No.
Get a job.
Well............ Let it drop already!
According to sources, its expected to be as damaging as the Nunez memo...
Conservative talk show host and constitutional law expert Mark Levin has said that he believes Barack Obama himself must have known Hillary Clinton paid for the dossier which the FBI then used to secure the warrant.
—
Plan A for the MSM is to ignore the story. If that doesn’t work they’ll switch to plan B to say it was done to protect the country. Plan C would be to claim it’s old news.
“About to drop...” and “have been requested by Republicans”... and never the twain shall meet.
Wake me when it’s over.
But many indicators show that his enemies are closing in around him, not the other way around.
Of course they are making wrong, fake, specious, phony, lying, false charges against him.
But with our communist media and our corrupt judiciary, our criminal legislative class, and stupid, corrupt electorate (read: jury pool), it doesn't matter.
Mr. Trump: YOU DON'T HAVE A HECK OF A LOT MORE TIME to use whatever chips you have. I suggest you start NOW.
Flame away anyone who wishes. It is time for us to start scoring some big points against these seditious Rats.
Just do it!! Now the maniacs are most probably on a search for a rogue judge to stop any release of this information.
And it will be ignored completely cause gives a damn what the previous president did. He’s out, the moving hand having written has moved on.
It will be redacted, no doubt. Trump should release the whole report.
The Washington Free Beacon reported that “the Obama administration skirted key U.S. sanctions to grant Iran access to billions in hard currency despite public assurances the administration was engaged in no such action, according to a new congressional investigation.”
And it gets even worse: “The investigation, published Wednesday by the House Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, further discloses secret efforts by top Obama administration officials to assure European countries they would receive a pass from U.S. sanctions if they engaged in business with Iran.”
This revelation comes after the news that came to light in February, that, according to Bill Gertz in the Washington Times, “the U.S. government has traced some of the $1.7 billion released to Iran by the Obama administration to Iranian-backed terrorists in the two years since the cash was transferred.”
There is a law that applies to this situation. U.S. Code 2381 says: “Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”
In a sane political environment, Barack Obama would be tried for treason. But Leftist Privilege will prevent him from ever being held accountable.(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
==========================================
In a sane political environment, Barack Obama would be tried for treason. Obama has planted seeds that will be bearing bitter fruit for years, and probably decades, to come. He is, without any doubt, the worst President in American history. But there is one thing Barack Obama has on all previous competitors: treason.
Obama showered hundreds of billions of tax dollars on the Islamic Republic of Iran. There are those who say, “It was their money. It belonged to the Iranian government but was frozen and not paid since 1979.” Indeed, and there was a reason for that: not even Jimmy Carter, who made the Islamic Republic of Iran possible, thought that money, which had been paid by the Shah’s government in a canceled arms deal, belonged to the mullahs who overthrew the Shah. Likewise Reagan, George H. W. Bush, Clinton, and George W. Bush all thought that the Islamic Republic was not due money that was owed to the Shah.
Only Barack Obama did.
The definition of treason is giving aid and comfort to the enemy. The leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran order their people to chant “Death to America” in mosques every Friday, and repeatedly vow that they will ultimately destroy the United States of America and the state of Israel. How was giving them billions and helping them skirt sanctions applied by the U.S. government not treason? Other Presidents have been incompetent, corrupt, dishonest, but which has committed treason on a scale to rival the treason of Barack Obama?
The Iranians also operate a global network of jihad terror organizations, one of which, Hizballah, is quite active in Mexico now, with the obvious ultimate intention of crossing the border and committing jihad massacres of Americans. Obama has given a tremendous boost to these initiatives, as well as to Iran’s nuclear program, with his nuclear deal that has given the Iranians hundreds of billions of dollars and essentially a green light to manufacture nuclear weapons, in exchange for absolutely nothing.
There is no telling when the worst consequences of Obama’s aid and comfort to the Islamic Republic of Iran will be felt. But they likely will be felt in one way or another. Even as President Trump moves swiftly to restore sanctions and put Iran on notice that its nuclear activity and global adventurism will not be tolerated, those billions cannot be recovered, and the Iranians have already spent a great deal for their jihad cause.
However this catastrophe plays out, there is one man who will suffer no consequences whatsoever: Barack Obama. That’s Leftist Privilege. It’s good to be a powerful Leftist in Washington nowadays. Laws? Pah! Laws are for conservatives.
We’ve been told this before and nothing happened. About three months ago we were led to believe that “immediate declassification” was imminent. We were played.
I’ll believe it when I see it.
The Hill article, from which this has been ripped off, is here:
Posted on FR:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3710881/posts
If a fake check were printed on plain notebook paper, I would question why the teller accepted it.
Who were these judges, who willingly accepted the dossier as if it were legitimate. Were they politically complicit or careless. Someone should be asking what could compel a judge to accept the dossier as justification. Could they have been pressured to comply. Do they have a skeleton or 2 that they do not want revealed. Should Congress be interviewing them to find out who was pressuring them to authorize a warrant.
Of course it will drop, (be dropped) like everything else Democrats do.
This headline could have been from any time in the last two years. We’re always on the verge of finding out
And yet, only 5% of the U.S. will hear about it.
The quality of an elected government will never exceed the quality of the press.
I still want to know if the judge was told that the warrant could/would be used to spy on the whole Trump campaign????
HRC had all that intel about Trump and still lost. LOL
What will FBI director and the TEMP AG do about it?