[rockrr]

If I had been in Trumps shoes instead of resorting to twits, I would have immediately issued another EO and dared them to stop him.

[Coffee... Black... No Sugar]

The American President is the most powerful person in the world...

As long as the activist judiciary will allow it ...

[Carry me back]

True. There has to be an end game. The judges have no standing here.

[rightwingcrazy]

There may be enough traitors in Congress that would succumb to the resulting Outrage Machine and create a crisis.

[Lopeover]

The judges are guilty of judicial overreach and violated the US Constitution, for which they took an oath. Congress can impeach them.

Judicial partisanship won’t stop unless we make Congress stop them.

[Java4Jay]

Its a coup

[Java4Jay]

Written law vs. an opinion piece

[euram]

this obvious political ruling by the 9th Circus just exposes how political and dishonest the so-called judges have become. They think that they are the ultimate power, and not just the 3rd branch. It is long past time to drain the judicial swamp. I’ve read that Trump has as many as 100 federal judges to appoint, and he should appoint good, conservative judges that actually looks at the law and the facts, and not just legislate from the bench.

[so_real]

The Executive Branch is co-equal to the Judicial Branch. And the circuit courts are subordinate to both. If I were Trump, I would order the Department of Justice to prosecute all those not following the executive order and tell the circuit court to pound sand. If someone wants to sue, let them make a case for it through proper channels.

[Original Lurker]

Why?
Cuz pulic schooze may 4 stooooopid peebul.

[GizzyGirl]

I think Trumps plays Chess while they all play checkers so I have to believe there's an element of that here. It is not a game, don't get me wrong, but Trump has rightfully discredited the media, and with this he is discrediting both liberal courts and Democrats.

[Hostage]

My thoughts are that the President does not want his fight with the court to carry over to the solemn process of seating Judge Gorsuch.

I really believe that President Trump realizes that America will have Judge Gorsuch for a long, long, long time and he does not want to ruin the Judge’s chances by inflaming the court battle.

Judge Gorsuch will be confirmed.

President Trump will win the court case.

And everyone will look back and marvel at how well it was carried out.

[TomasUSMC]

This is a silly game the RegressiveLeft will play UNTIL THE ARE DETERRED FROM DOING IT AGAIN.

WHAT KIND OF DETERRENCE? ABOLISH THE ENTIRE FEDERAL COURT THAT ISSUES A STAY AND INSTANTLY THE SAME DAY REPLACE THEM WITH VERY VERY CONSERVATIVE JUDGES.

ONCE YOU DO THAT THE REGRESSIVES WILL SEE THEY ARE LOSING GROUND THE CAN’T AFFORD TO LOSE. THE SHIITE WILL STOP.

[donna]

Why is Anyone Going along with the 9th Circuit COA’s Illegal Ruling?

For the same reason God is not in our schools and homosexuals marry while we kill the unborn.

[lakecumberlandvet]

“Why are we going along with decisions made by judges that are—legally—not within their purview? Why are we continuing to follow rulings from rogue courts in our country that are illegal on their very face?”
___

That’s what I’m been wondering. The president should ignore the court’s unconstitutional rulings. Having the power and authority to take legitimate and constitutional presidential actions means nothing if you let a lawless court overrule you.

[Ray76]

Executive Order 13769, “Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States” cites 8 USC 1182(f) several times for its authority.

The Order issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit does not address the Executive Order's authority and instead conjures reasons why this authority can not be exercised.

The Court is interfering with the Executive's exercise of Congress's very clearly stated grant of authority. The Court is repudiating the will of Congress, and on the absurd pretense of granting due process rights to foreigners in foreign countries, foreigners who apparently have a right to enter the U.S.

The Court claims Trump's alleged religious bias as the basis for the seven countries subject to a temporary visa ban. The Executive Order cites 8 USC 1187(a)(12) as the basis for the seven countries subject to a temporary visa ban.

The Court agrees with the States' argument that the Executive Order causes a concrete and particularized injury to their public universities. The universities of Washington and Minnesota do not suffer a particularized injury. The injury (actual or potential) suffered by universities of Washington and Minnesota are no different from the injuries (actual or potential) suffered by universities of each and all states. The universities of all states - indeed all universities whether state owned or not - suffer identical injuries (actual or potential).

The Court's Order has no basis in fact, but on fantasy.

[marron]

Who appoints the judges on the 9th Circuit? Would that be the president?

Maybe over the course of his 8 years he can change the flavor of the court.

Meanwhile, he should get his man on the Supreme Court and then take it to the Supremes.

[From The Deer Stand]

We all know the 9th is den of liberal extremism that could care less about the Constitution and rule of law.

[eyeamok]

Maybe we need a 3 Strikes and your OUT Law for Judges. The 3rd time you are Overturned YOU’RE FIRED!

[jsanders2001]

Answer: