Posted on 02/10/2019 9:33:39 AM PST by Based Newsman
Lindsay Graham said the same thing this morning.
The Dems DO NOT want the President to leave a PERMANENT barrier in any way, shape or form.....despite the fact that people like Obama, Schumer, Hillary etc all voted for a border wall in 2006.
OH SH*T, SPACE MARINES, YO! BREAK YO SEF, FOO!
What a great pic!
Waiting for all the Trump caved whiners to hit this thread in 3..2..1..
(thank you for posting all of that)
So now we see the light at the end of the tunnel ... the National Emergency is too controversial, even among Republicans - but by moving around funding, Trump can get this cleanly done and Dems can’t do squat about it ...
“end game”
(except for the CNN shouting)
And HERE is the actual Fox News Sunday link, without having to look at your personal click-bait factory:
President Trump realizes that the wall has to be built because that is what he was elected to do. He knows from his executive experience that how hard he tried and how viciously the uniparty opposed him won’t get him re-elected.
We may lose the country while everyone is posturing and dithering around trying to make a deal.
The democrats, and some Republicans, will not ever, will absolutely never agree to funding a wall — unless a corresponding compromise will be made by Trump that completely negates the wall.
At some point, and it has to be real soon, a hard line has to be drawn in the sand, with the full force of the government enforcing it, with whatever means is necessary.
I’m personally leaning toward declaring marital law at the border. If Trump were to get full funding for the entire wall, by the time it is constructed there will be multiple millions of illegals entering before it can be constructed.
Actually, I think the Donks want the President to build the wall and try to use it against him in 2020 accusing him of being a divider and not a uniter. They just don’t want to be seen as cooperating with him by giving him money. So if he can get any money out of the House, no matter how little, he can counter by saying the funding, even if the majority of it is not specifically funded by the House, was bi-partisan.
“indicating the White House is prepared to accept a deal from Congress that doesn’t fully meet the president’s full $5.7 billion border request.”
no it doesn’t indicate that Trump is prepared to accept any deal of any kind. All he said was Trump can use other monies to get the Wall built.
“I’m personally leaning toward declaring marital law at the border. “
#metoo. There’s a full on invasion going on. Trump has total/plenary authority to stop it but for some reason(advisors, GOP, etc), he’s not doing it. 2 years ago was too late.
And the EO was already signed 12/21/17 ... ever since it’s been a bit here, a bit there, some troops here, some troops there, over & over, again & again, time after time, with ever increasing results, all under the radar & full speed ahead :)
Take the $$$$$ from those anti-Trump alphabet agencies!!!They all have discretionary funds allocated. Take them first.
Hint, use “lawfully” instead of legally.
The point being, the Congress cash can begin building the Wall, and about the time that 2 billion is exhausted, the EA76 money will have beaten back the court challenges and be freed up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.