Skip to comments.
Is Assad Guilty Of Using Chemical Weapons On His Own People? Maybe Not
Christian's Worldview ^
| 4-6-16
| Chuck Ness
Posted on 04/06/2017 12:20:38 PM PDT by OneVike
by Chuck Ness
I am of the belief that the chemical attacks on the citizens of n Syria are not being perpetrated by either President Assad, nor the Russians. A huge claim that I must back up with evidence or at least present enough to give credence to my belief.
Before I take on the situation as it stands between those directly involved in Syria's civil war, I'll state unequivocally that the biggest winner in this chemical attack is the leftist NWO supporters. If it can be proved that Assad and Putin are guilty, it leaves the door open for the NWO types to push for outside interference in Syria's war. Like Iraq, the neocons will again push for the United States to be the force that removes Assad from power and thus creating a situation that will keep Trump from accomplishing anything. While the left and their mouth piece, the MSM, will treat Trump as just another war mongering Republican President. If Trump refuses to get involved, then they will just attack him for being in bed with Putin.
So while the NWO will win if the lie carries the day, allow me to share my opinion as to who between Assad, the rebels, and ISIS benefits the most by using Chemical weapons. First we must admit that their is no upside to the rebels using chemical weapons on their own family and friends. They truly want a change in who rules their country. With the rebel fighters eliminated from benefiting, we now must concentrate on Assad and ISIS.
Since late 2016, it has been pretty evident that Al' Assad has been winning the Civil War in Syria. ISIS fighters are in marathon-like retreat across the eastern countryside of Aleppo and other areas of the country. This leaves the rebel fighters as the only opposition to Assad, and the territories held by them are falling like dominoes to Assad's superior Russian backed fighters.
At the rate of the fighting today, it's expected that the rebels in Aleppo will soon shoot the last bullet in their attempt to take down Assad. As for Damascus, Isaiah's prophecy is being fulfilled as I write this. Truth be told, there isn't much left of the ancient city but dirt to fight over anyway.
What with Obama's army, ISIS, on the run and the rebels making their last Alamo type stand in Aleppo and Damascus, it makes no logical sense for Assad to now begin using chemical warfare against his own people. All this act does is give the world a reason to convince Donald Trump to break his campaign promise of not getting into any more wars. Why would Assad allow a victory to be snatched from his hand by gassing his own people? Nope. It makes no sense.
Back in July of 2014, we learned that GW was right about Saddam having weapons of mass destruction, That is when hundreds of the MSM news outlets reported that ISIS grabbed 2,500 rockets containing chemical weapons from a compound in Iraq that Obama left for them to take after he pulled out all US forces. What do you think ISIS did with those rockets? Yea, me to.
The last major report by U.N. inspectors on the status of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program was released back in March 2003. It stated that Bunker 13 contained 2,500 sarin-filled 122-mm chemical rockets produced and filled before 1991, and about 180 tons of sodium cyanide, 'a very toxic chemical and a precursor for the warfare agent tabun.
We also know that a Month ago on March 3, 2017, that the Red Cross reported that civilians escaping the fighting in Mosul have been exposed to chemical agents. This isn't the first time ISIS has used chemicals of mass destruction on those who refuse to bow to their rule. It has been reported time and time again that whenever ISIS is pushed out of an area, they use chemical warfare on the civilians as they leave.
Then there are thee credible reports of 250 people from Majdal and Khattab that were kidnapped by Al-Qaeda terrorists working with ISIS last week. Local sources have claimed that many of those dead from the chemical weapons were those kidnapped from Majdal and Khattab. This would suggest that on the eve of upcoming peace negotiations, terrorist forces have once again created a false flag scenario. This bares resemblance to the Ghouta chemical weapons attack in 2013 where the Syrian Army was accused of using the weapons of mass destruction on the day that United Nations Weapons Inspectors arrived in Damascus.An attack that the UN later admitted was perpetrated by ISIS, not Assad.
Now we learn from tweets that, Orient TV had already prepared a media campaign to cover the Russian and Syrian airstrikes in Hama countryside that accused them of using chemical weapons on innocent civilians. However, the announcement of covering the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government came out before the attack ever happened/ OOPS!, Hours before the attack ever took place the accusations already began flooding twitter.
Everyone knows by now that the MO of ISIS is to use any means possible to kill anyone who opposes their rule. Killing innocent people in the most painful and evil way is the way they operate. All this to say that, of those involved in the fighting, ISIS benefits the most from using chemical weapons on innocent people. It's how they keep non combatants in fear of them which helps them gain control over their lives.
As for the tweets I mentioned, looks like someone forgot to tell him that it would not occur for a few more hours before he sent out the tweet. Here are two different individuals remarking on this. All this leaves in doubt the accusation that Assad gassed his own people. While proving ISIS is most likely the ones who perpetrated the attack.
Posted in full, but a complimentary click on my blog would be much appreciated.
Christian's Worldview
TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Miscellaneous; Politics
KEYWORDS: chemicalweapons; isis; syria; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
To: Pearls Before Swine
Erdogen believes he is the next Caliph and would love to expand his territory. Isn’t it Qatar that want to have a gas pipeline through Syria?
To: OneVike
We know Fake News is about all you get from the RATmedia. I won’t believe this story until there is proof from a reputable source.
22
posted on
04/06/2017 12:52:31 PM PDT
by
arrogantsob
(Check out "CHAOS AND MAYHEM" at Amazon.com.)
To: rdcbn
Thanks for this information.
To: McGruff
To: Rusty0604
And, wasn’t Erdogan one of Obama’s best buddies before Obama got all soft on Iran?
I heard that Erdogan was one of the first people Obama contacted after his election. Maybe that’s not the case, but I do remember hearing it.
Muslims of a feather try to connive together. Forgive the crime-rhyme.
To: OneVike
If that is the case, why is his SOS out there saying they are going to form a coalition to oust Assad?
To: OneVike
Listening to Savage just now and he asked the rhetorical question “who wants Assad and his air power gone? Who benefits the most?” Israel.....
To: Rusty0604
If that is the case, why is his SOS out there saying they are going to form a coalition to oust Assad?
OH, I believe Trump has been convinced that Syria is guilty, but who convinced him?
The same intelligence agency that has been busy trying to take him down.
28
posted on
04/06/2017 1:05:04 PM PDT
by
OneVike
(I'm just a humble Christian waiting to go home)
To: Pearls Before Swine
Erdogen has just about finished turning Turkey from a secular Muslim country into an Islamic State. And he is sending Islamists into Europe and building mosques there like nobody’s business. Obama joined him in the opening of an Islamic center in Maryland. He wants to build a mosque in Cuba. He was Obama’s friend, but not ours.
To: Rusty0604
Turkey is Europe’s Mexico.
30
posted on
04/06/2017 1:07:48 PM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: OneVike
Exactly. And Israel intelligence is saying the same thing, and I know they don’t like Assad, but I wonder if they think they would end up with a better neighbor?
Yes, I think Trump is getting bad intelligence.
To: OneVike
Didn’t Trump say that Bush had gotten bad intelligence on Iraq?
To: arrogantsob
We know Fake News is about all you get from the RATmedia. I wont believe this story until there is proof from a reputable source.
I am beginning to see corruption behind everything, because the only ones going down are those who are innocent of the charges, or those exposing the slime. While the guilty continue getting away with their crimes.
The slime in the swamp goes deep and it's rooted to the very fibers of the government.
33
posted on
04/06/2017 1:13:04 PM PDT
by
OneVike
(I'm just a humble Christian waiting to go home)
To: Rusty0604
Yes he did. During a couple of the debates. Now he is allowing the very same ones to lead him into war.
If he goes in, the revolution is over.
He needs to stop and take a pause to see the whole picture, because I am beginning to see a rerun if a very bad movie staring GW.
Led on by the very same intelligence agencies that have been corrupt since The Clinton’s were in control in the “90”s.
34
posted on
04/06/2017 1:17:53 PM PDT
by
OneVike
(I'm just a humble Christian waiting to go home)
To: OneVike
Real persuasive, this doesn’t jive with the Russian excuse that a warehouse was hit. Might try to get the lies to line up; I guess defending a killer of American in Iraq as Assad was is more important to people.
35
posted on
04/06/2017 1:21:08 PM PDT
by
BeadCounter
( The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness -)
To: OneVike
I agree with you. His policy of putting American interests first instead of building quagmires around the world was the first thing I liked about Trump. I pray he comes around.
To: OneVike
Our UN ambassador may have made a fool out of herself if this was a typical terrorist trick - hide among civilians and stashes of WMD to get blown up.
To: BeadCounter
I guess defending a killer of American in Iraq as Assad was is more important to people.
So you think we should take him out? OK, So Trump goes in like Bush and Obama and we take another leader out.
And leave who in charge? Didn't work real well for Iraq or Libya did it?
Some times the tyrant we know is better than the unknown. I have news for you brother, we can never control the states of the Middle East. Not until we can control Islam, and we have yet to be able to control Islam in the West, what makes you think we will control it over in the Middle East?
No, with the political winds changing every 4 to 8 years in America, we cannot muster up the continuous will to stay there and fight for as long as it will take to make it work. Satan is in control there because even the good guys worship him as their god.
38
posted on
04/06/2017 3:57:19 PM PDT
by
OneVike
(I'm just a humble Christian waiting to go home)
To: McGruff
Primarily about oil pipelines into Europe which will undercut Russia. Also Russia desires a port that has direct access to the Mediterranean. Iran plays into the mix with Russia and that worries Israel. Potential powder keg of epic proportions if you do not tread lightly.
39
posted on
04/06/2017 4:05:13 PM PDT
by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
To: HLPhat
40
posted on
04/06/2017 4:15:52 PM PDT
by
OneVike
(I'm just a humble Christian waiting to go home)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson