Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/14/2018 5:46:02 AM PDT by EyesOfTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: EyesOfTX
If Sessions and Horowitz really do have an end game, it’s time to get to it

It'a not time yet. It is too far from November.

2 posted on 07/14/2018 5:50:10 AM PDT by arthurus (gl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Magoo's end game


3 posted on 07/14/2018 5:59:25 AM PDT by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

I have a mental image of Uncle Sam in an intensive care bed. Hovering over him with a pillow, looking a lot like Rosenstein, is a character representing the Swamp. Asleep in the visitor’s chair, chin on chest, is Jeff Sessions.

(Ben Garrison. Are you reading? You have my permission to use this, rights free.)


4 posted on 07/14/2018 6:11:19 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck ( Socialism consumes EVERYTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

The incredible shrinking AG.


5 posted on 07/14/2018 6:15:18 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (My "White Privilege" is my work ethic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

They are now letting Mueller interfere with Trump’s foreign policy. It is getting out of control.


9 posted on 07/14/2018 7:41:36 AM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

I agree

Drain the damn swamp already!!


12 posted on 07/14/2018 8:32:00 AM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

would be nice if they even had a beginning game- seems they are paralyzed by fear or opposition to this president


14 posted on 07/14/2018 9:18:59 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

You could have snipped out the bit about the LGBTQueers pressuring the straight actress to give up her movie role. It was completely non sequitur to this article.

There’s no rule saying you must excerpt from the top.


15 posted on 07/14/2018 10:11:12 AM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX
If Sessions and Horowitz really do have an end game, it’s time to get to it

The game never started. Sessions recused himself a year and a half ago.

And Sessions has left Rosenstein in charge of stonewalling all Deep State matters.

16 posted on 07/14/2018 10:16:25 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

Their end game is to put Trump and his entire family in prison for 400 years.


30 posted on 07/14/2018 6:29:53 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EyesOfTX

“The bottom line is this: If Sessions, Rosenstein, Horowitz and President Trump truly have been executing some grand Machiavellian scheme to ultimately bring all the Obama-era bad actors to justice, they’d better get to the end game very quickly. Because if you’re in danger of losing people like me, yo.”

You say there are two schools of thought to explain Sessions’ inaction: either Sessions has a grand plan or he is compromised.

I say there is a third possibility - that the premise of Sessions’ inaction is faulty.

What if Trump decided early on that he (and Sessions) should NOT make it their mission to “bring all the Obama-era bad actors to justice”?

What if Trump decided early on to measure success in other ways, like regulatory and tax reform, renegotiating lousy trade deals and defense treaties, placing constitutional conservatives on the courts, securing the borders, reforming energy policy, disenfranchising corrupt cheap labor lobbies, discrediting the Left’s MSM and Hollywood political correctness propaganda machines... [I could go on listing Trump’s way-beyond-wildest-dreams-successes, but you get the point].

What if bringing all the Obama-era bad actors to justice is just not that important to Trump? What if he’d rather focus on positive change for the future -MAGA? What if he considers the agenda of punishing Democrats backward-looking, negative and politically unwise?

You might not like it, but you have to admit it would explain a lot. Trump made us all very happy with his “because you’d be in jail” debate zinger, but he sure doesn’t show any tangible sign of carrying out that threat - not even close.

I think doing so would be very bad politics. Voters didn’t reward Republicans for going after Clinton, and they won’t reward Democrats for trying to impeach Trump. Voters want positive change and an end to corruption, but they mostly don’t attempts to criminalize politics.

You and me would love to see Demcrats serve time for their crimes, by we are a minority - face it - Trump is wise to stay away from anything that looks like political retribution.

Trump is doing great with his positive agenda and the people are responding favorably. Trump is headed for a reelection landslide and the democrats are self-destructing before our very eyes. Why mess with success by trying to throw his political enemies in jail, when there is a very real risk it would put him in a bad light?

Wouldn’t it reinforce every fear the Left raised about Trump?

I think Trump has no intention of attempting to throw Obama-era bad actors in jail, and THAT is why Sessions is not pursuing that agenda, and THAT is why Sessions still has his job.


33 posted on 07/15/2018 4:00:04 AM PDT by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson