Posted on 12/29/2017 7:50:24 AM PST by Basket_of_Deplorables
1) Ive been asked to do a thread about the FBI, Flynn, and other current events, so lets gets started. Where to begin? there is a heck of a lot to cover. So, lets begin at the beginning.
2.) twitter must really not want what I have to say getting out. Ok, from the beginning.
3. No one expected PDJT to win. The media, left, pollsters all counted him out. Fast forward to when Hillary's email case broke. They realized they might have a problem but thought they had it well in hand.
4. Let's take at that. Why was Hillary so confident she had nothing to worry about? She knew the fix was in. She knew she was going to get off Scott free.
5. Who investigates classified material breaches? The FBI. Let's take a close look at the FBI. We know at the time James Comey was head of the FBI. James Comey lied to congress, forged documents, and cleared HRC before she was interviewed.
Comey drafted his statement ending the Clinton email investigation months in advance, the FBI confirms Transcripts the Senate Judiciary Committee obtained had previously indicated that Comey drafted the statement. http://www.newsweek.com/james-comey-fbi-clinton-emails-drafted-statement-686140
6. Comey, obama and lynch corrupted the entire FBI leadership w HRC protectors. His deputy, McCabe is under investigation right with him. I'm talking criminal charges.
7. McCabe has serious issues. We know he failed to recuse from the HRC email case he had an oversight role in. This was at a time he had taken a huge sum of money from HRC & her insider Terry McCauliffe.
Top Clinton Bundlers Were Major Donors to Wife of FBI's Andrew McCabe
Bundlers for Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign joined Clinton ally and Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe in donating to Jill McCabe.
.........
(Excerpt) Read more at threadreaderapp.com ...
Good thinking. I think it had to do with putting the Huma/Weiner laptop rumors down too, more than just the e-mails alone. That was the reason he gave, since there were rumors out there raging at the time about Hillary and child porn together on that laptop, that they were trying to disprove.
Exactly. It was probably based on a bar bet. One guy, two and a half martinis in, bet the other guy he couldn’t go on 4chan and create an ‘insider source,’ that would make followers believe ridiculous things. The second guy responded, ‘You’re on!’
So far the second guy is winning.
I love a good conspiracy theory, but the whole point is to find put if it is actually true, is it not? Not just run around waving your arms saying “Hey, look what *I* found!” As if another unproven conspiracy is worth anything without actual research.
You’re 100% right. But the people who come up with the kookiest conspiracies DO believe they’re getting at the truth. You would, for example, be amazed at how many people believe Michelle Obama is a man and did not give birth to the two daughters. Now me, I have seen un-shopped photos of Michelle that leave me utterly baffled when it comes to the anatomy in question. But I believe Michelle is a woman and birthed the girls. They look just like Michelle and Obama, and that cannot be put down to coincidence.
There are even stranger theories around. The purveyors absolutely believe them. What can you do?
Smh.
At least there’s some actual photos of Michelle’s midline which do raise some questions. But as far as the crackpot theory that Michael Flynn is completely relased from all his DoD NDA’s covering classified material, and wanted to be charged with a felony just so that could happen, there’s no evidence of that, at all.
Top Secret or unique Special Access Program info like that can ONLY be legally shared with others who have the same clearance level, whether he’s charged with murder or what have you. Now they may want to read a jury into those programs, but typically that would only be a military tribunal, not some D.C. Federal Court full of ordinary citizens. And then, if the jury was read into the programs, he could speak freely about them without having to be charged. The whole thing is an obvious lie that the believers are just glazing right over.
Click the link for the page of unrolled threads by @nameredacted. I promise you, it is well worth it!I agree with publius911: It's "Too obtuse and confusing"
But then I stuck with it, and finally realized that an "unrolled" thread is ALL the posts combined of one particular Twitter thread/topic, posted by one person, available for reading in one place, without having to wade through any of the paid-DNC-disrupter comments.
It's a shame that Twitter keeps zotting the accounts of the "good guys" trying to inform us of whats really going on.
I also haven't found that GAB is a useful alternative (yet?) to twitter. It seems like GAB just links to twitter posts so that when twitter zots someone, then the posts are no longer available even at GAB. (or is that a wrong assumption?)
Please feel free to ping me if there are any more @nameredacted chains posted in the future. I've read all five of the ones that seem to be out there at the moment by nameredacted5.
Thanks for the heads up that you believe these are from a legititmate "good guy" insider.
President Trump is drawing attention to the mysterious federal court case against Imran Awan, the former IT aide to a number of congressional Democrats, including former Democratic National Committee chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
“Whatever happened to this Pakistani guy who worked with the DNC?” the president asked in an interview published Thursday by the New York Times.
- - - - - -
Fox News thinks the President is “drawing attention” to this. What do you think?
The Awan case has been dropped from the docket. Trump is right to call this to people’s attention. Under Sessions, no Democrats are under investigation but Trump has a pack of Hillary-loyalist hyenas breathing down his neck. Sessions is a catastrophy.
You laid that out very well. Amazing to see the ‘Michelle is a man,’ theory backed by more evidence than the Flynn theory. Strange days indeed.
Geroge Webb just said it was dropped from the Calendar, but not the Docket. https://youtu.be/nvY3KnlSE4g
Not going to listen to the video. What’s the rationale for dropping the case from the calendar?
George talks about it in the first 30 seconds of the video. Listen for yourself.
While you’re at it, ask me who I think knows more about the Awan case, POTUS or Webb.
[Hint: I didn’t buy the Braverman conspiracy either. There was no evidence to back it. The fact that people who are not his friends, family or associates haven’t seen him is a hoax. These are people who wouldn’t normally see him. There’s no grand conspiracy to be had when people who virtually never see a person, do not see that person.]
If you can’t or won’t encapsulate a 30 second explanation, it must be quite elusive.
Yup, you want to be spoon fed, so you are still a Liberal. Sorry, sometimes the seeds fall among the briars.
Please. You tried this same routine with me once before. You couldn’t answer a simple question, so you wanted me to read hundreds of pp. The subject was one I had specifically studied in college. As a result, I already knew the information you claimed was in the 100s of pp wasn’t there. It’s just a gimmick you use to evade answering simple, basic questions. At least then all you (falsely) accused me of was laziness. Now you’re lying about my conservatism. Ought Christians to lie publicly like this?
First thirty seconds of the video. You have wasted more time moaning about it than it would have taken you to watch.
There is a reason I’m not going to listen, but the reason is none of your business.
Interesting comment: Oath Keepers Stand By
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.