Posted on 12/26/2019 8:19:09 AM PST by Red Badger
This is interesting. Why have we not heard this before?
The Gateway Pundit received an email from a self described cyber expert who claims there is no way that Crowdstrike could have identified Russia as the entity who hacked the DNC before the 2016 election. The reason is because no entity, including Crowdstrike, has software that can identify a hacker. Crowdstrike’s only out is to prove that their software can identify hackers and they can’t.
Here are parts from an email that was forwarded to the Gateway Pundit and a group of other top conservative websites:
As we work to prepare for the Durham showdown, we have for too long searched for a simplified explanation the people could understand on the Russian Hacking Hoax which is a story that has a shelf life and will be weaponized (again) for 2020.
The emailer suggests that Donna Brazile may be the one who leaked the DNC emails to press. She did leak debate questions after all. The emailer suggests the key is Crowdstrike:
Crowdstrike is nothing more than THERANOS (Google it.) on steroids. The company [Crowdstrike] claimed their antivirus software could not only find a hack, but could tell you WHO was responsible. This is false. Malware is just a series of text files. If you open the file and see Beatles Lyrics, that does not in any way make a case for attribution. It is that simple. Just like THERANOS, they don’t have a working product. Never did. I can show you the proof of that in a live demonstration.
Crowdstrike is guilty of fraud, investor fraud, stock fraud and a myriad of other charges that mirror the fact patterns in the THERANOS case. Remember, the day they went public, it was to the tune of $6.3 billion.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
p
Why is the server in Ukraine? The Ukraine shares a border with the accused hackers the Russians.
Seth Rich
The existence of a server or any networking hardware in another country is not proof of origin. Likewise, blocking domains or CIDR blocks does not make an entity immune to hacking from the blocked foreign entity.
There are millions of compromised computers around the word, and any one of those systems could be used as a proxy or a beachhead. Crowdstrike can’t prove origin. They may be able to prove that an attack was launched from a specific region of the world, but where the actual attacker was based will never be known.
Seth Rich didn’t kill himself.....................and neither did Epstein...............
Crowdstrike was mentioned in Trump’s phone call.
Has never been questioned by the leftwing media or Schiff.
I believe this alarms them more than the Biden corruption,
It is more basic than that. Many tech experts have noted that the download speed from the DNC server was more than 10 gigabytes per second. We do not have that internet capacity yet. It couldn’t be a hack. Had to be done by someone in the building with the server.
Unless the Russians were given free passes to DNC headquarters.
If Crowdstrike worked, why are hospitals, and other businesses still receiving ransom ware? Seems they could easily stop the extortions if the ability existed. Here we are almost four years later and we still don’t have the ability to do what they were claiming to do then.
It does. The MSM will not mention it, at all.
Crowdstrike is the KEY TO EVERYTHING.
They know that.
Once the information is made public, it’s GAME OVER.....................
Does Crowdstrike have a corporate presence in the USA?
I wish I could remember the numerous threads here on FR that thoroughly debunked CrowdStrike's "report" that "proved" the DNC was hacked by Russians.
Myself and several other Computer Security Professionals here on FR ripped their report to shreds. In fact, their entire report was a cut-and-paste job from CompSec 101 manuals easily found on the Internet, and several "System Administrator 101" guides as well.
Some of us found the actual publications they plagerized from (matching exact wording) while others proved it was impossible for the Russians to download the tens of gigabytes of data in mere minutes, as Crowdstrike said happened.
It's been long known here on FR that CrowdStrike isn't only a joke, several high-level DNC funders have relationships and huge money in CrowdStrike.
NO ONE should take anything coming from that alleged computer security forensics firm seriously. Not then, not now.
Where can I read more about how we know the download bitrate for the hack was 10+ Gb/s? You’re right; if that’s true, this was not a remote hack. Thanks.
There is no one server - there were more than a dozen that were affected - and none of them are or were in Ukraine.
The media, communists and dull Democrat voters all believe our gov’t confirmed that Russia hacked the DNC server.
That is not true at all.
FACT: The FBI never touched the DNC Server because the DNC would not allow them to examine it.
FACT: The FBI never read the Crowdstrike report alleging that Russia hacked the DNC server....the FBI only read the summary.
Given the fraud on the FISA warrants, it is highly probable that the Russian hack was not true, but helped support the growing lie about Trump/Russia.
I think everyone is missing the point.
It’s NOT whether or not Crowdstrike is or is not correct, which obviously they are not, nor could be given the level of technology that would be required to accomplish their assertions.
It’s what Crowdstrike represents and why.
They are essentially being used as a cover-up for murder................
Carter page again. Naval intelligence, CIA, lots of Russian contacts. He was the perfect vehicle to allow the FBI to do all the spine they wanted on thousands of people in the Trump campaign. It’s almost like he was placed there deliberately for that very purpose. I don’t trust that smirking POS. I think he was deliberately placed in the campaign by the CIA for the FBI to use for that purpose.
If the plan to derail Trump succeeded in Hillary won, he would have gone back to the CIA and no one would have ever known the name Carter page.
Noticed two things about him. When he testified to Congress he reported how he carefully advised the Trump campaign of every Russian contact he ever had. That was meant to make it look like Trump was okay with Russia supposedly interfering.
And two, the Mueller investigation climb through everyone’s life and found everything they’ve done wrong since third grade. But they looked at Carter page, spent about eight hours talking to him, and decided that he had done nothing wrong. He’s one of the only people to escape the Mueller investigation with no charges.
The fact that you learned didn’t charge him with a single thing should tell you something. And it’s not the Carter page is innocent. That POS was placed into the campaign by the CIA solely for the FBI to use to obtain fisa.
That’s all misdirection, smoke and mirrors, gas-lighting, whatever you want to call it.
It’s all part of the cover for Seth Rich’s murder......................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.