![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/db/Mark_A._Goldsmith_District_Judge.jpg/220px-Mark_A._Goldsmith_District_Judge.jpg)
Barack Obama appointed Judge Mark Goldsmith
1 posted on
12/05/2016 6:24:52 AM PST by
KeyLargo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
To: KeyLargo
83 posted on
12/05/2016 7:11:43 AM PST by
timestax
(American Media = Domestic Enemy)
To: KeyLargo
84 posted on
12/05/2016 7:12:09 AM PST by
timestax
(American Media = Domestic Enemy)
To: KeyLargo
Is that EGGHEAD(Vincent Price) the Batman villain?
88 posted on
12/05/2016 7:21:48 AM PST by
LeonardFMason
(LanceyHoward would AGREE)
To: KeyLargo
And here I thought CONE HEADS were just imaginary creatures on Saturday Night Live.
89 posted on
12/05/2016 7:26:46 AM PST by
IC Ken
To: KeyLargo
Yet, the idiots ignore the real vote fraud in Clark Co, NV where a recount and clean up of the voter rolls would give the state to Trump!
91 posted on
12/05/2016 7:31:49 AM PST by
CAluvdubya
(<---has now left CA for NV, where God/guns have not been outlawed! She's done and he's won!)
To: KeyLargo
There is no set number of votes specified in the US Constitution as far as Electoral Votes, simply a majority...therefore the number "270" represents a majority of those currently available, based upon the number of states currently in the Union.
If those three states are denied to ANYONE as a result of some sort of miscount, judicial action, etc, then they are lost to the number of EV's available to count toward the majority.
In other words, however they may be denied, they will be denied to all candidates and not simply taken from the leading candidate's (as in Trump) total...which in effect reduces the number that comprises a majority within the Union.
So...I really don't see the point of the cry baby arse holes and their machinations.
Realistically, what they are doing is simply disenfranchising all the voters of the contested states...making the entire process disappear for all, not just the R's, the D's or the nut job Greens.
92 posted on
12/05/2016 7:33:18 AM PST by
OldSmaj
(The only thing washed on a filthy liberal is their damned brains.)
To: KeyLargo
Looks too much like Egghead (Vincent Price) from Batman:
![](http://images.mentalfloss.com/sites/default/files/styles/insert_main_wide_image/public/snapshot-2014-11-18-at-04_25_26-pm-33955685.jpg)
94 posted on
12/05/2016 7:45:59 AM PST by
Ciaphas Cain
(The choice to be stupid is not a conviction I am obligated to respect.)
To: KeyLargo
Election law is a state prerogative
Federal government and federal judges has no right interfering
95 posted on
12/05/2016 7:51:18 AM PST by
rdcbn
("There is no means of avoiding a final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alt)
To: KeyLargo
Stein has no standing.
This judge is a hack. Nothing more.
97 posted on
12/05/2016 7:56:38 AM PST by
tennmountainman
("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance)
To: KeyLargo
Not to worry. We can trust the Republican-controlled Congress to impeach and remove the judge if he ignores the Constitution and the law. [GIGANTIC SARCASM OFF]
To: KeyLargo
Wow. The Coneheads are real.
101 posted on
12/05/2016 8:43:01 AM PST by
justa-hairyape
(The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
To: KeyLargo
105 posted on
12/05/2016 9:31:28 AM PST by
Rannug
("all enemies, foreign and : domestic")
To: KeyLargo
I am intrigued that a single Federal judge can by-pass or ignore a State’s Supreme Court especially on an issue of States’ rights...
Who determines if this judge has authority to change a State’s laws, the judge???
107 posted on
12/05/2016 9:47:47 AM PST by
Iscool
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson