Posted on 11/11/2020 9:40:52 PM PST by bitt
President Trump tweeted tonight one of the most important tweets of his Presidency. He has identified voter fraud related to Dominion voting machines. We’ve reported that there were numerous instances in this election where votes were switched from President Trump to Joe Biden in states predominantly using Dominion voting machines:
Tonight the President responded that the Dominion voting systems were involved in election fraud and they got caught. He tweeted that Dominion attempted to alter our election and they got caught.
It’s gonna get good now.
Thank you for this wonderful homage.
Bttt
No, i think he meant the pronoun.
"What do we know about Dominion?"
"[We know] It attempted to alter our election and got caught."
Oh, you betcha' - remember, Pompeo was CIA Director for two years, he knows what Haspel knows.
Ah yes, Terry McAliffe.
The DOJ, by constitutional law, can’t get involved with the election until 10 days after election day.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Absolute Bullshivick!
YOU MUST READ WHATS HAPPENING ON THIS ISSUE. Too much disinfo on the topic.
Barr is going after the perps...for real:
“The real story behind AG Barr authorizing investigations of vote fraud blows away the MSM narrative”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3904738/posts
***********************************
“he point is that there’s more to see here than just another career DoJ drama queen flouncing off the election fraud stage. Barr took his action because he became aware that investigations of election fraud were being blocked from within DoJ HQ.
As SWC details, the drama queen, one Richard Pilger, has been in charge of the Election Crimes Branch at DoJ HQ for quite a few years. During the Obama years he wrote up a manual of procedures for the handling of allegations of election law violations. That manual specified that the local US Attorneys (USAs) — including their Assistants (AUSAs) and FBI agents — could take no action with regard to allegations of election law violations without DoJ HQ — meaning, without Pilger’s — approval.
There’s an important distinction here, one that might seem minor but which helps to see events of the last week more clearly — those events leading up to Barr’s action.
First of all, that provision in the manual didn’t prevent the FBI or local USA offices from receiving allegations of election crime violations.
Now, you’ll recall that shortly after the election, Barr had his DAG specifically state that FBI agents could enter election centers armed. That was a clear sign that the FBI was receiving complaints of election law violations and was responding to them by going to election centers — presumably because the complaints were coming from workers at those centers. They were being blocked from entering because they were armed, and their complaints about this obstruction got to Barr very quickly.
So, why were the agents armed, and why didn’t they just ditch their sidearms somewhere and get on with the investigation? Because FBI agents are required to be armed when conducting official business unless authorized otherwise — they can’t exempt themselves from the requirement. There has to be a reason for an agent to go unarmed, and it has to be authorized from higher up. There’s no need to go into the reasons for this policy — it has to do with investigative authorities — but I can tell you that it caused years of trouble with the airlines, and even with individual pilots who thought they were the law on ‘their’ plane.
Clearly, then, local election officials were probably refusing entry to FBI agents, perhaps with the assistance of armed local police or security. This was presenting a roadblock for the agents, who were obviously not about to engage in a shoot out in those circumstances! Thus, Barr’s intervention.
As SWC notes:
Contrary to popular belief, the FBI has not been sitting on its hands all week while evidence of suspicious activity has been developing in multiple locations across the country.
So, Barr at that point knew that the FBI was doing its job. But then it turned out that that wasn’t the only roadblock for investigators. It’s entirely possible that Barr may not initially have been aware that Pilger was blocking any substantive action on the allegations that the FBI (and probably USAs) was/were receiving. When Barr learned of this, he took action. As SWC explains:
What happened today, and what prompted Pilger to “quit” was that AG Barr said to US Attorneys – “If you have substantial allegations of election fraud in your district, you have authority to investigate that.” Basically, Barr cut Pilger and Election Crimes Branch out of the picture as “gatekeepers” to starting investigations in places like Philadelphia, Milwaukee, Detroit, and Atlanta.
It’s a bit like federalism in action within DoJ, with authority being devolved to the local judicial district level. But you and I would never have known what was behind Barr’s action without insider knowledge of Election Branch procedures. So, with one stroke of the pen Barr has broken up the logjam that obstructionists at DoJ (protected by civil service laws) had constructed.
To understand why this has liberal knickers in such a knot, it’s necessary to understand the effect of Barr’s action. FBI agents — the investigators — can do quite a bit of investigating without grand jury involvement. Many cases can be essentially completed using techniques such as interviews and physical surveillance, consensual searches, and so forth. It all depends on the nature of the crime involved. In the case of election fraud, it’s safe to say that, beyond volunteered information, no evidence of substance can be gathered without use of a grand jury subpoena, no matter what election workers may have told the FBI. What Barr has done with his action is to facilitate grand jury involvement in these investigations.
Thank you. Looking closer at the metaphor, Joe Lafors is the best lawman. He is Lin Wood. Rudy is Lord Baltimore, the scout, the navigator. They never work together. Until Harriman hires them.
It’s an image In this case, a classic western outlaw v lawman, of justice approaching personified by a team of experts, made famous by their well publicized past successes put together by a magnate successful in his own right, done with outlaws taking advantage of him and especially his customers
P
i know the ten days was baloney..i pointed out the policy..clearly if you see a bank robbery you dont wait ten days..
By the way...that anomaly I pointed out in my prior post occurred in 1/4 of a second, not 1.5 minutes. Look at the timestamps.
Yep.
There was a blocker at DOJ. The dam has broken.
A lot of electoral fraud perps are lookin’ over their shoulders now.
lotta important information at your link.
thanx for posting
check it out on your tour LJ
The DOJ, by constitutional law, can’t get involved with the election until 10 days after election day. Mark Friday the 13th as the DemonKKKrats’ unlucky day.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Apparently is just a habit, or standard, not a law, has nothing to do with constitution, and AG Barr said a coulpe or three days ago that the DoJ has been on already.
Don’t know what Haspel said to McConnell, but there was statement yesterday that she isn’t declassifying docs that were wanted re: russian hoax background because of “allies”.
That won’t last long, she’ll be overruled.
Thanks
See my comment just above; DoJ already involved and AG Barr announced additional, couple days ago. Not law.
Don’t know what Haspel said to McConnell, but there was statement yesterday that she isn’t declassifying docs that were wanted re: russian hoax background because of “allies”.
That won’t last long, she’ll be overruled.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
she could be in a CYA mode since she was Clown station chief in london when most of the dossier stuff went together.
plus she’s got to “protect” other culprits GB, NZ, AUS, ITALY
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.