Posted on 03/24/2021 10:34:34 AM PDT by ransomnote
This post is organized to present 4 points to consider, and then a few key questions regarding these considerations, and finally overall observations that together, I believe, demonstrate that the vaccines, and their ‘rushed’ trials are mixtures of fabrications.
Referencing his 30+ years of experience working in the vaccine industry, Dr. Yeadon makes the case that the PRC test renders false positive test results for approximately 90% of tests administered, and that false negatives are also reported. The publication date is 9/20/2020 at which time Dr. Yeadon states that he believes the vaccines will be pulled from the marked within 6 months following introduction.
From the article:
“Because of the high false positive rate and the low prevalence, almost every positive test, a so-called case, identified by Pillar 2 since May of this year has been a FALSE POSITIVE. Not just a few percent. Not a quarter or even a half of the positives are FALSE, but around 90% of them. Put simply, the number of people Mr Hancock sombrely tells us about is an overestimate by a factor of about ten-fold. Earlier in the summer, it was an overestimate by about 20-fold.”
Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics – the Deadly Danger of False Positives
3/22/2021, 10:13:02 AM · by ransomnote · 15 replies
lockdownsceptics.org ^ | September 20, 2020 | Dr Michael Yeadon
In the following article, the author makes the case that the PCR is invalid because it doesn’t identify the Covid-19 virus.
The PCR test identifies manufacturers’ specified strings of molecules (i.e., ‘primer sequenes’) said to be present in the Covid-19 virus.
From the article, “The CDC is using 12 different computer data base "primer" sequences, varying from 17 to 21 nucleotide sequences in a row to look for Covaids, the same sequence found in goats, papayas, river water, motor oil, etc.”
The same small sequence found in goats, papayas, your pyjamas”
“The WHO was using human Chromosome 8 as their test database “primer” sequence to detect Covaids, which was looking for the 18 in a row nucleotide sequence ctccctttgt tgtgttgt, which is found on the 8th out of the 23 pairs of chromosomal trees on all humans.“
https://images.hive.blog/DQmUtVYWuvrdvqvqqe9xwqQtu8QBPbKwJPDhPRTgtNqnXEy/image.png
From the article:
“A so called PCR "test" is NOT a test.
It's Nobel Prize winning inventor, Kary Mullis, himself was furious that it was being used for any such nonsense as it can neither “test” for anything nor prove how much of any detected genetic material is inside anybody, let alone tell anyone if whatever it does detect is the cause of any illness or disease or not.”
PLAGUE OF FEAR 2020 - Part 7 - THE NAIL IN COVID'S COFFIN
3/18/2021, 5:53:41 PM · by ransomnote · 11 replies
hive.blog ^ | Jan 31, 2020 | Steve Falconer, francesleader
https://images.hive.blog/DQmdj7E5B62nrFFJ8JHuDbcTuxEXSx2pEWtXx5eZGG6pKvJ/image.png
For example, the following is excerpted from Moderna’s Phase 3 trial report.
The primary efficacy analysis population (referred to as the Per-Protocol Set), included 28,207 participants who received two doses (at 0 and 1 month) of either Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine (n=14,134) or placebo (n=14,073), and had a negative baseline SARS‑CoV‑2 status.
The median length of follow up for efficacy for participants in the study was 9 weeks post Dose There were 11 COVID‑19 cases in the Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine group and 185 cases in the placebo group, with a vaccine efficacy of 94.1% (95% confidence interval of 89.3% to 96.8%).
Cases of COVID‑19, starting 14 days after Dose 2, were defined as symptomatic COVID‑19 requiring positive RT-PCR result and at least two systemic symptoms or one respiratory symptom.
Among all participants in the Per-Protocol Set analysis, which included COVID‑19 cases confirmed by an adjudication committee, no cases of severe COVID‑19 were reported in the Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine group compared with 30 cases reported in the placebo group (incidence rate 9.138 per 1,000 person-years). One PCR-positive case of severe COVID‑19 in a vaccine recipient was awaiting adjudication at the time of the analysis.”
