Posted on 02/21/2020 4:09:20 AM PST by EyesOfTX
In terror the Boy ran toward the village shouting “Wolf! Wolf!” But though the Villagers heard the cry, they did not run to help him as they had before. “He cannot fool us again,” they said. – Aesop’s Fables, from “The Boy Who Cried Wolf.”
Up to 60% off Clothing at Kohl's Save up to 60% on clothing and homeware at Kohl's.com
It’s like clockwork, folks. – A truly, desperately bad event for the Democrat Party invariably results in a new false narrative coming out of the Party’s toadies in our corrupt news media.
The Party had a disastrous debate on Wednesday, during which everyone beat Mini-Mike Bloomberg to shreds and nobody laid a glove on President Donald Trump, leaving The Commie standing as the clear front-runner, and presto-change-o, we are back to Russia Collusion one more time!
On Thursday, the fake journalists at the corrupt New York Times published yet another narrative-setter piece for their Deep State masters, this one designed to support the Democrat Party’s plan to destroy voter confidence in the 2020 election results in advance. In case you’ve forgotten, the Democrats kicked off this particular plan way back in May of last year, as it became obvious that Quid Pro Joe was too impaired to become the Party’s standard bearer.
On May 6, Nancy Pelosi told reporters that “we cannot accept a second term…for Donald Trump…if we are going to be faithful to our democracy and to the Constitution of the United States. And that is just a fact.” Thus, she was already telegraphing her Party’s intent to destroy faith in the 2020 elections and to refuse to accept their results. That theme has been an ever-present part of Democrat Party/media messaging since that time, and was the main theme in the idiotic impeachment effort that held our country hostage for five long months.
Also participating in this neverending coup d’etat effort is our intelligence community, as we well know. The Times piece in question focuses on a briefing that outgoing Acting Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Joseph Maguire held on Capitol Hill recently, in which he and a whole passel of his loyal lieutenants informed congress of their belief that – get this – the “Russians” favor President Trump’s re-election over communist Bernie Sanders, and are already working to help Mr. Trump’s cause.
Oh yeah, sure, that’s totally believable. You betcha.
Nowhere in the Times piece will you find a single smidgen of detail about exactly what it is that Maguire claims the “Russians” (why doesn’t he just say it’s the boogeyman instead – it would have equal credibility at this point) are doing to “help” the Trump campaign. That would be because the “Russians” aren’t really doing anything in any organized fashion to do that, outside of the kinds of stuff they have been doing to meddle in our elections for the last 100 years.
The thought that these “Russians” would favor the election of Donald Trump over the eternally grifting Hillary Clinton in 2016 wasn’t absurd enough for these people. Now, we are supposed to believe that they are helping Trump to defeat an out-and-out communist ideologue.
Think about it: Vladimir Putin, more than anyone else on the face of the earth, fully understands the society-destroying impacts of socialist/communist ideology. He lived it. Putin – if our corrupt intelligence agencies are to be believed – wants to destroy and dominate the U.S. and other Western democracies. What better way to achieve that than by helping a freaking communist get elected President of the United States? The whole charade here is an absolute farce.
The opening paragraph of the piece is greatest part of it:
Intelligence officials warned House lawmakers last week that Russia was interfering in the 2020 campaign to try to get President Trump re-elected, five people familiar with the matter said, a disclosure to Congress that angered Mr. Trump, who complained that Democrats would use it against him.
Note the reference to “five people familiar with the matter”, none of whom are of course identified. Did the Times really talk to “five people” who had first-hand knowledge of this briefing? There is no way to know. But saying “five people” rather than “a person” is the Times way of trying to give the piece more credibility.
Then there’s my favorite part, the one about how the “disclosure to Congress that angered Mr. Trump, who complained that Democrats would use it against him.”
Um, doesn’t the very existence of this report in the New York Times clearly demonstrate that the President was right? Didn’t he have every right to be angered that Maguire, a freaking temp in his job, chose to spread this crap as a parting gift to the Administration as he prances out the door, no doubt about to get a big book deal or a contract as a contributor on CNN or MSNBC?
Now, do you understand why the President is intent on putting someone he can actually trust into the DNI position? What Maguire – and his aide Shelby Pierson, whom the Times claims delivered the report to the members of congress – did is an outright betrayal, an outrage that should be punished by their immediate firings.
But the damage is done, and the Democrat/media narrative is set: Bereft of any other viable alternatives or viable presidential candidates to really challenge President Trump, the Axis of Disinformation goes back to pushing the Russia Collusion BS one more time. They will now poll-test and focus group public reactions to the new narrative, and if they think it has any legs, they will continue to pound it day after day right up until November 3. Because this is what these people do, and this is who they are.
Yes, it’s despicable. Yes, it’s depraved. Yes, it’s disgusting and demented and disloyal to our nation and destructive to our Republic. But, really, after the last four years, did you expect anything else?
That is all.
The Russians could be meddling, but if they are, Trump is not who they are trying to help. Their political soul-mates reside on the Rat side of the aisle.
Sheesh, they ran this on CBS this morning as their “lead” and then beat it like a dead horse. I’m resting up because I am going to revel in their losses and group misery come election night.
Not this garbage again. Ask any liberal how exactly the Russians interfered with the election beyond claiming they took out ads on Facebook they can come up with NOTHING.
This is ridiculous. It is up to an organization to keep its IT infrastructure secure. In the case of the DNC they have had ~4 years to harden their systems and procedures..
As I said before, absolutely nobody is going to buy this BS again. They needed to come up with a different scare story this time but were too stupid and lazy to keep from just rehashing their fearmongering BS from last time.
I was trying to find the article where the Chinese admit to their intention to influence the election for Democrats but of course Google removed it and is pushing Russian collusion on their top results.
I did not vote in 2016. I wasn’t quite sold on a reality TV guy who engaged in petty theatrics. By the time of the election, I regretted not registering and being able to vote for Trump. What tipped the scales was all of the media bullying, coupled with Carlos Danger’s laptop. What really changed me into a full Trump supporter was the day on Dec 16 when the Russia hoax was foisted on us. I saw it as complete bs with crooked Hillary’s handprints all over it. That was the last straw. Trust me. Not every democrat will be willing to lap up the poorly assembled “Russia Hoax Part Deux” Also, since the election, the corporate media keeps destroying their own credibility at an accelerated rate, as they rile more and more previous media worshipping viewers.
Gutfeld: Digging up the Russia corpse has as much credibility as Jussie Smolett claiming MAGA people committed a new hate crime.
yet the FEDS won’t tell us exactly WHAT the ruskies doing to that end.
Well, both they and we get involved in the other side’s politics, but they pretend this kind of thing has never happened before. And guess what? Trumps approval went up, but I won’t say “Thanks, Deep State and media.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.