MUELLER’S REPORT IN THE HANDS OF PIRANHAS PELOSI,
SCHIFF AND NADLER IMPERILS OUR SAFETY AND SECURITY
AMERICANS DEMAND ASSURANCES THEIR SAFETY AND SECURITY IS PROTECTED
NO DEMOCRAT SEES THE MUELLER REPORT UNTIL THESE CONDITIONS ARE MET:
<><> handover all communications from Obama WRT the Trump campaign;
<><> the public release of any and all communication about the decision not to indict Hillary Clinton.
<><> the appointment of a special counsel to investigate the particulars into Hillary Clinton’s email use;
<><> the release of all Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act applications related to Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.
<><> release of all opposition research the pee dossier compiled against candidate Trump;
<><> list the number of spies sent into the Trump campaign;
<><> a compilation of false accusations made against the Trump campaign;
<><> the release of all communications regarding the Obama apparat’s decision to promote fake allegations against the president;
<><> detailed legal assessment into whether there was misuse of elected office;
<><> a complete list of all the actors who constructed the Russian-collusion fairy tale;
<><> testimony under oath of Obama-era CIA Director John Brennan;
<><> testimony under oath of Obama’s former Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper.
.
“Mueller declined to rule on”
I thought Mueller was supposed to be a prosecutor, not a judge. And not even that, a “Special Counsel”. He was in no position to make “rulings”.
“What you saw here is simply Mueller saying, ‘You know what? I’m going to let Barr call this one,’” Mulvaney said, discussing the final report on Mueller’s 22-month probe with host Jonathan Karl on ABC’s “This Week.”
Don’t think this was a very smart thing to say.
Claiming obstruction while at the same time saying innocent of collusion wouldn’t go over very well. What the hell did he obstruct?
There was no crime to be covered up.
“He kept tweeting he was innocent!” Isn’t obstruction.
Absolutely...and that’s why he left the opening in his statement.
Mulvaney is correct. No obstruction according to either the SC or AG.
Trump should have had a White House ceremony with Muller, and asked him whether or not he was guilty of collusion or obstruction. With Jim Acosta asking follow ups, then Trump slamming him with the truth. :)