REVEALED: ‘Simple Math’ Shows Biden Claims 13 MILLION More Votes Than There Were Eligible Voters Who Voted in 2020 Election

Gateway Pundit ^ | December 20, 2020 | Joe Hoft

[CheshireTheCat]

...Bill Binney, of US Intel fame tweeted out a message yesterday noting that more people voted in the 2020 election nation-wide than were eligible to vote....Binney attaches a link to the number of registered voters in the US. We made a copy as of today and added these voters up. When we add up the number of registered voters we obtain 213.8 million registered voters in the US as of this morning....Binney attaches a link to the number of registered voters in the US. We made a copy as of today and added these voters up. When we add up the number of registered voters we obtain 213.8 million registered voters in the US as of this morning....

[Pajamajan]

bttt

[Wayne07]

No it doesn’t. It doesn’t show anything, and he doesn’t say he does, he just asks the question without an answer.

[Wayne07]

The sad thing is that the sack of shit Hoft's probably are smart enough to know why their article is wrong, but peddle it anyway to the literal retards out there. The answer is right in the article in front of your eyes.

The "OFFICIAL particiaprtion rate was 66%" of eligible voters, not registered voters. It is literally in the heading of the graph embedded in the article.

Do you see the words "voting-eligible population" in the graph? Ok, good. Not registered, eligible. There are 239 million eligible voters in the US. 66% participation of 239 million is 158 million votes. 74 million for Trump + 81 million for Biden is 155 million, under the total cast.

Please tell me this makes sense to you know, that you understand Gateway Pundit is piece of shit, and thank me for keeping you from looking like an idiot and repeating this nonsense.

[Steve Van Doorn]

"No it doesn’t. It doesn’t show anything, and he doesn’t say he does, he just asks the question without an answer."
You must be listening to something differently then I am.

Try again.
You gave the question about how many people with same names from different states.
Answer: "How many people with same name same date of birth and same cell phone number"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LefG1nzl-iI

[Wayne07]

"How many people with same name same date of birth and same cell phone number"

That isn't an answer, it is a rhetorical question. What is the actual answer? How many? He never says. He is obfuscating. A real answer is, we matched 15k names, DOBs, and phone numbers. He doesn't say it though because we know at least in from the initial sample of names, he didn't actually match phone number, just name and DOB.

[Steve Van Doorn]

said, "it is a rhetorical question. What is the actual answer? How many?"

I've never given an actual answer to a rhetorical question. Why would you expect him to?

said, "he didn't actually match phone number"
He said he did. Are you saying he is lying?

[Wayne07]

"He said he did. Are you saying he is lying?"

No, I'm saying you are lying. He didn't say he checked phone numbers in that video. You literally quoted him, "How many people with same name same date of birth and same cell phone number". That is not saying he checked phone numbers, that is him trying to bullshit his way out of the call.

[Steve Van Doorn]

Matt Braynard Answer: "How many people with same name same date of birth and same cell phone number"

you said, "You literally quoted him"
I'm lying because I quoted him answering a question with a question.
"That is not saying he checked phone numbers"

True it does imply he checked the phone numbers.

Is there a reason to not believe him? Oh that's right Trumph is bad. Is that the standard answer for everything?

[Wayne07]

Honestly, what do you think the answer is to how many? Do you think he means he checked phone number for all the names? We know that’s not true, so what does he mean?

[Steve Van Doorn]

1. said, "how many?"
how would I know.

2. said, "Do you think he means he checked phone number for all the names?"
Of course not. That is ridiculous.

3. said, "We know that’s not true"
We do? not me.

4. said, "what does he mean?"
It means he did check phone numbers. He never said how many but it certainly wasn't all of them or even close to all of them. It's needs to be done like a survey.

[Bruce Campbells Chin]

Well, I only got through differential equations in college, so perhaps you're right.

But I do know when an author either doesn't understand what he wrote, or he's blowing smoke up our butts.

And to be blunt...this is the kind of weak allegation onto which people latch when they're either paranoid nuts, or lazy thinkers. If it were actually true that the number of votes exceeded the number of registrants, that allegation would be front and center in every single lawsuit filed. It would be the most easily provable, blatant example of fraud possible. It would be trumpeted by every reputable conservative in the country.

But it isn't.

[Mr. K]

That is a great photo thank you

[Mr. K]

I’d like to see the entire country vote again

[AbolishCSEU]

Yes under strict, voter ID laws and if necessary purple ink, bar codes and eliminating all mail in ballots/ballot harvesting on ONE day with a deadline of 9 P.M. EST.

[central_va]

The numbers don’t add. Get your head out of your ....

[MayflowerMadam]

That’s so simple that it could be the first “word problem” given to kids in fourth grade.

[deport]

The Popular Vote

Biden won 81,283,098 votes, or 51.3 percent of the votes cast. He is the first U.S. presidential candidate to have won more than 80 million votes. Trump won 74,222,957 votes, or 46.8 percent of the votes cast. That’s more votes than any other presidential candidate has ever won, with the exception of Biden.

More than 159 million Americans voted in 2020: 159,633,396 to be exact. That’s the largest total voter turnout in U.S. history and the first time more than 140 million people voted. Voter turnout in 2020 was the highest in 120 years when measured as a percentage of the voting-eligible population: 66.7 percent. You have to go back all the way to 1900 to find a higher percentage turnout (73.7 percent). The election of 1876 holds the record for highest turnout: 82.6 percent. That, of course, was also one of America’s most controversial and consequential elections—and not in a good way.

Minnesota holds pride of place with the highest state voter turnout. Eighty percent of Minnesotans went to the polls. Oklahoma holds the dubious distinction of being the state with the lowest voter turnout. Just 55 percent of Oklahomans voted.

https://www.cfr.org/blog/2020-election-numbers

[SmokingJoe]

You are the one who is confused by basic math.
President Trump got a higher percentage of black and Latino votes than he did in 2016.
Biden got a lower percentage of Latino and black votes than Hilary did in 2016.
A higher percentage of a higher black/Latino votes means President Trump got vastly more black/Latino votes altogether this year than he did in 2016.
Higher percentage of a higher turnout equals higher number of votes. Biden under performed everywhere apart from the few outlaw, gangster ruled, Dem governed big cities(Philly, Detroit, Milwaukee etc) where the BLM ANTIFA terrorists managed to steal ballots for Biden on an unprecedented scale.
You are going to need to go back to kindergarten to brush up on your basic math again.

[SmokingJoe]

You are welcome.

[Steve Van Doorn]

posted from article "Eighty percent of Minnesotans went to the polls"
The problem with that it's not true as my post 79 PROVES statistically (not conjecture or conflicting figures from the original article)