Posted on 11/07/2020 4:30:01 PM PST by grundle
I watched this entire 67 minute video by Dilbert creator Scott Adams. I really enjoyed it.
He said that for any individual accusation of voter fraud, there’s a 95% chance that the accusation is false.
Then he says there is a 100% chance that voter fraud is real.
He said that using dead people wouldn’t get enough votes to flip an election, and would be too easy to detect.
He said the stories of vans full of fake ballots coming in the middle of the night are also fake for the same reason.
He then says that the only possible way to rig an election without getting caught would be to rig the voting software.
He says that there is a 100% chance that this will eventually happen, either by the highest ranking one or two employees at the software company (via either bribery or blackmail) or by hacking from the outside, such as by a foreign government, or a political opponent.
He also points out that the companies that write this software refuse to let the public see their code, as it is considered a trade secret.
He also points out that today’s computer software is so complex that there is only one or, at most, two people at any given software company who fully understand how the entire software package works, and that bribery or blackmail of these one or two people could be enough to swing an election. He also said that if the election was rigged, it will eventually be exposed by the data (including, but not limited, to Benford’s Law), and that the math experts have already begun their examination.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpV52HeKLHU
I agree with you, my suspicion is that it was a multi-mode attack. Software flipping votes, pre-filled mail in ballots worked into the USPS stream before election day. I think their big mistake was the stoppage late on election day in those few states. I think they looked at Trump’s numbers and said, “oh sh*t, this is too close, we need to feed in some more mail in ballots” - hopefully they were sloppy in that period and it can be discovered.
I’m not a data scientist, but I did analyze a lot of data in my career. Just from my seat of the pants look at the popular vote numbers along with previous numbers, turnout numbers, distributions, etc. it appears to me that there may be around 10 million excess votes in Biden’s total.
Absolutely correct! There used to be one lady, named Liz, who wrote and tested all the software for Broward County Florida when Jane Carroll was the Elections Supervisor, back in the 1970s when I knew her. There was nothing particularly complex about it, just detail, and it is bizzare to read about such problems as non-functional software and emergency updates, etc.
Exactly. Yes, they use tech means, but they also use all kinds of good old-fashioned means too. I know. I was involved in the Dem party in a big city way back—and it was at best an open secret. They had multiple means of cheating that were talked about without involving tech/software.
There are all kinds of ways cheating is done electronically and the voting system providers don’t work as contractors for government entities, writing code that belongs to and is operated by those entities. They provide licensed software. There were reports that Dominion Voting actually downloaded a system “update” the night before the election.
And the gov is in on it too. “Scorecard” is software that works with the Hammer/HAMR to change election results of foreign entities on the fly, as the results are being uploaded to centralized systems for full tabulation. The NSA whistleblower Dennis Montegomery wrote both systems and then saw the Obama/Dem/CIA machine turn both systems on their political enemies.
Scott Adams also said he wasn’t voting for Trump.
Scott said an army of autistic data crunchers has been weaponized and are researching this fraud in a crowd sourced manner. Let’s see what comes out of it.
1) the smartest software and statistical analysts in the world are actively engaged in and examining data for software voter fraud.
2) There is software that was created to “adjust” and tamper with fair elections held by the intelligence agencies of the US. Other countries probably have it or something similar as well, and that means the genie is out of the bottle and people with money may also have such software.
3) The Supreme Court will hear on set of “facts & witnesses” and an opposing set and kick the issue back to the States to resolve on an individual basis and those States will probably only be able to turn it over to their legislatures who are primarily Republican.
Scott Adams also said he wasn’t voting for Trump.
***************
He said that, and then reversed himself a few days later.
Whether he actually voted for Trump or not, who knows?
Thanks for the follow-up. I knew it sounded odd when he said he wasn’t voting for Trump. I was hoping it was a spoof.
He did the. Exact same on/off switch in. 2016. He likes to speak ironically and it’s not easy to see when he is not
Alas IDNWOTN. A modification of SDMWOTN
Read later!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.