The following are just a few of the problems with using an invalid test to validate Covid-19 vaccine trials.
“In another promising medical development, the biotechnology company Moderna has announced its COVID-19 vaccine could be up to 94.5% effective.
The news comes a week after Pfizer announced its vaccine could be up to 90% effective based on a similar, early analysis from its Phase 3 trial.”
I think it’s reasonable to assume that vaccine trial participants were give the PCR ‘test’ repeatedly: at the start of the trial, after Dose 1, after Dose 2, and then routinely through the 4 or so weeks of monitoring following to see at what point they might supposedly contract (e.g., subject’s PCR ‘test’ positive 10 days after vaccine administration – too soon for vaccine to protect participant).
I think you can see where I’m going here. For the vaccine trials to be valid, the PCR test had to be valid. However the PCR test is not valid for this use, yet the many PCR ‘supposedly’ administered to 28,207 always tracked reliably to portray consistent, reliable, positive vaccine trial results
College students used to have two specific terms for false experimental data.
“Fudging the data”: After the experiment or study failed to return expected outcomes, the data was ‘modified’ to support the experimental hypothesis.
“Dry lab-ing”: While the experimental design specified in detail exacting laboratory and instrumentation critera, phases, tests etc., no actual lab work occurred (no need to wash out beakers, etc. as no real lab work took place).
I have to wonder just HOW the vaccine companies all came up with their data under the circumstances.
I’ll add one more problem with the scenario involving the development of the Covid mRNA vaccines that has me wondering. I haven’t given it a lot of thought but I believe there is something to it.
Initially I was posting that the mRNA technology upon which the mRNA vaccines were based was discovered in 2005; obtained Emergency Use Authorization and in 15 years since has failed to obtain FDA approval; conducted animal trials in 2005 and 2012 in which all animals (cats) developed anti-bodies and then when exposed to the virus being tested at the time (HIV, Hep C, other Coronaviruses), all animals died (their immune systems over-reacted).
Recently a FReeper has been reporting that there was in fact a successful trials which included "mice, ferrets, monkeys and interim report on human trials 2017" using the same nano mRNA technology underpining the Covid vaccines.
Suppressed Information About the Covid-19 Vaccine' | Vol 01 Date: 03/20/2021 (freerepublic.com)
The sources I had consulted made no mention of trials involving mice that survived. I was going to hunt for that data to see if it was correct, but now that I know the trials are worthless, I won’t bother.
Here’s the problem. The mRNA technology was considered an exciting find in 2005 because it could open the door to T-cell immunity which was otherwise little understood but believed to hold tremendous promise for human health.
The first animal trials took place in 2005 and failed. More work was done and the second round of animal trials was performed in 2012 and again met with failure. The mRNA technology under development for the past 15 years never reached human trials or obtained FDA approval.
If the FReeper is correct that trials involving mice which survived took place in 2017, why didn't the researchers move to begin full-scale trials with that technology? 3 years later that technology was modified for use in Covid-19 vaccines, but it seems like nothing happened with the platform technology until it was selected to for modification serve as the basis for the Covid-19 vaccines.
I wonder if I dig up information on this, might I find that Hillary Clinton was expected to win the 2016 election after which time her administration would have required mandatory vaccinations.
Our enemies want to reduce our population to a tame, manageable size. Just wondering. If you’ve seen the ‘Lock Down” scenarios, it does seem that the New World Order types have been planning their worldwide coup for some time, and one of the analyzed scnearios was a pandemic. And then we had Bill Gate’s symposium in 2019 walking through pandemic scenarios. Fauci funded Wuhan long before Wuhan’s ‘accidental’ release of a virus comprised of human/bat/HIV RNA material.
~~~~~~~~~~~
We’ve been betrayed in all aspects of the Planned-Demic since the engineered China virus was first deployed in Yuhan.
The sick were denied all treatment and told to go home until they needed hospitalization. How many illnesses could be spun into a fake Planned-Demic if the public were denied treatment? How can they claim to have a compassionate dedication to protecting us if they refuse us the right to try FDA approved medications when we’re dying?
HCQ and Ivermectin were FDA approved and in use with good track records for decades. The CDC not only banned the off-label use of these drugs during a time they declared an unprecedented medical emergency, they wouldn’t even award these drugs “Emergency Use Authorization” they would later grant their fake vaccines. They denied dying people the right to assume any risks in a final attempt to survive the illness.
They’ve lied to the public and told us the Covid-19 vaccines are FDA approved. Fauci himself said they were when asked on video. He then went on to craftily equate FDA approval with FDA authorization when he knows the difference.
Fauci is on video stating that asymptomatic spread does not drive epidemics; he’ll say whatever needs to be said to advance the narrative, and if it’s that asymptomic spread is devastating and we all have to shut down the economy, schools, and life stay home, he’s your guy.
45 Second Twitter Video Clip of Dr. Fauci Saying. ".... asympomatic spread is rare and historically not a driver of outbreaks. Symptomatic people drive outbreaks."
(sidenote: Fauci's NIH division collaborated with Pfizer to produce their Covid-19 vaccine and in particular, on those mouse trials.)
In the following video interview excerpt on Twitter, the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, says Dr. Fauci is a liar and not qualified for the position he holds:
Text of Mullis’ comments:
“Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, you know, he doesn’t know anything really about anything and I’d say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it’s got a virus in there you’ll know it. He doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand medicine and he should not be in a position like he’s in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people and they don’t know anything about what’s going on in the body. You know, those guys have got an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda. They make up their own rules as they go. They change them when they want to. And they smugly, like Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera,”~ Kary Mullis
Where the Covid-19 vaccines are concerned, we’ve been denied informed consent which is required for us to balance the risks versus the benefits of having the vaccine.
All benefits of the vaccine are exaggerated because the spike protein is not specific to Covid-19; we’ve probably already encountered pathogens that caused our bodies to produce the spike proteins triggered by the vaccine. The benefits of the vaccine are non existant because the vaccine is predicated on fake vaccine trials and false positives etc.
The risks of having the vaccine are deleted, purged, and ridiculed as disinformation. Even as the CDC’s VAERS database shows the Covid vaccines are notably at the top of some key observed ‘event categories’ (ER visits, life threatening reactions, Deaths) out of 93 vaccines in just 2 months into their administration.
Silencing the discussion of risk, and therefore denying us informed consent violates the primary tennent of the Nuremberg Code of 1947.
They’ve lied to lock us down and force us to wear useless masks.
Is anyone still hoping that the tightening noose and assault on our rights and our bodies is suddenly going to stop, or better yet, improve? Is it logical to hope that, after telling us to expect that our lives will never be the same and we must henceforth live from vaccination, to vaccination, a life of masked social distancing, the vaccines will actually be a product of their (non existent) integrity and good will or that the vaccines will be worse than all measures leading up to it?
They want to hurt us, to kill us. They still won't allow us to use safe, FDA approved treatments for Covid, insisting we die without it instead in order to drive us to the vaccines. Is that not the obvious conclusion of the unending series of lies driving us like livestock through a maze of narrowing chutes toward enslavement and mandatory vaccinations?
The point is that Covid is a low risk disease, especially for under 65 and not obese. The need for these “vaccines” is a lie.
So, I’m not concerned with how the vaccinated group did.
Also, to your final point, the unvaccinated people are not sitting around waiting to be hospitalized. They gain immunity, some by having the almost-always mild symptoms, some by T-cell. The virus was already winding down in this manner. Meanwhile, the vaccinated will think they require boosters for years, apparently.
Harkonnen got told too.
Dude, have you and ransomnote never advanced emotionally beyond junior high? Seriously, folks try to engage you as adults when you post a “baffle them with BS” composition filled with errors and you respond like adolescents. Perhaps that’s the extent of your abilities? Or perhaps you do it or look for typos to avoid facing the SERIOUS deficiencies in your arguments?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I think you underestimate the time it takes for others to make sense of your posts and then respond to them.
Your process is quick - you throw stuff against the wall and see what sticks. Often this includes your favorite words “Jihad” and “vomit”. Like many trolls, you ignore rebuttal and repeat prior assertions as if you hadn’t received any response.
I think your purpose on these threads is not to legitimately interact with anyone, because you lack the capacity, but to absorb us all in this pointless interaction with you so that we do not use our time to advance the legitimate sharing/learning of information you seek to suppress.
My response process takes longer. I require some time to translate your assertions into logical discourse (if any is present, which is often not the case).
More of my time is required to identify and move specific pieces of information from integrated, internalized knowledge and clarify it so others not inside my head can understand it, and then I have to simplify it so that you can understand it.
With time I am becoming less and less interested in reading/responding to you because you are a waste of it.
They weren't typos. I know a typo when I see it. Did you know its 'Lone Ranger'?. You wrote 'Long Ranger'. Twice.
And that other one, 'courtesy', I forget how you mangled that one, but it was bad.
No, Hark. You are a not smart guy posing as a smart guy, that's all there is to it.
Its so obvious a Junior High kid (me) can see it.
Have a nice, vomit-free day. I have to go now.
Watch out for Ransomnote. She's spicy (and WAY smarter than you). She gets straight A's in Jr. High (4.0/Dean's list. I cheat off her.).
Did Harkonnen just get told AGAIN???
Damn. Stay down, man.
Stay down.
“All these are crimes against humanity and treason. Filtering this information into my understanding along with the rest of the world, I do not feel they would hesitate to violate double-blind protocols (they peeked) or fabricate the trial from the ground up.”
******************************************************************
Look, I’m not sure you’ve ever had responsibilities in real world jobs where meticulous records are kept, where those records are regularly audited/reviewed by independent reviewers employed to insure honesty and accuracy.
I recommend that you read for understanding the following linked article reporting on the Moderna Phase 3 clinical trial. I think you mean well but you have many misconceptions that you really should clear up. That’s just IMHO, of course.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389
You can't explain why positive PCR tests correlate with hospitalizations and deaths. No wonder you want to move on.
What has caused this miraculous metamorphosis?
He caught the car, and the car bites.
“I’m noting a new, respectful tone, albeit still with a condescending, superior air as if he’s talking to a child.”
*****************************************************************
Do you still have detention tomorrow or will you be able to make it to the game?
Stomping your foot will not make you right.
I peeked at your article, Hark. In the first couple of paragraphs, even my non-sciencey eye sees how she will attack it.
Wait for it.
#IfSheBothers
#GoodnightToAllNormalPeopleAndFearbrosAlike
No more Pee Wee League for me, I think.
You can’t explain why positive PCR tests correlate with hospitalizations and deaths. No wonder you want to move on.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Am I supposed to endlessly repeat myself until you go to bed, and then tomorrow, go back to endlessly repeating myself when you start posting again? Unlike you, nobody pays me to post.
This time, take notes.
They withheld medical treatment from people with respiratory ailments and gave them the PCR, which actually isn’t a medical test in that it doesn’t give a positive or negative for Covid answer. It’s intended to amply samples otherwise too small to detect for research purposes.
I’ll pause here so you can write that down.
*******************************************
*******************************************
Since they claim there is no isolated sample of Covid-19 and the inventor of the PCR says it cannot indicate whether someone is sick or not, there is no demonstrated correlation between Covid-19 and hospitalizations and deaths. If some of those illnesses were due to the genetically engineered Covid virus, they don’t know.
What they do know is denying all medical treatment to those who, as a result, first became mildly ill and then increasingly ill (hospitalization) and then terminally ill (that means death - write that down), many of who were elderly and vulnerable to infection, and recording a meaningless PCR results created a false correlation to drive the pandemic.
They also forced patients sick with severe contagious infections, some of which were likely the engineered biowarfare agent (Covid) into nursing homes, and then when residents became ill, denied them all medical treatment and administered the PCR to them.
If you really want to play the correlation game, you have to count those said to be asymptomatically ill with Covid-19(no correlation to death/hospitalization) and those who received false positives (approx. 90% of PCR) including the 600K people who never had the PCR and yet were notified they were positive for Covid.
Therefore, discussions of correlation between the unknown respiratory illness and hospitalization/death has no relation to Covid-19 and is a waste of time. But that was your goal, wasn’t it? To waste my time?
Anyone who starts a sentence with “Dude” is definitely at Junior High level.
😂😜🕵🏻♀️
LMAO!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The fox is guarding the hen house, obviously. I mean that it is obvious, glaringly so.
You keep pretending we're not under attack and that people who are trying to exterminate us lie awake at night worried about being audited by their friends in other corrupt agencies. The deep state did not leave auditors and their regular reviews processes ethically pristine and simply hope none would ever actually looked at their books. Obviously.
This appears to be a cognitive hurdle you are unwilling or unable to overcome.
“...I know that the vaccine contains a spike protein unrelated to the Covid-19 virus, but specified for other (common) Corona Virus....”
************************************************************
Which specific vaccine would that be that contains a spike protein unrelated to the Covid-19 virus? Moderna?
Can you provide a link to where that information can be found?
All of them.
Can you provide a link to where that information can be found?
Can you stop giving me homework assignments and look it up yourself?
They don't have the isolated Covid-19 virus so they cannot claim to know what spike protein to make, so they chose a spike protein for another type of corona virus. So the promotional materials are rather deceptive. An entire article written about the Covid-19 virus, and when they get to the spike protein they use the generic term "the Corona Virus spike protein " so people just assume it's for the Covid-19 versionof the Corona Virus.
“Can you stop giving me homework assignments and look it up yourself?”
************************************************************
I DuckDuckGo’ed & googled my fingers to the bone and nowhere could I find a COVID-19 vaccine that, in its design, used the spike protein for another type of coronavirus instead of the spike protein of the COVID-19’s virus. Perhaps you were confusing something else when you claimed they were using a spike protein from another type of corona virus.
Here are a couple of articles on the SARS-CoV-2 (the virus causing COVID-19) virus whose spike protein was used in the design of the Moderna vaccine.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41401-020-0485-4
https://cen.acs.org/pharmaceuticals/vaccines/tiny-tweak-behind-COVID-19/98/i38
I DuckDuckGo’ed & googled my fingers to the bone and nowhere could I find a COVID-19 vaccine that, in its design, used the spike protein for another type of coronavirus instead of the spike protein of the COVID-19’s virus. Perhaps you were confusing something else when you claimed they were using a spike protein from another type of corona virus.
Here are a couple of articles on the SARS-CoV-2 (the virus causing COVID-19) virus whose spike protein was used in the design of the Moderna vaccine.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41401-020-0485-4
https://cen.acs.org/pharmaceuticals/vaccines/tiny-tweak-behind-COVID-19/98/i38
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Based on the abusive pattern of behavior I have experienced from you, I don’t believe you’ve worked your fingers to the bone. You have no end of homework assignments to send me on so that I function as your personal tutor and have to set aside my research to answer your demands for attention.
I’m specifically not going to give you links to articles not yet posted (including the researcher who delved into the technical aspects of the Covid trials) on FR until I am sure I have extracted all the content I need because trolls like you ask (usually, taunt/demand)for links and it’s not unusual that, shortly after I provide them, I discover the content I’ve been referencing has been deleted.
So your people are using my people to help locate and, if possible, remove content we use to refute your distortions. Remarkably, we still defeat you in debate even though your people have MSM protection and wrap around propaganda to support your positions.
If you read articles out there that state that there is no isolated sample of Covid-19 virus, you can deduce without ruining your manicure that they can’t design spike proteins and vaccines for a virus for which they don’t have isolated samples. This article explains the issue:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3944996/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
