s] content moderation efforts, as well as its desire stated at various times to not moderate content at all.”
Apps, its guidelines state, “should not include offensive or discriminatory content, including that which is likely to humiliate, intimidate, or harm a targeted individual or group.”
Apple specified it requires apps “with user-generated content” to provide the following:
- a method for filtering objectionable material from being posted to the app;
- a mechanism to report offensive content and timely responses to concerns;
- the ability to block abusive users from the service; and
published contact information so users can easily reach the developer.
Apple relayed it had determined Parler was in violation of some of its rules. Hence, on January 8th, it told the app to 86 certain content.
Per the explainer, Parler needed to follow up within 24 hours. But it “did not communicate a sufficient plan to improve its moderation of user-generated content in the app.”
Hence the booting.
On the other side of several purported conversations, April 14th saw approval for Parler to return to Apple’s store.
Therefore, it will be immediately available upon release.
As for coordinating with Amazon or Google, Apple denies any such collusion.
In January, some surely thought Parler had met its demise. Perhaps others assumed it would need to find some Apple-alternative path back.
In an age of swelling censorship, either of those may have easily turned out to be true.
But for now, it looks like Parler is on the rise.
It’s set to bear fruit — and with the help, or at least compliance, of Apple.
The only reason they are allowing it’s return is because they have neutered it. A secondary reason is they are alarmed by the fact that Gab is totally out of their control and they realized they desperately need an alternative.
It was a honeypot???
Screw em
We have Freerepublic
And Lindell’s new site
No apple 🍎 allowed !
Bingo.
The free fruit stand you pass in the country employ better security than Parker.
“The Wall Street Journal reports:
“The social-media site referred a number of posts to law enforcement, including one on Dec. 24 from a user who called for an ‘armed force’ of 150,000 people to ‘react to the congressional events of January 6,’ according to the letter, which included the post and communications with FBI officials among its exhibits and has been reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.
Parler said it forwarded to the Federal Bureau of Investigation on Jan. 2 a series of posts from a user saying he would be wearing body armor to the pro-Trump rally on Jan. 6. ‘It’s no longer a protest,’ Parler quoted the post as saying. ‘This is a final stand where we are drawing the red line at Capitol Hill. I trust the American people will take back the USA with force and many are ready to die to take back #USA.’”
Well. That sux. Seriously.
Did not know that.
Still a rotten ‘Apple’ organization. Need to keep a sharp eye on these leftist bastards.
It should be noted that Parler still isn’t back on thee Google Play Store. I can’t even find the APK in any of the (more reliable) APK repositories.
Apple is bad. Google is worse. Way worse. While there are Linux phones, they are LAUGHABLY bad and horrifically expensive (appreciably more than Apple’s most expensive offering) with internal components that are several generations old, at best.
There simply aren’t any good options to Big Tech at the moment.
NOT so f’n “triumphant” after all, now, is it.
https://news.gab.com/2021/04/19/parler-bends-the-knee-to-big-tech/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.