Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: umgud
Bit of a risky case. Only two for sure conservatives with Gorsuch as an unknown on this issue but most likely will favor overturning the ban.

Roberts is up for grabs.

I think we already know how Kennedy will vote.

Best case is 4-5.

12 posted on 07/24/2017 11:31:12 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: ealgeone

Yes, it is. The SC recently rejected hearing a similar case from California.


18 posted on 07/24/2017 5:26:27 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: ealgeone; umgud; faithhopecharity; All

>
Bit of a risky case. Only two for sure conservatives with Gorsuch as an unknown on this issue but most likely will favor overturning the ban.
>

IMO, not so much. It’s when the damn lawyers create libraries of lawyer-speak do the courts gain the ability to parse ‘IS’ instead of the subject at hand.

The filing should be short and sweet: any\all ‘gun control’ laws are null/void vs. ‘shall not be infringed’.

NOTHING need be brought up re: The People, grammatical contexts and sentence structure, ‘trench sweepers’ vs. WWI, etc.

Either the language stands on its own, or it is yet another example of our lost Republic.

Hence, why the case would NEVER be allowed to wind its way through the courts. It would be THE end-all on the lawsuits.


30 posted on 07/25/2017 5:32:51 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson