Posted on 05/14/2020 4:35:01 AM PDT by EyesOfTX
The Deep State sends a clear signal through Judge Emmet Sullivan. If William Barr and John Durham think that bringing any participant in the Obama-era Coup Cabal that operated within the DOJ/FBI/Intelligence Community during 2015-2019 and still has remnants embedded in those agencies today to justice will be easy, theyd better think again.
That is the signal Clinton-appointed federal judge Emmet Sullivan is sending their way this week with his ongoing corrupt actions in the Soviet-style show trial of General Michael Flynn. After the DOJ moved to withdraw all charges against Flynn due to the rampant, heinous prosecutorial misconduct that has taken place throughout this three-year travesty of justice last Thursday, Sullivan has responded exactly the way he should have been expected to respond: With more judicial abuse of the defendant.
First, on Tuesday, Sullivan entered a minute order that allows the filing of Amicus briefs in the case, despite having repeatedly refused to accept hundreds of such briefs in support of Gen. Flynn during the course of the proceedings against him. Then, on Wednesday evening, the corrupt judge announced he was appointing a Trump-hating retired federal judge, fellow Clinton appointee John Gleeson to present arguments in opposition to the DOJs motion to dismiss the case. The appointment of Gleeson came just two days after Gleeson had penned a Washington Post op/ed piece slamming General Flynn.
So we can be sure he will be impartial in his service to the court, right? These Clinton/Obama judges are like a pack of cockroaches.
In that op/ed, Gleeson wrote, in part:
The Justice Departments move to dismiss the prosecution of former national security adviser Michael Flynn does not need to be the end of the case and it shouldnt be, Gleeson and two co-authors wrote in a recent opinion piece. The Justice Department has made conflicting statements to the federal judge overseeing the case, Emmet G. Sullivan. He has the authority, the tools and the obligation to assess the credibility of the departments stated reasons for abruptly reversing course.
To review, the DOJ reached its decision to dismiss after a U.S. Attorney in Missouri, Jeff Jensen, had conducted an exhaustive, 3-month review of the conduct by the FBI and DOJ/Mueller prosecutors in the case, and found a clear and indisputable pattern of rank and potentially criminal misconduct in what clearly was an effort to entrap and frame a 33-year veteran of the United States military.
Mr. Jensen, for those who may have missed it, is now a part of the Durham investigation, whose scope and staff continues to expand as more and more wrongdoing by Obama officials is unearthed.
With his moves of the past few days, Sullivan is sending a clear signal to Barr, Durham and Jensen that they are going to have to go through pure hell with the prosecution of any of those corrupt Obama officials if the trial ends up his court, the court of fellow corrupt Judge Amy Berman Jackson, and the court of any other federal judge who was appointed by Bill Clinton or Barack Hussein Obama His Own Self.
An impartial judge who hadnt been hugely compromised would have tossed this case more than two years ago, when it first became painfully obvious that Flynn was being railroaded. Yet here Sullivan still is, taking the most extreme measures possible to extend the abuse of a true American hero. The obvious signal that sends could not be more clear.
The two-step solution to this is now equally obvious: Pardon General Flynn and convene the military tribunals. The federal courts, like every other aspect of the federal government, have been hopelessly corrupted by the only existential threat our country has faced since the end of WWII: The Democrat Party.
That is all.
So youre in front of the Judge pleading guilty to a crime you didnt commit because the bad guys have a gun pointed at your childs head.
Thats perjury?
Remind me never to hire you as my attorney.
L
1) No one was holding a gun to anyone’s head, let alone in the next room. Your absurd exaggeration was necessary though (IMO) for you to make your point because actually describing the threat would have required a reasoned argument.
2) Flynn said under oath twice that his son’s case had nothing to do with his plea.
3) In the documents released by Covington there is a statement that the government explicitly refused to agree to not prosecute Flynn’s son as part of the plea. This is consistent with Flynn himself saying there was no promise.
4) If you plead guilty to protect your son, man up and protect your son, do not weasel out and later say I no longer wish to protect my son. Be a man, lie to protect your son or go to trial. Do not lie and then girlishly say later that you want to take back your lie. Be a man.
5) People plead guilty every day every where in America in order to protect family members. Almost 100% of those people are man enough to take their medicine, not cry like a little baby later.
people plead guilty when they are not all the time when there is fbi doj and defense counsel misconduct charging flynn with perjury would be a miscarriage of justice. doj says there never was a crime, at the time flynn pled did he know that methinks not..
if the judge cant see that the law needs to be changed...
That’s right. You went to court once and did a great job. So you convinced yourself you can render definitive legal opinions.
The area we are actually discussing is self-knowledge and humility.
By all means, the system needs to be changed. Until then, competent lawyers operate within reality, something Powell has incompetently not done.
I’m sorry, but your non-sequitur response is repulsive.
I have rendered no “legal opinions”, as I have never claimed to be a legal authority. I have stated my personal opinions. Your disdain notwithstanding, everyone has a right to form and express their personal opinions, even on legal matters, unless they are proffering legal advice.
I am quite surprised you would mention humility, as it is a subject with which you appear supremely ignorant of.
Have a great day, FRiend.
Odd that you keep bashing Sidney Powell, repeatedly.
You’ve said that ....
“She blundered her way into doing something she had the initial sense not to do: move to withdraw the plea”...
“Powell has been a disaster for Flynn and for MAGA. IMO she is a grifter selling books, just like the many grifters who took advantage of the Tea Party, always to the cheers of tea party members, who were too sincere and genuine to even suspect that fellow patriots were manipulating them for gain.”
You claim she didn’t move to withdraw Flynn’s guilty plea, but....there’s this...
FLYNN ATTORNEY SIDNEY POWELL FILES BRIEF TO DISMISS GUILTY PLEA OVER EGREGIOUS MISCONDUCT BY GOVERNMENT
Breaking General Flynn to withdraw guilty plea
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3808212/posts
Ex-Trump aide Michael Flynn seeks to withdraw guilty plea
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3808221/posts
Michael Flynn Withdraws Guilty Plea Cites DOJ bad faith, vindictiveness and breach of plea agreement
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3808233/posts
How The Governments Misstep Could Enable Michael Flynn To Withdraw His Guilty Plea
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3816498/posts
Your disdain for Powell is quite obvious.
Sidney Powell is a national treasure, as is Gen Mike Flynn.
Do you happen to work for Judge Emmet Sullivan? Just curious.
That’s no Judge he’s a pawn.
Ask Alcee Hastings, a federal judge, impeached by the House, removed from office. He went back to Florida aand the idiots there elected him to Congress.
The Attorney General should convene a federal grand jury to indict this out of control judge.
Flynn said under oath twice that his sons case had nothing to do with his plea.
Done under provable duress.
In the documents released by Covington there is a statement that the government explicitly refused to agree to not prosecute Flynns son as part of the plea.
Thus proving my point. Thanks.
L
I don't get it. What if he pled not guilty, and he WAS guilty. Isn't that also lying to the judge's face?
That doesnt look right - at all.Sullivan has already made his distaste for Flynn abundantly clear. If he doesnt have the sense to recuse himself, he ought to have it done for him.
I have yet to see the legal argument that Flynn did not lie to Sullivans face, in court, under oath, after Sullivan warned Flynn that Flynn could get in trouble for doing so.
What is that argument? Please, someone, anyone, Powell especially, tell us how Flynn did not lie to Sullivans face! And if Flynn lied to Sullivans face, how is it corrupt for Sullivan to hold Flynn in contempt?
A person who has been framed and set up is not entitled to a free pass to commit crimes as a result.
********************************************************
Well, Gratia, if youre going to continue your jihad against General Flynn you should also incorporate pursuit of subornation of perjury and conspiracy to suborn perjury charges against the FORMER (I.e., corrupt) prosecutors and the Mueller team members who were directing those prosecutors.
And this expanded pursuit of justice by you should be part of this current Judge Sullivan TRAVESTY! OK, jihad on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.