Posted on 11/21/2020 8:03:33 PM PST by Federalist Patriot
I listened to the claim about Kemp’s family receiving benefits, not the Governor. I went back and relistened to make sure what I heard. Regardless, if benefits were given to the families of the Governor and the SOS, it is just like Hunter Biden. It stinks. But, Powell speaking precisely said it was the families of the Governor and the SOS.
Gwjack
I bet she saved those text messages with Tucker.
I was thinking the same. Perhaps the skunk so-called GOP
SOS in Georgia. But the Sekulow gang has Georgia stuff coming out. So that Point might be moot in re Georgia. But I get where you are coming from. . A different state maybe
Hi Mr. K, I hope you are well.
Powell is doing exactly what she has been retained to do - represent the President and expose the highly irregular and potentially illegal acts regarding the election. She does not have criminal law within her portfolio. Let others do that. Powell should not be eviscerated for not bringing criminal charges as that is foreign to her mission. As for me, all of it is important, but her express job is to secure the election results. She is doing a fine job with that. She is like many of us lawyers that were taught not to overrun our authority. The foundation (the re-election) must be laid and set before any criminal charges get pursued. If PDJT is not re-elected, there will be no criminal prosecutions of merit. The election is the ultimate imperative, and all else is secondary at this time.
Gwjack
So Nancy Pelosi makes plans to leave the country but as she gets ready to go she turns around to mass arrests Of her colleagues and turns into salt
This woman ROCKS.
You know, that is exactly right. What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. Thank you for bringing that up.
l8r
Is this woman a Q person? She retweets an account that does a lot of Q stuff.
Q has had a really bad record of predictions. Remember, Mattis was gonna be running Tribunals?
Do you know if she is using Q information? She retweets a lot of Q accounts. I hope fraud gets uncovered, but the track record of Q is bad. They lead people on wild goose chases.
My concern is going off on a tangent that wastes time.
Nobody said Mattis would be running tribunals, but Q’s predictions have actually been quite stellar. Here’s 15 of them.
https://files.catbox.moe/20pdep.pdf
Oh ok, so Sidney Powell is a Q person? I’ll look more into their record but things I saw in past didn’t look so good. Is it the position of Q that JFK Jr is still coming back? At least, that was what I had seen. What is the official Q source these days?
Criminal charges? Is she part of the DOJ?
And she has many hundreds of affidavits already
how can you think they don’t know already?
and it’s not to give us hope.
we’re not children who need a “mom” to give us hope
maybe she talks SO MUCH to keep the news alive to those who don’t think anything happened
and honest? I’d be fine not reading one more article, seeing one more video, or hearing one more word until this gets to the SCOTUS
There have been more ridiculous youtube videos from people who joined FR recently than i have seen my whole time here.
I’ll pray and put the case to the back of my mind until it’s in the SC
I believe Powell worked for years at the Fed 5th Circuit.
doesn’t matter what she was.
She has no authority to arrest someone and her speaking about prison and sentences would mean nothing and possibly get her in trouble with the bar association
I find the more someone speaks and brags about something (like the mother of all lawsuits) the less I tend to believe them
So I will ignore it and pray until this goes to the SC
Then i will pray even more
In a probable very important related matter, obviously predating our highly architected massive election fraud disaster, (for whatever it’s worth), the Presidents team is aware Pelosi led a high level congressional delegation, which included some senators, (and which included at least a few Republicans), to Brussels, where they had a high level meeting at NATO. The purpose of the discussion did get into our foreign military commands, potential NATO roles, and a not so subtle take down of President Trump.
What did they approach NATO with —
I don’t know it as concrete, but there was discussion surrounding the coming 3 NOV 2020 US election, and potential authorization of military and NATO intervention.
But how could they do this —
Potentially problematic to the Trump Administration was discussion of bending, or expanding NATO Article 5 to include language pertaining to Coup d’etat, which would then be defined to include a President or leader of a NATO member state, not stepping down after an election loss.
In this case, the Pelosi delegation was of course referencing Trump not stepping down after an election, at the very least.
Don’t know the outcome, but didn’t at the time believe they would have gained traction. Now, I am not so sure.
And Dominion/SCYTL/Hart access was not just in Germany, but all over the world.
This is the kind of thing which should result in Pelosi’s conviction of treason, and treason’s defined penalty.
But hey, can’t even arrest a sitting congressman...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.