Can someone please ask this brain-dead buffalo how her narrative even makes any sense in light of her timeline with the DNC?
Seth Rich was murdered on July 10th of 2016.
Donna Brazile didn't take over as the acting head of the DNC until July 28th.
Is she suggesting that she was running the DNC while she was also working as a contributor to CNN?
She did give Hillary the questions in advance, so yes
I believe Brazile was on some DNC Board even while being paid by CNN. "Not that there's anything wrong with that" . . .
Yes. She was an “objective” member of the media (CNN) while simultaneously serving in a leadership role for the DNC. She cheated for Hillary while double-dipping.
She was vice chair while Debbie Wasserman-Schultz was chair. That was the period when Seth Rich was killed (and Donna gave Hillary the debate question). Then, after Rich was killed, and Debbie resigned, Donna stepped up to be full chair.
Donna did not resign from CNN because she became chair of the DNC. She resigned from CNN because her cheating for Hillary became public knowledge. At that point, it was decided that maybe she should not be considered an “objective” media person and should just rig elections for Hillary full-time.
Such a dirty system.
Thanks for pointing that out.
The answer to the question is yes, she was working for both, not that there is any separation between the two.
Does one have to be the head of an organization to help keep someone 'there' working on a particular strategy ?
Great catch and question. That same sentence had jumped out at me for another reason. What does she mean by “helped keep him there”? Who was trying to get rid of him? Whether she did anything, or just remembers something, Rich must have been in the middle of a situation that required “help”. Why, who, what, when, etc. ought to be on the lips of investigators and even journalists.