Also, the investigation is a good start! Secret Service should be the next in line at her door!
She threatened the President of the United States!
I thought it was impossible to be racist AND hate Trump /s
Well understand that she is a protected species. First of all she has a vagina, that right there gives her special protection. Second of all she is an "educator." That gives her even more protection. Thirdly she more than likely belongs to the teachers union, which will defend her to the very end of the earth.
As you can guess, NOTHING will ever come of it. This will disappear like a fart in the wind.
‘When Bednarz is not teaching English as a Second Language to middle schoolers, or offering to hire people to kill the president with biological warfare.’
speaking of English, this is not a complete English sentence...
If someone would do that to the President, what would they do to one of us?
Looks like a wuhan bat’s genes got mixed in with hers. What an ugly-a$$ piece of crap! It should be in a jail cell with kathy headchopper griffin.
***************
She threatened a Republican president. Nothing will happen to her. Under our new system of "justice" liberals are exempt from prosecution for anything.
Tried reading this.....reporter is incoherent
She is a protected minority. She is safe.
At least she as not a rodeo clown dressed as a president. That would have been real bad.
Buh bye Amy!
The depth of hate these people harbor actually affects their appearance. Have you noticed that for the most part raging Libs are almost repugnant to look at?
I would think action would lie against anyone who convinces someone else that "Donald Trump is the modern-day equivalent to Hitler.”You will say that the unanimous 1964 Warren Court New York Times Co. v. Sullivan decision forecloses that option. However, as Antonin Scalia pointed out, Sullivan is wrongly decided. In Sullivan, Justice Brennan (along with all other justices, concurring) asserted that
". . . libel can claim no talismanic immunity from constitutional limitations. It must be measured by standards that satisfy the First Amendment”. . . which sounds wonderful until you reflect that the sole purpose of the Bill of Rights was to assure the public that their rights were not compromised by the new Constitution. The Federalists had their fondest desire - a strong national government - within their grasp. All they had to do to keep it was to redeem their pledge to protect the rights - the existing rights of the people in the first amendments to the Constitution. Changing the rights of any person - risking controversy, just when their fondest hope was to tamp controversy down - was the furthest thing from their minds.Accordingly the First Amendment’s protection of the freedom of the press broke no new ground, and did not override or modify laws against libel (or, FTM, pornography). Trump should sue.
And, it strikes me, the one who should really sue is Steve Scalise. Boy, can he prove damages! FTM, every Republican at that ball field can, too.