(((AG)))@Twitter Utterly Debunks Latest NBC Smear Against Kavanaugh

Twitter ^ | 10/1/2018 | (((AG)))

[mojito]

...I just got home and see a DM about a new breaking story from NBC that supposedly makes Kavanaugh look bad. I see every reporter in my timeline tweeting it so I decide to check it out.

[....]

The story suggests that based on second-hand texts between two people who know Kavanaugh, he was seeking evidence to exonerate himself from an allegation from Debbie Ramirez.

Again, no evidence he is asking anyone to lie or do anything wrong. Just exonerate him.

[mojito]

Another day, more fake news.

[cnsmom]

does anyone really trust the FBI? not if my life depended on it..

[originalbuckeye]

Kavanaugh was seeking EVIDENCE??? Obviously not a Dem!

[djf]

Why should we trust them?
If they don’t find anything, the Dems will bitch, whine, moan, rail, etc etc etc etc on and on Ad Nauseum about how incompetent the FBI is.
If the FBI DOES find anything, then how does that make them look after SIX PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS FAILED TO FIND EVEN A SPECK OF EVIDENCE?

I feel sorry for Kavanaugh, and if I were him, I’d tell the Dems in no uncertain terms to get f*cked, they win, and he doesn’t want anything at all to do with government!

This is what happens when you ask too much of government. Cameras in the meeting rooms when sessions are underway. This is the meaning of a democracy versus a republic. No republic can withstand the twitter option.

[Parley Baer]

This fake news will go on all week.

[Bshaw]

Friday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday

Three days left until this crap ends! VOTE ALREADY!!!

[blueplum]

Ramirez was the one making the calls. Others who knew BK made a few of their own to find out if anyone even knew her and what her story was.

As I posted earlier, from The Daily Caller, all of her witnesses have denied any such event, including her bestie roommate and friend, who said Ramirez never mentioned anything of the sort to her.

we’re up to 6 bunnyboilers and counting. Who knew they were so common?

[blueplum]

july? and/or ‘friends’ ? wasn't that about the time of the 6th background check? A Yale classmate said that when BK was announced as a pick, ‘everybody’ was talking to (phoning/texting) each other about how cool - their classmate was making it to the Supremes. Ramirez was also making calls - trying to convince her bestie roommate and two other witnesses she named to collaborate.

But just like the last one, the bestie and the two named men denied any knowledge of any such incident. Leaving the accuser out in the cold with her lying. The accuser who refused to meet with the Senate, preferring the media and insisting on a FBI investigation. See a pattern here? Maybe she thought that the penalty for lying to the FBI was not as bad as lying to the US Senate?