Posted on 04/18/2021 10:03:48 PM PDT by Salohcin
In another example of the Democrats’ support of political violence, Representative Maxine Waters (D-California) incited a violent mob in Minnesota yesterday to not to accept anything other than a guilty verdict for Derek Chauvin, the Minneapolis police officer on trial for the death of Daunte Wright. Just one day after the week long protests descended into violence, Rep. Waters’ urged protesters at Brooklyn Center to “to get more confrontational.”‘
“I am not happy that we have talked about police reform for so long,” Waters said. “We’re looking for a guilty verdict,'” she added in regards to the Derek Chauvin trial. ‘”If we don’t, we cannot go away.”
“We gotta stay on the street,'” Waters was recorded saying, adding that protesters needed ‘”to get more confrontational” and they should ignore the curfew in place.
Waters has a history of calling for violence to advance the Democrats’ radical political agenda. In 2018, Maxine Waters infamously called for attacks on the Trump administration, telling a crowd of supporters, “If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.”
Her call for increased street violence to pressure the jury to deliver a politically acceptable verdict is the antithesis of the ideals of the American judicial system. For Waters, and too many other Democrats and Leftists, the judicial system is just another tool of political power. What Waters is doing is substituting the political pressure of the mob for the deliberations of an impartial jury to determine the guilt or innocence of someone on trial. In other words, what she wants is a lynching, not a trial.
Closing arguments in the Chauvin trial are on Monday and it is an open question of whether the jury will be swayed by the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt presented at court or by the political pressure coming from the streets. I wouldn’t want to be on that jury, knowing the consequences of finding Chauvin not guilty.
Nonetheless, anyone who has followed the trial closely knows by now that the prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. To understand full weakness of the prosecution’s case is against Chauvin, I highly recommend Andrew Braca’s article: Trial Verdict Prediction (of Sorts): On legal merits alone, not guilty — but political dynamics drive injustice.
IMPEACH this she-devil with an IQ of “fo’deh five” !!!!
IMPEACH this glaring example of BLACK PRIVILEGE!!!!
IMPEACH THIS RACE-BAITING BLACK RACIST SHE-DEVIL!!!!
REMOVE THIS SHE-DEVIL BY ANY....MEANS....NECESSARY!!!!
In case nobody was looking the democrats have been undermining the judicial system form the 60’s look at what cases the supreme court won’t even look at and the laws they do pass it’s like a fun house there.
Maxine Waters (D-California): The civil rights of the police officers were not violated.....
From thread on defense and rebuttal...
https://twitter.com/ChaoStrib/status/1384249472473993217
“Judge says he concedes that Congresswoman Waters’ statements could give Nelson grounds for an appeal #GeorgeFloyd #ChauvinTrial”
What business does a Rep from CA have to do with a Minneapolis judicial case? She needs to be thrown out of the Congress for inciting a riot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.