Check it out bags MSM is pissed that it didn’t leak that Huber has been investigating Hillary
“It strains credulity to believe that the Justice Department didn’t know about this letter when they swore under penalty of perjury that it didn’t exist–you don’t exactly forget about a formal directive to investigate Hillary Clinton signed by Jeff Sessions,” he added.
“The fact that they only ‘found’ it the same week Matthew Whitaker was heading for the exit makes it hard to see DOJ’s previous denial as anything but a deliberate attempt to conceal…….”
“Sessions and Whitaker shouldn’t escape accountability by skipping town.” —
We understand now why we've been targeted daily by the FAKE NEWS media and SHILLS? TODAY THEY ARE LEARNING THE TRUTH. You have been prepared for what is about to take place. DARK TO LIGHT. ENJOY THE SHOW! WWG1WGA!!!
Now that is some...ahem...reporting.
No when. (a month ago? a year ago?)
No who. (name names, damn it! who is "they", specifically?)
No where. (where was this sworn testimony given?)
We do have the what. (it (the letter) didn’t exist)
The only thing left is...deep, sucking intake of breath...WHY!
No help there either.
Which lawyer?
Which court?
Which senior officials?
Sessions directs prosecutors to 'evaluate certain issues' involving Uranium One and Clinton, leaves door open on special counsel November 13, 2017
Attorney General Jeff Sessions directed senior federal prosecutors to evaluate “certain issues” requested by congressional Republicans, involving the sale of Uranium One and alleged unlawful dealings related to the Clinton Foundation, leaving the door open for an appointment of another special counsel.
In a letter first obtained by Fox News, the Justice Department responded to July 27 and September 26 requests from House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., and other committee members, who called for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate the matters in question.
Look how close the wording is here compared to the Sessions letter at the link...
“The Attorney General has directed senior federal prosecutors to evaluate certain issues raised in your letters,” Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd wrote.
“These senior prosecutors will report directly to the Attorney General and the Deputy Attorney General [Rod Rosenstein], as appropriate, and will make recommendations as to whether any matters not currently under investigation should be opened, whether any matters currently under investigation require further resources, or whether any matters merit the appointment of a Special Counsel,” Boyd wrote.
The Justice Department does not ordinarily confirm or deny investigations, and Boyd wrote that “this letter should not be construed to do so.”
Only now when heads might begin to roll (figuratively) do they care.
Still looking for who is supposed to have denied in court that the Sessions letter didn't exist.
As you may remember, last March, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions informed Congress that he had asked John Huber, a U.S. attorney in Utah, to "evaluate" issues of concern to House Republicans.
In that March 29 letter, Sessions wrote that at the conclusion of Huber’s review, Huber would recommend “whether any matters not currently under investigation should be opened; whether any matters currently under investigation require further resources; or whether any matters merit the appointment of a Special Counsel.”
According to Jon Solomon, the Rep. Meadows and his subcommittee now want to learn what Huber has been doing.
So now we have Sessions' letter and we have Boyd's letter.
Still looking for where somebody is supposed to have lied in court about the letter to Huber not existing.
It sure would be nice if the original reporting had given a name. /sarcasm
So why would someone lie in court?
Am I seeing a pattern here? Fake news, anyone?