Skip to comments.
Major problem with Detroit’s ballots: Votes being counted more than once
Canada Free Press ^
| 12/07/16
| Dan Calabrese
Posted on 12/07/2016 7:02:27 AM PST by Sean_Anthony
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: Sean_Anthony
This’ll shut down Hillary’s recount effort in a flash.
2
posted on
12/07/2016 7:05:29 AM PST
by
Steely Tom
([VOTE FRAUD] == [CIVIL WAR])
To: Sean_Anthony
Correct me if I’m wrong, but Michigan law states that on a re-count....if the local precinct book and number of ballots cast at that precinct do not exactly match...then all ballots are rounded to zero at that precinct for anyone for the purpose of the re-count. So, Hillary had great numbers prior to the re-count, and if some judge doesn’t stop this, she’ll lose at least 250,000 Detroit votes (minimum). If I were the Green Party, I’d take all actions possible at this point to stop the re-count in Michigan.
To: Steely Tom
B-b-but... voter fraud doesn’t exist! Liberals were saying that the entire election!
To: Sean_Anthony
Deliberate “problems,” to be sure.
5
posted on
12/07/2016 7:06:58 AM PST
by
fwdude
(Stronger, To Get Her)
To: Sean_Anthony
Major problem with Detroits ballots: Votes being counted more than once "counted more than once" - I'd put money that these weren't "Trump ballots".
6
posted on
12/07/2016 7:07:25 AM PST
by
The Sons of Liberty
(Trump is not even President yet, but he has already accomplished more than 8 yrs of 0bama!)
To: ObozoMustGo2012
NOT A SMIDGEN OF CORRUPTION!!!!!!!
To: Sean_Anthony
8
posted on
12/07/2016 7:08:14 AM PST
by
Mr. K
( Trump kicked her ass 2-to-1 if you remove all the voter fraud.)
To: pepsionice
oppps
lol
couldn’t happen to a better group
9
posted on
12/07/2016 7:09:54 AM PST
by
arl295
To: pepsionice
” If I were the Green Party, Id take all actions possible at this point to stop the re-count in Michigan.”
Why would this scenario affect the amount of money that Stein is getting for this ruse? It behooves her to keep up this charade until the money dries up.
10
posted on
12/07/2016 7:10:30 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
To: pepsionice
Correct me if Im wrong, but Michigan law states that on a re-count....if the local precinct book and number of ballots cast at that precinct do not exactly match...then all ballots are rounded to zero at that precinct for anyone for the purpose of the re-count. I think yesterday's thread indicated that the initial winner of the precinct would be certified, in the event of this kind of discrepancy. However the ballots in the precincts in question could not be subject to a recount.
But I could be wrong.
To: Sean_Anthony
Rigged. Like we didn’t know. DemRats gotta cheat. It’s what they do. Time for a national voter ID and votes verified system to eliminate fraud.
12
posted on
12/07/2016 7:11:47 AM PST
by
tflabo
(Truth or tyranny (agent Able Deplor))
To: Sean_Anthony
I was just asking how many times they ran those votes through those machines. Can we fix this yet? How many elections have been stolen this way? Has Michigan *ever* really voted Democrat?
13
posted on
12/07/2016 7:12:46 AM PST
by
calenel
(The Democratic Party is a Criminal Enterprise. It is the Socialist Mafia.)
To: pepsionice
No, if they can't reconcile, it reverts to the certified vote count.
In other words, the more massive the fraud that's uncovered, the more it's ignored.
Which is what will happen with the Detroit vote count.
To: pepsionice
Michigan's law, which dates to 1954, excludes from recount precincts where "the number of ballots to be recounted and the number of ballots issued on election day as shown on the poll list or the computer printout do not match and the difference is not explained to the satisfaction of the board of canvassers."
In those cases, the vote total approved by the November canvass stands.
To: M. Thatcher
Yep, the recount law makes it possible to hide ballot stuffing from a recount. Stuff the ballots, register a small variance and viola, no recount!
16
posted on
12/07/2016 7:17:01 AM PST
by
dirtboy
To: pepsionice
According to state law, precincts whose poll books dont match with ballots cant be recounted. If that happens, original election results stand. Its not good, conceded Daniel Baxter, elections director for the city of Detroit.
I could be wrong, but it looks like the original count stands. A recount isn't allowed in the case of a discrepancy between the poll books and the ballots.
To: Sean_Anthony
Looks like reconciling totals needs to be part of the INITIAL count process.
18
posted on
12/07/2016 7:17:27 AM PST
by
fruser1
To: Sean_Anthony
Major problem with Detroits ballots: Votes being counted more than once... It's only a major problem for those of us who want our elections to be fair and honest...
19
posted on
12/07/2016 7:18:56 AM PST
by
WayneS
(An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. - Winston Churchill)
To: Sean_Anthony
Abbott and Costello routine , 1 for you and 1,2,3 for me
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson