Skip to comments.
1958: Istvan Angyal, Hungarian revolutionary
ExecutedToday.com ^
| December 1, 2018
| Headsman
Posted on 11/30/2020 8:07:11 PM PST by CheshireTheCat
On this date in 1958, Angyal Istvan was hanged for the failed 1956 Hungarian revolution. A working-class Jew who survived Auschwitz as a boy — his mother and sister were not so fortunate — Angyal was a convinced leftist who became disaffected with the Hungarian regime not because of its Communism but because of its failure to realize the democratic and egalitarian aspirations of that ideology....
(Excerpt) Read more at executedtoday.com ...
TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS:
To: CheshireTheCat
Angyal was a convinced leftist who became disaffected with the Hungarian regime not because of its Communism but because of its failure to realize the democratic and egalitarian aspirations of that ideology....So basically he thought that socialism would work if only the right people were running it.
2
posted on
11/30/2020 8:08:56 PM PST
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: CheshireTheCat
I enjoy the threads, just wish that they were more latter than former.
3
posted on
11/30/2020 8:18:56 PM PST
by
waterhill
(`)
To: dfwgator
So basically he thought that socialism would work if only the right people were running it
Ironically, he probably thought that it would work if only the right people were hanged.
To: CheshireTheCat
A song that honors the Hungarian freedom fighters:
Avanti, Ragazzi di Buda (charge, boys of Buda)--sine nomine (1957)
5
posted on
11/30/2020 8:42:32 PM PST
by
Fiji Hill
To: dfwgator
[So basically he thought that socialism would work if only the right people were running it. ]
I think a lot of communists thought the system would involve the popular vote rather than what it turned out to be - kings with the title of General Secretary or Party Chairman, along with aristocrats, the nomenklatura, with the title of commissar or secretary of this or that. They were wrong. Communism not only turned out to be a semi-hereditary monarchy complete with aristocracy - it was far more repressive than the monarchies it replaced. While repression can keep a lid on things for a while, it can equally distort reality until a blow-off event occurs, upon which all bets are off. The Soviet bloc could have have kept its repressive regimen for a while, but the further it clamped down, the harsher the blowback would have been. In a way, the place isn’t completely de-communized partly because the kind of large-scale killings of dissidents to which dying regimes are prone did not occur there.
6
posted on
11/30/2020 8:49:30 PM PST
by
Zhang Fei
(My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
To: Zhang Fei
You cannot have socialism without a Police State, period. I don’t care who is running it.
7
posted on
11/30/2020 8:50:44 PM PST
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: waterhill
Thank you, but I am not sure what you mean by more “latter than former.”
Some days there are really no interesting people in history who were executed. Other days it is a tough choice from a few interesting people.
Dec. 1 wasn’t a really interesting day.
8
posted on
11/30/2020 9:19:01 PM PST
by
CheshireTheCat
("Forgetting pain is convenient.Remembering it agonizing.But recovering truth is worth the suffering")
To: CheshireTheCat
To: CheshireTheCat
Thank you, but I am not sure what you mean by more “latter than former.”I think he or she meant it would be nice to read about some recent executions of traitors. Alas, that will never be.
10
posted on
12/01/2020 5:50:32 AM PST
by
Sans-Culotte
(11/3-11/4/2020 - The USA became a banana republic.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson