[Paladin2]

Only 132,000?

The ‘Rats are slipping.

[ExTexasRedhead]

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1325592112428163072.html

https://twitter.com/APhilosophae/status/1325592664520142849

“The following information is provided via an anonymous data scientist and another anonymous individual who wrote a script to scrape the national ballot counting time series data of off the @nytimes website.

This is based on their proprietary “Edison” data source which would ordinarily be impossible to access for people outside the press.

The CSV is available here:
s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id145669…
And the script to generate it is here:

I suggest that everyone back up both of these files, bc this is an extremely important data source, and we cant risk anyone taking it down.
What we are looking at will be time series analysis and you will see that it is extremely difficult to create convincing synthetic times series data. By looking at the times series logs of the ballot counting process for the entire country, we can very easily spot fraud.

One of the first things noticed while exploring the dataset is that there seems to be an obvious pattern in the ratio of new #Biden ballots to new #Trump ballots. ...

[dp0622]

I’m surprised Trump got any votes in these states :)

[systemjim]

Only 132,000?

The ‘Rats are slipping'
______________
My question: Are there any Democrats anywhere who have even an ounce of integrity remaining?

[systemjim]

Only 132,000?

The ‘Rats are slipping'
______________
My question: Are there any Democrats anywhere who have even an ounce of integrity remaining?

[systemjim]

Only 132,000?

The ‘Rats are slipping'
______________
My question: Are there any Democrats anywhere who have even an ounce of integrity remaining?

[Conservinator]

That is probably just mail in ballots. The audit is likely that another 3% of the votes were switched by the “Soros/Obama/Clinton/Pelosi” software used to count the votes.