BREAKING: SUPREME COURT: The KRAKEN Has Hit SCOTUS DOCKET, Has PROOF Of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF FAKE BIDEN VOTES, Dominion System GLITCHES, REMOVAL OF TRUMP VOTES

https://www.thedailyfodder.com ^ | By John Paluska - December 16, 2020

[Red Badger]

Sidney Powell's "Kraken" has finally made it to the docket of the Supreme Court. The suit is perhaps the strongest collective argument yet against voter fraud.

It contains the forensic audit done in Michigan that proves systemic voter fraud occurred through the Dominion Voting System tabulation. It also has proof of at least 200,000 FRAUDULANT VOTES casted in the election.

Further, it contains official Georgia elections records that prove the Dominion Voting Systems program's "inability to repeatably duplicate creditable election results." In other words, official Georgia election canvassers could not rely on Dominion Voting Systems' software to count the vote because it didn't repeat the same vote totals twice.

The Lawsuit states:

15. The Interim Report shows multiple grave problems with the accuracy and vulnerability to hacking and evidence destruction of the Dominion Voting Systems (“Dominion”) machines used in Antrim County, Michigan. The report is relevant to each of the Related Cases because each of the states in question uses Dominion equipment. The Interim Report vindicates the lengthy opinion and order of Judge Amy Totenberg in Curling v. Raffensperger, 2020 WL 5994029 (N.D. Ga. 10/11/20), which found “extreme” and unacceptable security risks in the Dominion system. Compelling evidence and expert analyses show convincingly that the results of the Dominion system cannot be trusted and should not have been certified.

16. The findings in the Interim Report are consistent with the expert testimony provided by Mr. Ramsland regarding Dominion’s vote manipulation in the Petitioners’ November 25, 2020 complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (the “District Court”) (R 450; 2438), and with his testimony in the Related Cases. Mr. Ramsland concluded in the Georgia case that, for the State of Georgia, “at least 96,000 mail-in ballots were fraudulently cast,” and “136,098 ballots were illegally counted as result of improper manipulation of the Dominion software,” id., each of which is several times larger than former VicePresident [sic] Biden’s margin of victory in Georgia (10,457 votes). Similar anomalies exist in the Related Cases. Among other things, the Complaints in the trial courts and the Petitions to this Court in each of the Related Cases all seek prospective injunctive relief requiring a similar forensic audit of Dominion voting machines.

17. The Coffee County, Georgia Board of Registration and Elections refused to certify the machine recount election returns on their Dominion systems “given its inability to repeatably duplicate creditable election results.”6 The results of the machine recount report were internally inconsistent and could not be reconciled and were inconsistent with both the election night count and the hand audit.7 The Coffee County BRE analysis confirms the findings of the Interim Report, cited above, that ballots going to adjudication can be changed on a wholesale basis by the operator with no oversight, controls or accountability, an extremely serious vulnerability.

The Kraken has been released, and it's time to audit the vote and cancel out the widespread fraud that tipped the election for Biden.

[ohioman]

NELSON111 is nothing but a traitor and should be banned from this site.

[Victor]

"....You hit the nail on the head right there. Keyboard cowboys are about all we are anymore. I’m too old to organize the patriots but would surely join them if it became an organized outfit....."

Probably the most meaningful statement on this thread....

Like yourself, I also am too old, a little slower now, to organize...

But would surely join the patriots if it became an organized outfit.

I'm a pretty good cook...and not a bad shot, up close or long distance.

I'm good to go- I understand there's around 100K Freepers; if even half of us let the various state militias know that we stand with them, would that help?

[A Conservative Future]

The problem is, in every single lawsuit that has made it into a courtroom, one of two things has happened:

• The lawyers drop most or all of the purported evidence of fraud because they know it does not meet basic evidentiary standards, and are then reduced to telling the judge that, in fact, they do not have any evidence to support their initial claims of massive fraud, or
• The judges reject the claims of fraud on the basis that the evidence does not meet basic evidentiary standards, and the suit is dismissed, often with prejudice

So, sure, there may be "lots of proof" in the form of breathless articles from Falun Gong, Jim Hoft, and Alex Jones, and some testimony from some glory hounds eager to get their fifteen minutes and riff with Sarah Palin about how Obama paid the CCP to create SARS-CoV2. But there isn't any evidence that will stand up to American jurisprudence - administered by the most conservative judiciary we have had in over a century.

There was no widespread fraud. Biden won. Millions of Republicans split their ticket and voted Trump out of the White House while maintaining their loyalty to the party down ballot. It's Occam's razor.

[LilFarmer]

Can you point me to a lawsuit that this has happened?

I know it wasn’t Wood or Powell because their cases haven’t been heard and their lawsuits are full of fraud. Same with Trump/Shafer lawsuit in GA.

Have you read any of the lawsuits? I’m guessing not. No “Jim Hoft, Falun Gong or Alex Jones” in any of them.

Cite your source. Looks like you are just another troll on FR spreading disinformation.

[A Conservative Future]

NELSON111 is nothing but a traitor and should be banned from this site.

NELSON111 has been a FReeper in good standing for over twenty years. He is a principled conservative who does not chuck his values when it's convenient. Now he's to be purged because you disagree with him? (Not that he needs me to defend him, I just find the whole purge-dissent thing to be very liberal.)

[LilFarmer]

Says the person who joined in June 2020, lol

[A Conservative Future]

Cite your source. Looks like you are just another troll on FR spreading disinformation.

Sure. I'm working at the moment, so I need a little time to get it together. But you are absolutely entitled to call me on such a thing and I will provide to the best of my ability. And if I fail to deliver, I expect to be properly excoriated. I am definitely in the minority around here, but no, I'm not a troll. I'll post it in this thread once I have it together and tag you in the reply.

[LilFarmer]

Good, I look forward to seeing what you can come up with.

[Arones]

Thank you.

I'm getting tired of the amateur Grammar Nazis.

[A Conservative Future]

Let's start with Donald J. Trump For President, Inc. et al v. Boockvar et al in Pennsylvania Supreme Court, filed on November 9, 2020, in which the Trump campaign alleged "widespread, nationwide voter fraud of which this is a part", according to lead attorney Rudy Giuliani, who said he would offer evidence of his claims if the court allowed the case to proceed to an evidentiary hearing.

However, after being questioned repeatedly by the judge - who was bending over backward trying to give Giuliani an out so that he did not contradict himself or make his case moot or pointless - Giuliani eventually stated specifically that the case "doesn't plead fraud. It pleads a plan or a scheme." Said scheme was apparently surrounding a technicality about whether observers were permitted to read every single ballot and envelope, versus whether the law allows them to be "present in the room" while canvassing is taking place.

There were also a small number of cured and provisional ballots which the Trump campaign declared diluted all mail in ballots, and as such all those ballots should be thrown out, disenfranchising every mail voter in the affected counties. The Trump campaign eventually doubled down and declared that, because only some counties offered the opportunity to fix or cure ballots, nearly seven million voters (who happened to have voted by mail and thus were statistically far more likely to have voted for Biden) should be disenfranchised under equal protection arguments. However, once again, "(Giuliani) eventually had to admit to the judge that he was not making voter fraud claims in this particular suit."

So, again, after grandstanding in front of the cameras for a week about a nationwide conspiracy to steal the election with widespread, coordinated voter fraud, when they got into a courtroom, the Trump campaign repeatedly abandoned their claims of fraud in their entirety, and their suit was dismissed for lack of evidence. Quoting from the decision:

"One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption. Instead, this court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations … unsupported by the evidence." - Judge Matthew Brann

More as I have time.

[LilFarmer]

Thank you for that one.

Just a reminder, you said in post #83 *every single lawsuit*... so I am hoping you can prove me wrong with *every single lawsuit*. Unless that was hyperbole.

[ohioman]

Got here in 1999 and it is clear that Powell is fighting the good fight for all of us.

[joshua c]

Yes she has 4 states on the Docket. WI MI PA AZ?

Wood has 1 state(GA)

[LilFarmer]

Thanks, FRiend, I agree.

[HamiltonJay]

Again, as we learned before, being on the docket doesn’t mean the Supreme Court will hear the case.. it obvious the court is full of cowards.

[A Conservative Future]

Next, let's look at Trump vs Pennsylvania, et al in the Third Circuit. Again, after Jenna Ellis and Rudy Giuliani spent days in front of cameras insisting that they had concrete evidence of widespread, massive voter fraud, once they actually got before the court, they stressed that the campaign "doesn't plead fraud... [T]his is not a fraud case." (from the Motion to Dismiss, 118:19-20, 137:18). Again, they fell back on specific technicalities about how some counties restricted observers during the canvassing, and that a small number of voters were permitted to cure ballots, from which they concluded that the remedy was to disenfranchise millions of Biden voters.

Because those claims had already been heard and dismissed for lack of evidence, they actually made a different claim on appeal, on a very, very narrow technicality: that the District Court abused its discretion when it did not let the Trump Campaign amend its complaint a second time. It did not use this opportunity before the second highest court in the land to reveal their evidence of widespread conspiracy to deny Trump his rightful victory - evidence they repeatedly claimed to have, and that, at one point, they erroneously claimed they were holding onto in order to present in higher courts (despite the fact that this is not, in any way, how American jurisprudence functions).

So, once again, the Trump campaign and their allied media outlets loudly and repeatedly claimed to have evidence to present in court that widespread, coordinated election fraud had been perpetrated on the American people by a shadowy cabal of "liberals", "the Communist Chinese", and "RINOs". But when they got to court, they presented no such thing, argued technicalities, and were dismissed for lack of evidence of any irreparable harm:

"Seeking to turn those state-law claims into federal ones, the Campaign claims discrimination. But its alchemy cannot transmute lead into gold. The Campaign never alleges that any ballot was fraudulent or cast by an illegal voter.* It never alleges that any defendant treated the Trump campaign or its votes worse than it treated the Biden campaign or its votes. Calling something discrimination does not make it so. The Second Amended Complaint still suffers from these core defects, so granting leave to amend would have been futile.

"And there is no basis to grant the unprecedented injunction sought here. First, for the reasons already given, the Campaign is unlikely to succeed on the merits. Second, it shows no irreparable harm, offering specific challenges to many fewer ballots than the roughly 81,000-vote margin of victory. Third, the Campaign is responsible for its delay and repetitive litigation. Finally, the public interest strongly favors finality, counting every lawful voter’s vote, and not disenfranchising millions of Pennsylvania voters who voted by mail. Plus, discarding those votes could disrupt every other election on the ballot." - Third Circuit Court of Appeals decision, Trump vs Pennsylvania

More as I have time. I don't want to just throw links up and claim to have made my case; context is important.

*Emphasis mine.