Posted on 10/04/2017 7:45:10 AM PDT by gaggs
If you look at the website flightaware.com and search a tail number, in this case N5343M, you will see the N number belongs to a SR20 that at one time was registered to Stephen C. Paddock of Mesquite, Texas and Henderson, Nevada (Our Shooter). You will also see that it is currently registered to a company out of Roanoke, Virginia named VOLANT LLC. A company that works with the “Defense/Intelligence” community per their website. Wait it gets better.
(Excerpt) Read more at commonsenseevaluation.com ...
Drudge headline calls him radiclized.
Yes. I can’t believe he of all people! A true partisan who covered up for Hillary and has financial ties to her campaign!!
McCabe got it.
FAA website associates that tail number with a Cessna 152.
FlightAware associates that tail number with a Cirrus SR20.
Not the same aircraft at all.
FlightAware data run from Jun 2006 to the present
FAA data contain no date.
WTF?
My reading of the FAA data seems to show the Cessna was deregistered in 2001.
The Flightaware info is more recent. Does the FAA commonly re-issue tail numbers?
The Volant LLC seems be a similar name, but is it the same outfit as the defense contractor?
Details need more details.
Suppose he is an arms trader (guns for drugs, to cartels).
That would explain the large sums of money and his airplanes. And his almost invisible public profile.
Suppose he sometimes meets his customers in Las Vegas hotels. (And if you want to launder large sums of cash, Vegas is the place to do it.)
Suppose the government pressured him into cooperating (against cartels, radical groups, etc); and whoever were his customers this time
turned the sting around?
“Suppose the government pressured him into cooperating (against cartels, radical groups, etc); and whoever were his customers this time
turned the sting around?”
That would also explain the demand that the LV police not enter the room, but wait for the SWAT team — who would clean up any evidence that they had been “stung”?
The Klintoon Foundation paid for shill
is in charge of the investigation
of possible 'Deep State' involvement
Rite !
Just as objective as Comey, writing the decision before the investigation...
Rite !
This is more than interesting.
Should be posted in breaking news.
Everyone should send drudge and other outlets a link.
I did the search on the database, and the article checks out.
I read yesterday a theory that Stephen worked for the FBI and was working on a “fast and furious” type project. Would make sense since he had so many guns in his room.
What lone wolf would need 20-40 guns for a mass shooting? Boxes of ammo, yes. Guns...no.
Add in the police scanner recording.. It does not come close to matching the official narrative. Even if it was one guy, based on the police scanner, they should not jump to that conclusion so quickly.
Lastly, the interview with his brother: Very weird. When asked if he was retired, he gave a weird answer and kept referring everyone to “look at the public record...I don’t want to to give you that info...it is public record...go look it up...he said that like a dozen times...which was weird”.
Obviously this thing stinks to high heaven. The plane’s registered search shows a good point of direction for investigation.
I’m still banking on the Terrorist angle. I bet ISIS is correct. They converted this guy and funded him for this job.
And the woman knows it.
The hallway is probably video taped.
GAGGS- more searches please
Try Duck Duck Go “VOLANT LLC, AIRPLANE, VIRGINIA”
And then in 2013 it was registered by a spook shop in Virginia, and the FAA database isn't consistent with the flightware.com data.
Pretty strange stuff.
If he was a spook. Why did he sacrifice himself. What was his end goal?
Where’s Brennan?
There was a thread last night, I think from Reddit or 4chan, about Paddock running guns for domestic ISIS groups as a sting operation. I was going to read it in more detail later, but it looks like the thread got pulled. I cannot find it anywhere on FR.
Yes. It's not unheard of for aircraft companies to try having all their tail numbers match some pattern, and to periodically troll the FAA database for recently deregistered numbers that match their pattern.
Here’s the whole thing:
If you look at the website flightaware.com and search a tail number, in this case N5343M, you will see the N number belongs to a SR20 that at one time was registered to Stephen C. Paddock of Mesquite, Texas and Henderson, Nevada (Our Shooter). You will also see that it is currently registered to a company out of Roanoke, Virginia named VOLANT LLC. A company that works with the “Defense/Intelligence” community per their website. Wait it gets better. The registration is listed as active. Don’t worry that it shows the last flight for the Aircraft three years ago. They only show the flight when a flight plan is filed.
.
Flightware pulls their data directly from the FAA registration database, so it should be accurate correct? Now the interesting part. If you go to faa.gov and put the same tail number into their search engine (N5343M), you will find that the FAA says that the N number is inactive. The last registration was to a Cessna 152 (a different aircraft) to some guy in San Diego, California. There is no mention of the current registration by VOLANT LLC or Stephen Paddock.
The FAA database is updated everyday business at midnight. So, it looks like someone either scrubbed the FAA database and forgot or didn’t know that Flightware posted the same info. Maybe someone at Flightware is playing a big trick on everyone and putting false info in their database.
All I know is that the name of Stephen C. Paddock now has something in common with a Spook Outfit. Very interesting!
Paddock’s life keeps connecting back to the government/defense contractors (postal worker, IRS, DOD, OPM, Lockheed). Was this guy a CIA spook?
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.