Posted on 04/23/2018 4:55:28 AM PDT by EyesOfTX
So, heres how our fake national news media justifies what it does:
- Devin Nunes, Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told Fox News host Maria Bartiromo on Sunday that the Obama Administrations fake counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign was started in early 2016 with no official intelligence as its basis.
- Other than Fox and a handful of conservative news outlets, no media outlet has reported this incredible, bombshell news, which means that the investigation was illegal from the outset.
- The fake news media outlets refusing to cover this story claim that its all Nunes fault, because he has destroyed his own credibility with the fake news media.
- Why is that the case? Because Nunes has spent the last 13 months uncovering the truth about the Trump/Russia Collusion fantasy play that has been mounted by the Democrat party in direct coordination with those same fake news media players.
- Because of that, the fake news media identified Nunes as a threat, and has mounted an intense character assassination campaign against him.
See how that works? The media identifies a threat to their narrative, colludes with Democrats like bug-eyed Adam Schiff, the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, to demonize that threat, claims that threat has lost his credibility as a result of the demonization campaign, and then proceeds to ignore everything he says on the grounds of the lost credibility. A textbook display of a Saul Alinsky character assassination campaign.
In all seriousness, the revelation by Nunes is incredible in its potential ramifications, and it cant just be wished away no matter how hard the fake media tries. The FBI and intelligence community currently claim that the origin for its counterintelligence operation against the Trump Campaign was a conversation that a pathetic minor hander-on named George Papadopolous had with an Australian diplomat. If that is true which is highly suspect then that bit of intelligence should have been communicated through the so-called Five Eyes agreement between the U.S., Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the UK, a deal that ensures these five allies do not spy on one anothers citizens without everyone knowing about it.
Nunes, as Chairman of the House Intel Committee, is privy to such Five Eyes communications, so is obviously in a position to know. Obama CIA Director John Brennan testified to congress last May that he directly communicated the intelligence he had accumulated as of October 2016 to then-FBI Director James Comey, and also briefed key members of congress at the same time.
Unfortunately for Brennan, last week the FBI, after months of stonewalling, released the original electronic communications documents that led to the creation of its counterintelligence investigation, and those documents, according to Nunes, reveal that that intelligence that Brennan passed to Comey did not come through official channels. Nunes told Bartiromo the following:
Nunes doesnt know whether the former secretary of state and then-Democratic challenger to Trump in the election, Hillary Clinton, was pulling the strings of the investigation launched against her political opponent. However, he said it is known that two long-time Clinton associates including Sidney Blumenthal were actively giving information to the State Department, which was somehow making its way to the FBI.
So, what all this means is that it is very likely that the CIA, under Brennans leadership, had been conducting illegal surveillance on the Trump Campaign long before the FBI had ever obtained a FISA warrant authorizing such activity against U.S. citizens, and that associates of the Pantsuit Princess were feeding the State Department information from the fake Trump Dossier that the DNC and Clinton Campaign had spent millions of dollars having compiled. That information was then being fed by the State Department to Brennan, and Brennan was then passing it through to Comey. Breathtaking.
This explains why Nunes and his committee are still working on a report on its findings related to the State Departments involvement in the illegal spying on the Trump Campaign. We also should remember here that we have evidence, in the form of texts between disgraced deep state FBI Agent Peter Strzok and his mistress, DOJ lawyer Lisa Page, that President Obama himself was aware of all of this as early as September 2016. In that month, Strzok texted Page that Obama had requested a briefing on everything we are doing.
This is the single biggest scandal in American history, and our fake news media is so blinded by its collective hatred for Donald Trump and its overwhelming general political bias that it is not just missing the story, it is intentionally ignoring it in the hopes that pretending that the facts dont exist will somehow make them go away.
But facts are stubborn things, as Ronald Reagan famously said, and you cant just wish them away.
Just another day in the truth is coming slowly but surely America.
That is all.
Follow me on Twitter at @GDBlackmon
4DChess has become code for accepting fairytale theories over actual facts. For example, every time Trump expresses genuine frustration with Sessions, the Sessions cheerleaders, like a row of mindless parrots, chorus, ‘4DChess!’. It means Trump is actually thrilled and delighted with Sessions, but that Jeff is such a deadly threat to the swamp, he needs cover so as to complete the massive takedown he is engineering ‘behind the scenes.’
“...what data would they come up with...?”
Good catch! I figured it out because they are all criminals - it’s like the one time the teenager gets caught drinking (or smoking or whatever misdeed) and the teen then attempts to try to pull it off as if the one time they were caught was their one and only first time -
In these situations it is almost certainly is not the first time the deed was done.
I first noticed Accuracy In Media when Ted Koppel would have "town hall" panel shows on Nightline and he would let Reed Irvine ask a question from the audience. You could see the condescension dripping from Koppel as he acknowledged Reed each time he was on the show.
Irvine and AIM were frequently dismissed as "conspiracy theorists," but as we see today, liberals label everything they don't wish to cover as "conspiracies."
-PJ
In much the same way the Soviets branded people who dissented as mentally ill.
Ah, the Left. Times change, costumes change, but their nature and tactics never do.
I suppose it is a good thing for us that they cannot, for the life of them, ever come up with an original thought. From chants at protests like “Hey, Hey, Ho, Ho” or tactics against their opponents, they have to rely on the past for guidance!
BTTT
Zach is a known individual. As is Pieczenik. As are other Trump orbit sources such as Jones, Stone, and Corsi.
All info should be taken with a grain of salt and verified as possible elsewhere. But Infowars actually has a far better record than the usual.
in other words:
Trump derangement syndrome + Anti-America leftard agenda & bias + emotionalism & feeling bad inside + wishful thinking is reality + evasion = leftard mentality
If Trump had picked a better AG, who should it have been, and what do you think would/should have have happened by now?
If it was Christie, or Giuliani, or whoever, would/should there have been no Russia witch hunt investigation at all? How exactly would this better AG have silenced the impeach Trump crowd in congress and the press who were screaming for an investigation 24/7?
Would it be by firing Rosenstien and others in the DOJ? How would this AG have kept the MSM from spinning a slew of firings into Trump’s “Saturday Night Massacre”?
By now, would there be a bunch of top dogs from past administrations in jail (or headed there) with a stronger AG?
This isn’t rhetorical - I’m asking serious questions.
My belief is that the Sessions bashers are suffering from high expectations if they think any Clintons, Podestas, Lynches, Holders, Rices etc. would have been wearing orange jumpsuits by now, had we had a stronger AG who had nor recused anything, had “cleaned house” and had done his job.
Without a time machine and a do-over, we’ll never know.
Personally, I think if we had a different AG, the only difference would be that a different AG would be getting constantly bashed on FR.
That’s a very good analysis
They can’t stop with the lies
Fortunately for them they have the media
Except fox and talk radio
If Ryan and McConnell were not intricately involved in this Attempted Coup and Treasonous Acts, BOTH of them would be Holding Public Trials for TREASON for the players known already.
The press and the Democrats are constantly hysterical about Trump. The idea that the only way to respond to their lying and screaming is by appeasement is insane. Europe tried the appeasement route pre-WWII; how’d that work out?
Appeasing the Left/evil only feeds their bloodlust. Appeasing them with Sessions’ recusal and a dirty, relentless coup attempt by Hillary-fixer Mueller was beyond insane. It has subsumed what should have been the best, strongest part of Trump’s presidency and created an insatiable Leftist lust for Trump’s head on a platter. It was a monumental show of weakness and the Left, like all thugs, respond to weakness by demanding blood.
A strong AG could have begun the investigation by examining the illegal FISA warrants. The best defense is an offense. There were many outright lies told in order to secure the illegal surveillance. Start by exposing those lies. Move on to other Leftist malfeasance. (It’s a target rich environment.) Be aggressive. Keep them on defense. Strength is the only response that evil understands.
I agree. Just because you have to take them with a grain of salt doesn’t mean you should throw them in the trash dismissively like a lot of people do.
Good point.
Actually it was Hillary’s analysis of a Trump win. She is so layered in viscious criminal conduct that she above all knows. She is just so unlikable that she must threaten her accusers of her own conduct, making it so unpalatable to go after her that she is immune from prosecution.
respond = responds
‘She is just so unlikable’
A Hillary quote that doesn’t get nearly enough air-play:
“I Am Getting Pretty Tired of Hearing About How Nobody Likes Me.”
When you have a family foundation that pays out less than 10% to actual charity work, people really don’t like you. They will hang around you for crumbs and a$$ ki $$ing with a hand out, but they really don’t much care for you.
Absolutely. Plus, pretty much everyone who matters knows that Vince Foster was murdered. Roughly the same number know he was far from alone. Talk about a carrot and a stick: money and influence on one side, death on the other.
In Boston the corrupt midget, Billy Bulger, had a sociopathic killer, mob henchman, FBI protected brother, Whitey. As the erstwhile mayor of Boston explained Billy’s outsize political power and influence:
“If my brother threatened to kill you, you’d be nothing but nice to me.”
And Hillary was kinda cute and perky when they whacked Vince Foster. The public could never come to terms with that. Now she could bite the heads off little Hatian babies just for the fresh blood. The public almost expects it from her. The masses are conditioned. Her supporters like the idea of biting the heads off little babies and fight for the right to do it.
Jerry Zeifman on why he fired Hillary Clinton from the House Watergate committee and would not and could not give her a letter of recommendation:
She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer, Zeifman said.No matter where you go, Hillary, there you are.
She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.
Which is why Hillary Clinton should NEVER be given power of any kind! Ever!!
THANK YOU, President Donald J. Trump and every single Trump voter and supporter who voted to save us/US from the pantsuit princess of darkness!
Thank you ALL!!!
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.