>
Bit of a risky case. Only two for sure conservatives with Gorsuch as an unknown on this issue but most likely will favor overturning the ban.
>
IMO, not so much. It’s when the damn lawyers create libraries of lawyer-speak do the courts gain the ability to parse ‘IS’ instead of the subject at hand.
The filing should be short and sweet: any\all ‘gun control’ laws are null/void vs. ‘shall not be infringed’.
NOTHING need be brought up re: The People, grammatical contexts and sentence structure, ‘trench sweepers’ vs. WWI, etc.
Either the language stands on its own, or it is yet another example of our lost Republic.
Hence, why the case would NEVER be allowed to wind its way through the courts. It would be THE end-all on the lawsuits.
Gov’t has multiple definitions for almost everything you can think of, except “infringement.”