Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hollywood Women Invalidate Themselves In Supporting Samantha Bee
Red State ^ | 1 June 2018 | Brad Slager

Posted on 06/02/2018 2:00:01 PM PDT by Rummyfan

Consider for a moment all the weepy hand-wringing we have witnessed from Hollywood for the past eight months. How women have been degraded, subjugated, and used as sexual pawns. It is a grievous and dangerous environment that needs to be changed, and we all have a responsibility to repair this. Also — a late night comedienne is free to say anything she wants about conservative females, because they don’t count.

Let’s just admit the facts, as they have been laid out in blatant fashion this week: we live in a contentious and bilious era. The combination of political saturation, anonymity-fueled social media, and the hyper-competitiveness of the diluted news industry means that every story is amplified, every opinion is blared, and every hot take is deemed a force of power.

All of this has led to a coarsening of not just our culture but all of our interpersonal interactions. What is paradoxical in this is that with an almost infinitely wide landscape of ideas we are seeing a stark bisection of our collective mindset; we all must be aligned in one of only two encampments, for some reason. Any innocuous comment is measured and instantly decreed to place you in one camp, or the other, by rote. It is as if every element of society has to first be dropped into a paper shredder that has one blade.

This reactionary cataloging of positions, ideas and people will inevitably lead to rampant contradictions. With that, enter our media complex. It was with surprising speed that the press went from lecturing this country how the degraded comments by Roseanne Barr were unacceptably crude (and represented conservatives who became crude by extension) to then being faced with the needlessly vile comment from Samantha Bee regarding a picture Ivanka Trump took embracing her child.

The national journalists went through a process of a few outlets hailing Bee, to mostly silence, to then reporting on the controversy but not so much the content. What was absent however was the scolding of what is proper and decent. Also missing was the attachment of Bee’s hatred to a wide swath of Americans. Then throughout the day a variety of luminaries weighed in on the controversy. It was remarkable.

Actress Sally Field offered up a response to the issue:

I like Samantha Bee a lot, but she is flat wrong to call Ivanka a cunt.

C**** are powerful, beautiful, nurturing and honest.

Additionally, actress Mini Driver had this to contribute to the discussion:

That was the wrong word for Samantha Bee to have used . But mostly because ( to paraphrase the French ) Ivanka has neither the warmth nor the depth.

Glib words of support for Samantha Bee’s vitriolic vaginal invective. This is rather amazing, considering the environment that Hollywood currently finds itself mired in. For at least eight months now the entertainment industry has grappled with the fallout of the Harvey Weinstein story. We have watched a parade of performers take to the microphones, red carpets, award ceremonies, and most any other outlet to announce the need to support women.

Let us not forget the rest of Bee’s degradation. Beyond her uterine euphemism the hostess also suggested that Ivanka dress provocatively and seduce her father into changing policy. Remember now — for more than half of a year Hollywood has been wailing about and railing against the practice of women being professional sex objects. Then overnight they come out in support of a media figure suggesting a prominent woman treat herself as a sex object. It defies explanation.

Today celebrities — actresses — are coming forward to essentially declare that some women just have it coming. After more than half a year pleading with us to fix the problems that women are facing we now learn that our cultural elite believe certain women deserve to be degraded. Staggering to consider, after Hollywood and the media have been posturing the need to eliminate this very poison.

It was in 2015, when Hillary Clinton was launching her Presidential run, that a list of banned words was issued that should not be used when writing about the female candidate. Innocuous terms like “ambitious”, and “inevitable” were said to be forbidden for carrying sexist overtones. In just three years we now see the media defending vulgar epithets as acceptable in describing a prominent female in politics.

But this is our current climate. The need to apply one of only two labels to any story means these contradictions will be ever present. A day after the press was telling us to stop being crude they excuse Samantha Bee. While the entertainment industry demands women be treated better they applaud treating a woman in this fashion. The party that claims to support women, and claims conservative wage a war-on-women, now praises degrading a woman and mother in this fashion.

The interesting thing about virtue-signaling — it is so frequently done in the absence of actual virtues. Just look at how willing, and how quickly, Hollywood springs up to support words that contradict their most earnest messaging going on since last October. As long as their target is someone they deem evil then their entire agenda is easily dismissed. Do they get to smear the people on the other side? Then the contradiction is completely justified.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: Rummyfan
I remember in high school our friends parents used to get a few drinks in them, catch some naughty banter, mention Linda Lovelace, and that was enough to get straight to business with no Viagra.

Fast forward 40 years and we have a flying nun shrieking the "$unt" word to get a rise out of the bunch.

Scary what is next?

21 posted on 06/02/2018 2:37:19 PM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tje

R level.......relevant


22 posted on 06/02/2018 2:37:26 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda�Divide and conquer seems to be working.?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

“Consider for a moment...”

You’re a real general Brad.


23 posted on 06/02/2018 2:41:38 PM PDT by coaster123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

No argument. Shakespeare’s line is vulgar, but funny. Bee’s line is vulgar, ugly and insulting to the point of being ‘fighting words’. Had she said it in front of Ivanka, I would blame Ivanka if she decked her..


24 posted on 06/02/2018 2:43:49 PM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: hanamizu

"If U Seek Amy"


25 posted on 06/02/2018 2:47:33 PM PDT by Bratch ("The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: euram

Exactly! And I remember Sandra Bernhard..she is a lesbian “Actress” who said in 2008 that if Sarah Palin ever came to New York City she would get her “Black Homies” to “Gang rape her” so basically Bernhard is implying that black men are all a bunch of rapists...and not a peep from anyone about it..and where is Bernhard now..you guessed it, she is a cast member on Roseanne..didnt hear Sara Gilbert demand that she quit the show for that obvious racist statement..leftists can say whatever they want and do whatever they want without consequence because they have the Commies in the media and in the entertainment industry always defend them


26 posted on 06/02/2018 3:18:25 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: barbarianbabs

Which is why Harvey Weinstein was able to roam around and do whatever he wanted for so long without a peep from anyone..he donated money to the “Right” political party, therefore he was exempt from any consequence


27 posted on 06/02/2018 3:19:18 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

As bad as the feckless C statement, I believe even worse what she insinuated afterward, when she said for Ivanka to put on something “tight and low cut” to ask he dad to do something. Isn’t she insinuating sexual relationship between father and daughter?
To me that is worse, but I hear no comments about that comment. What say you?


28 posted on 06/02/2018 3:36:08 PM PDT by Ferndina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
Hollywood:

C's for Bee!

29 posted on 06/02/2018 3:44:00 PM PDT by null and void (Have the courage to shine the light of reason in a dark world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Toxic femininity

Toxic Shock Feminist.

Nothing feminine about it.

30 posted on 06/02/2018 3:45:37 PM PDT by null and void (Have the courage to shine the light of reason in a dark world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So what are we? Chopped liver?


31 posted on 06/02/2018 3:46:52 PM PDT by null and void (Have the courage to shine the light of reason in a dark world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Sally Field has been nuts for decades. That is why they cast her in the movie ‘Lincoln’ as Mary Todd Lincoln in the early months of 1865. She didn’t have to act to play the part of a woman who was crazy to begin with.


32 posted on 06/02/2018 3:48:08 PM PDT by wmileo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Who cares what this cretin says or thinks?

Anybody that wastes their life watching whatever it is she does should definitely be gassed, won’t miss them a bit, will raise the aggregate IQ.

Time to make America smart again.


33 posted on 06/02/2018 3:50:06 PM PDT by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA-SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS-CLOSE ALL MOSQUES-GOD WITH US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

She ain’t no nun.


34 posted on 06/02/2018 3:58:07 PM PDT by barbarianbabs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Trash supports trash. Nothing new here.


35 posted on 06/02/2018 4:04:19 PM PDT by mulligan (EeThe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: euram

Trump basically has control of only one entity, the USMC.

Until he unleashes them on the domestic enemies in DC, he will never be effective.

It really is time to start talking Provisional military government.

Trump as Dictator, Congress disbanded and replaced by REAL AMERICANS, the SCOTUS decimated or packed with REAL AMERICANS.

The enemedia stomped down Putin style.

The WASHINGTONIANS have not even been slowed down by Trump to date, and they will NEVER be defeated by playing by the rules.

The communist muslim ex CIA director threatening Trump and he doesn’t have him executed?

The DOJ surrendered to the WASHINGTONIANS by some TREACHEROUS doddering old fool?

So far Trump has succeeded in cutting the oligarchy’s taxes in half and raising taxes on the Middle class.

This does not look like it’s going to end well.

TIME IS RUNNING OUT!!!


36 posted on 06/02/2018 4:04:49 PM PDT by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA-SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS-CLOSE ALL MOSQUES-GOD WITH US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Feminists murder the unborn and hate women if they do not fully support the mental disease of Liberalism.


37 posted on 06/02/2018 4:46:55 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

NOT just
Hollywood women ....ALL women do!


38 posted on 06/02/2018 4:54:48 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (I love Bull Markets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

R =The level she thinks she is.


39 posted on 06/02/2018 4:58:08 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda�Divide and conquer seems to be working.?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kid Shelleen

The left has no morals.


40 posted on 06/02/2018 5:11:16 PM PDT by Mozilla (Truth Is Stranger than Fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson