Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When Did We Learn About the Age Profile of Covid-19’s Victims?
Cafe Hayek ^ | April 9, 2021 | Donald J. Boudreaux

Posted on 04/11/2021 1:07:14 PM PDT by CheshireTheCat

...My original post included my disagreement with Tyler’s insistence on discounting the fact that Covid reserves its dangers overwhelmingly for the very old.

James Markels believes my criticism of Tyler to be mistaken. One of Mr. Markels’s points is this one:

First, the fact that COVID-19 disproportionately killed the elderly was not something that was readily apparent right out of the box, when the virus was spreading rapidly.

This claim by Mr. Markels is incorrect. (Other of his claims also strike me as being either incorrect or inapt, but here – save for a brief point made below in closing – I limit my attention to the point quoted above.)

Yesterday in the comments section of Tyler’s post I offered some evidence of the early recognition of the age profile of Covid’s victims. This evidence was questioned by at least one other commenter. This morning, I happened to learn of an op-ed by Dr. David Katz that appeared in the March 20th, 2020, edition of the New York Times. Dr. Katz is founding director of the Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center....

"The clustering of complications and death from Covid-19 among the elderly and chronically ill, but not children (there have been only very rare deaths in children), suggests that we could achieve the crucial goals of social distancing — saving lives and not overwhelming our medical system — by preferentially protecting the medically frail and those over age 60, and in particular those over 70 and 80, from exposure."

Not only does Dr. Katz’s op-ed from nearly 13 months ago disprove the claim that the age profile of Covid’s victims was not known early on, note that Dr. Katz’s recommendation for how best to deal with Covid-19 is essentially the same as that offered in the Great Barrington Declaration....

(Excerpt) Read more at cafehayek.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: CheshireTheCat

We knew from the Diamond Princess what profile was most likely to have complications. They kept people imprisoned on that ship for weeks. There was no mystery in that in the slightest.

Japan buried a hell of a lot of it, but by March 15th, most of the data was in everyone’s hands. Anyone who tries to come up with some fiction that we didn’t know (probably to protect Cuomo’s pawing anything with two legs) is lying.


21 posted on 04/11/2021 5:46:44 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

The 1918 Spanish Flu was unusual in that it took many kids, teens, early adults and early middle age people. The ages hardest hit were skewed toward the young side with that disease.


22 posted on 04/11/2021 7:31:41 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (The Weak Never Started, The Cowards fail along the way, Only the Strong Survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage

“...country of origin, Spain”

Spain wasn’t the origin of that disease. News reporting in the US, Canada, England, Germany and other war powers in WW I was severely censored and controlled. The war powers did not want anything reported about how the disease had affected their troop strength and ability to fight. Information about the influenza was deemed to be critical war information.

Because Spain was neutral in WW I, the Spanish press was able to freely report on the disease. So, because the Spanish press freely discussed the influenza pandemic, it became known as the “Spanish Flu.”


23 posted on 04/11/2021 7:36:04 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (The Weak Never Started, The Cowards fail along the way, Only the Strong Survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CheshireTheCat

Our first data came from evacuee flights, a nursing home and a cruise ship (all with older people), and from Beijing lying thru their teeth, so our assumptions were sketchy at best. But, as of Dec 2020, CDC puts the death toll of those under 35 at around 4,000 souls (450/mo) and those 35-54 at around 30,000 souls (3,500/mo), with 35,000 souls claimed each month from the over-55 age bracket. (377,883 US deaths over 9 months between Mar 1 and Dec 31)

The first announced confirmed case was a young girl evacuated from Whuan on flight 2. The first confirmed case in a non-evacuee was Jan 21, Washington state, male, announced on Feb 29. On Feb 19, the first nursing home case tested positive. On Feb 26, an 80yo female from the same center also tested positive. These two deaths were announced March 3. On Feb 28, a high-schooler and a USPS worker tested positive. Feb 29th marked first ‘official’ death from CCPvirus, a 56-yo male. March 24 the first minor died.

New York only had 1 acknowledged case as of March 1, 2020. The first death of a minor was reported in Los Angeles on March 24. The CDC estimated in late March 2020 that almost 50% of those admitted to ICU were under 65: 12% were 20-44, and 35% were 45-64. Asymptomatics were calculated at 25%. The first public suggestion that the virus was airborne was March 30, 2020 headlines (Skagit Valley, WA choir).

In general the CDC first floated an all-age mortality rate of 3.4%, with other research saying 0.5 (Beijing figures) and the EU calculating 2.6% mortality. The CDC then corrected figures in late March 2020 to reflect 1.3%-2.6% all-age, and 6.4%-13% over-seventy mortality rates, with majority of deaths within 10 days of hospitalization. (This has since been adjusted over the past year; the advent of therapies and a better understanding of the virus leading to more positive outcomes)

February was the month Princess Cruises went into full quarantine and where a lot of our initial data was collected. On the Diamond Priness in Japan, the first seven deaths were all age 70 and above, with an age-group mortality of 9%. The CDC calculated the ship’s all-age mortality rate of 1.3-2.6%. The ship’s average tourist age was 58 and average crew age was 36. Of 697 testing positive, half (326) were still asymptomatic positives a month after the first positive test.

By Feb 2021, the ‘death bracket’ had dropped from over 70 to over 50, with 93% of deaths age 50 and older and 0.2 percent under 25. Or, according to the latest chart the CDC has cooked up, “Compared with 5—17-year-olds, the rate of death is 2 times higher in 0-4-year olds, 10 times higher in 18-29-year olds, 45 times higher in 30—39-year-olds, 130 times higher in 40-49-year-olds, 440 times higher in 50-59-year-olds, 1300 times higher in 60-69-year-olds, 3200 times higher in 70-84-year-olds, and 8,700 times higher in 85+-year-olds.”

cdc’s Feb 2021 chart:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/investigations-discovery/hospitalization-death-by-age.html

deaths by age/race through Dec 2020 are broken out in a chart at this cdc link::
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7014e1.htm

memory lane: age groups of Princess Cruise infected:
https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.12.2000256


24 posted on 04/11/2021 8:13:39 PM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson