Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Power to Upgrade Our Own Biology Is in Sight—But Is Society Ready for Human Enhancement?
SingularityHub ^ | 2/15/18 | Raya Bidshahri

Posted on 02/21/2018 7:37:41 AM PST by Roman_War_Criminal

Upgrading our biology may sound like science fiction, but attempts to improve humanity actually date back thousands of years. Every day, we enhance ourselves through seemingly mundane activities such as exercising, meditating, or consuming performance-enhancing drugs, such as caffeine or adderall. However, the tools with which we upgrade our biology are improving at an accelerating rate and becoming increasingly invasive.

In recent decades, we have developed a wide array of powerful methods, such as genetic engineering and brain-machine interfaces, that are redefining our humanity. In the short run, such enhancement technologies have medical applications and may be used to treat many diseases and disabilities. Additionally, in the coming decades, they could allow us to boost our physical abilities or even digitize human consciousness.

What’s New? Many futurists argue that our devices, such as our smartphones, are already an extension of our cortex and in many ways an abstract form of enhancement. According to philosophers Andy Clark and David Chalmers’ theory of extended mind, we use technology to expand the boundaries of the human mind beyond our skulls.

One can argue that having access to a smartphone enhances one’s cognitive capacities and abilities and is an indirect form of enhancement of its own. It can be considered an abstract form of brain-machine interface. Beyond that, wearable devices and computers are already accessible in the market, and people like athletes use them to boost their progress.

However, these interfaces are becoming less abstract.

Not long ago, Elon Musk announced a new company, Neuralink, with the goal of merging the human mind with AI. The past few years have seen remarkable developments in both the hardware and software of brain-machine interfaces. Experts are designing more intricate electrodes while programming better algorithms to interpret neural signals. Scientists have already succeeded in enabling paralyzed patients to type with their minds, and are even allowing brains to communicate with one another purely through brainwaves.

Ethical Challenges of Enhancement There are many social and ethical implications of such advancements.

One of the most fundamental issues with cognitive and physical enhancement techniques is that they contradict the very definition of merit and success that society has relied on for millennia. Many forms of performance-enhancing drugs have been considered “cheating” for the longest time.

But perhaps we ought to revisit some of our fundamental assumptions as a society.

For example, we like to credit hard work and talent in a fair manner, where “fair” generally implies that an individual has acted in a way that has served him to merit his rewards. If you are talented and successful, it is considered to be because you chose to work hard and take advantage of the opportunities available to you. But by these standards, how much of our accomplishments can we truly be credited for?

For instance, the genetic lottery can have an enormous impact on an individual’s predisposition and personality, which can in turn affect factors such as motivation, reasoning skills, and other mental abilities. Many people are born with a natural ability or a physique that gives them an advantage in a particular area or predisposes them to learn faster. But is it justified to reward someone for excellence if their genes had a pivotal role in their path to success?

Beyond that, there are already many ways in which we take “shortcuts” to better mental performance. Seemingly mundane activities like drinking coffee, meditating, exercising, or sleeping well can boost one’s performance in any given area and are tolerated by society. Even the use of language can have positive physical and psychological effects on the human brain, which can be liberating to the individual and immensely beneficial to society at large. And let’s not forget the fact that some of us are born into more access to developing literacy than others.

Given all these reasons, one could argue that cognitive abilities and talents are currently derived more from uncontrollable factors and luck than we like to admit. If anything, technologies like brain-machine interfaces can enhance individual autonomy and allow one a choice of how capable they become.

As Karim Jebari points out (pdf), if a certain characteristic or trait is required to perform a particular role and an individual lacks this trait, would it be wrong to implement the trait through brain-machine interfaces or genetic engineering? How is this different from any conventional form of learning or acquiring a skill? If anything, this would be removing limitations on individuals that result from factors outside their control, such as biological predisposition (or even traits induced from traumatic experiences) to act or perform in a certain way.

Another major ethical concern is equality. As with any other emerging technology, there are valid concerns that cognitive enhancement tech will benefit only the wealthy, thus exacerbating current inequalities. This is where public policy and regulations can play a pivotal role in the impact of technology on society.

Enhancement technologies can either contribute to inequality or allow us to solve it. Educating and empowering the under-privileged can happen at a much more rapid rate, helping the overall rate of human progress accelerate. The “normal range” for human capacity and intelligence, however it is defined, could shift dramatically towards more positive trends.

Many have also raised concerns over the negative applications of government-led biological enhancement, including eugenics-like movements and super-soldiers. Naturally, there are also issues of safety, security, and well-being, especially within the early stages of experimentation with enhancement techniques.

Brain-machine interfaces, for instance, could have implications on autonomy. The interface involves using information extracted from the brain to stimulate or modify systems in order to accomplish a goal. This part of the process can be enhanced by implementing an artificial intelligence system onto the interface—one that exposes the possibility of a third party potentially manipulating individual’s personalities, emotions, and desires by manipulating the interface.

A Tool For Transcendence It’s important to discuss these risks, not so that we begin to fear and avoid such technologies, but so that we continue to advance in a way that minimizes harm and allows us to optimize the benefits.

Stephen Hawking notes that “with genetic engineering, we will be able to increase the complexity of our DNA, and improve the human race.” Indeed, the potential advantages of modifying biology are revolutionary. Doctors would gain access to a powerful tool to tackle disease, allowing us to live longer and healthier lives. We might be able to extend our lifespan and tackle aging, perhaps a critical step to becoming a space-faring species. We may begin to modify the brain’s building blocks to become more intelligent and capable of solving grand challenges.

In their book Evolving Ourselves, Juan Enriquez and Steve Gullans describe a world where evolution is no longer driven by natural processes. Instead, it is driven by human choices, through what they call unnatural selection and non-random mutation. Human enhancement is bringing us closer to such a world—it could allow us to take control of our evolution and truly shape the future of our species.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Health/Medicine; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: ai; singularity; transhumanism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Huskrrrr

For stroke victims to get their lives back would be a major blessing from God.


21 posted on 02/21/2018 8:54:27 AM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Roman_War_Criminal

Here comes “Brave New World”!


22 posted on 02/21/2018 8:56:03 AM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Awesome!

I wonder if that will create any undue stress on the spine, requiring a modification to the general framework...


23 posted on 02/21/2018 8:56:40 AM PST by robroys woman (So you're not confused, I'm male.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Roman_War_Criminal
One name:
Khan Noonien Singh
24 posted on 02/21/2018 8:58:02 AM PST by Kartographer ("We mutually pledge to each other opleoour lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roman_War_Criminal

“One of the most fundamental issues with cognitive and physical enhancement techniques is that they contradict the very definition of merit and success that society has relied on for millennia.”

This will be wildly popular with all the leftists and equalitarians, who despise nature for making everyone different.

Finally their wet dream of “everybody is equal” can be realized.


25 posted on 02/21/2018 9:02:32 AM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robroys woman

You’ll just need to keep good posture, like those African women who carry baskets on their heads.


26 posted on 02/21/2018 10:08:22 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Roman_War_Criminal

well, Bob Dole sells enhancement pills...


27 posted on 02/21/2018 2:50:45 PM PST by faithhopecharity ("Politicans aren't born, they're excreted." -Marcus Tillius Cicero (3 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roman_War_Criminal

Ever since geneticist Dr. John Sanford (inventor of the gene gun) published his ground breaking work, Genetic Entropy, the future of humanity seemed bleak. This was due to the unavoidable accumulation of sub-lethal random mutations throughout our genome until we were no longer viable as a species. With the creation of technology to edit single base pairs, there is now hope that the eventual extinction of humanity due to genetic entropy can be avoided.

Useing statistical methods on people now living, we can identify where the mutations (there are about 100k identified genetic diseases) are and edit them out.

We might wind up with a super baby with a antedeluvian lifespan of hundreds of years.


28 posted on 02/21/2018 5:31:09 PM PST by UnChained (Revelation 13:7 (Gun control is an absolute prerequisite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roman_War_Criminal

I don’t think these scientists know what the f#ck they’re doing.


29 posted on 02/22/2018 9:30:57 AM PST by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson