Posted on 01/18/2020 5:12:42 AM PST by PJ-Comix
In what is not really a surprise, Politico is looking at the trade deal with China through the lens of impeachment. According to Anita Kumar on Wednesday, the trade deal, which she labeled as "modest," is merely a distraction from impeachment. In fact, that is exactly what the title of her article says, "Trump hypes modest China deal, distracting from impeachment."
If you still didn't get the Politico message that the trade deal is supposedly about diverting attention away from impeachment, Kumar emphasizes that talking point in the very first sentence:
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Democrats submit bogus impeachment charges to distract from the strong economy.
Politico hype impeachment to distract from Trump’sChina trade deal.
Propagandico is the biggest POS fake-news utterly biased leftwing creepshow.
Politico makes crap up in order to distract from the corrupt dim losers...but it’s not working.
No one cares about impeachment, you morons.
No one is trying to distract from it, you liars.
The only ones being hurt by it are you.
You’re going to wear the scarlet letter “I”, and no one else.
Ignore all the noise and look at his works. Would any other President(R) have accomplished as much? Looking back maybe Reagan, and that's about it.
Politico: Trump Makes Economy Boom To Distract From Impeachment.
Anita KUMAR’s bio is nothing more than bouncing from left wing “ journalism” to another.
Absolutely ZERO background in economics, yet she can opine on the China trade deal.
Just another Affirmative Action Jackson
Someone who’s fairly pro-China called it a complete win for Trump:
This was her response to Soleimani’s death:
Slick Willy fired missiles and endangered troops to delay his impeachment vote a few days in a desperate attempt to turn the public (media) opinion against impeachment.
Modest deal is expected to increase GDP from about .5 to .75 and the difference between a GDP of 2% to 2.75% is a full 37.5 percent.
That is hundreds of billions of dollars of increased American economic activity and we all benefit.
If several hundred billion dollars is modest, what does the writer consider a significant deal?
Sleazeball Media:
Anything Obama did was “unprecedented”, “amazing”, or “strong leadership”
Anything Trump does is “modest”, “ordinary”, “nothing special”
Got it. No bias here at all!!!
From her tweet:
“China will not be able to avoid being dragged into a war over Soleimani’s assassination”
I’m no foreign policy expert but that sounds a little crazy.
I guess the market is easily distracted. It seemed to react to the “modest” deal.
Ahh, I love the smell of alternate reality in the morning. It smells like, desperation.
Its the first rational trade pact with China that actually takes America’s strategic interests into account and takes the first steps at addressing China’s predatory trade and monetary policies and practices. All previous trade pacts were sell outs that set the stage for the economic decline of the United States.
Furthermore, Trumps trade policies are critical to future global stability because they will force China to curb it’s aggressive, neo Imperialist policy to build a military capable of dominating Asia via force and intimidation while at the same time forcing China to focus on developing its economy to benefit the Chinese people, the vast majority of whom have been left out of Chinas economic explosion.
Who ya’ gonna believe? Politico or the S&P 500 average?
She’s a liberal hack
Good post
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.