Efforts Begin To Challenge States Clinton Won

Resistance Feed ^ | 11-25-2016 | Rhett October

[21twelve]

“To whom they are “praying”, is a mystery.”

Probably the new Saint Fidel.

[jimfree]

Because that is how it is done.

[ronnie raygun]

What does jill have to gain from all of this? nothing! her money comes from soros and the clinton foundation, nuff sed!

[trebb]

to quote 20+ judges... Jill just doesn’t have the standing to challenge

And yet there are reports that Wisconsin os going to recount....

[VanDeKoik]

How about no?

Does no work for you?

If you don’t like you kooky conspiracy crap called out, then try to formulate something that make sense.

[exDemMom]

Maybe ballots should be printed with people’s name and address on them, where the choices are randomized to prevent “template” filling, and then have people turn them in in-person showing ID.

No, you don't want names and addresses on the ballots, that opens the door wide for tyranny.

What can be done is for each ballot to have a serial number, and for the serial numbers to be marked first, when a ballot is handed to a voter, and second, when the ballot is turned in for the count. Each person would have to show an ID to receive a ballot, but the serial number would not be linked to the person's name.

Any serial numbers not used at the time the polls close would become invalid at that time.

There are so many technologies in use for validation of documents such as driver's licenses--it is ridiculous that ballot counterfeiting should be so easy.

[BeauBo]

Shine some sunshine where the Democrats cheated.

Then watch them scurry for cover.

They are not that strong if the opposition is only willing to fight.

Prosecute a few, and expose their methods.

[humblegunner]

It is news.

It's a blog. It belongs in the blog section. If at all.

It’s a news website, not a blog.

You recycle other people's material, creating none yourself. It's a blog.
Pay attention, son.

It clearly contributed information that generated a lot of discussion here and the pertinent info was provided in the excerpt.

Yeah, about that excerpt.. since you "wrote" it, you can post the whole thing rather than try to drive FR's traffic to your questionable blog.

It is news.

We covered that. It's your blog.

[Gay State Conservative]

Don’t forget New Hampshire.

Boy,you've got *that* right.It became a "same day registration" state a few years ago thanks to a small window when the Rats controlled everything.Since then Republican legislatures have tried to repeal it only to be thwarted by Rat Governors.The result...every November of an even year...particularly a Summer Olympics year...bus loads,AND BUS LOADS,of homeless schizophrenics and addicts come up from Massachusetts,claim to live in NH and then vote.

Senator Scott Brown is convinced (and the numbers he presented support his claim) that he was denied a Senate seat thanks to that massive fraud.Former Governor Sununu has said that there's not a damn thing that can be done to stop it...short of repealing the law.

Trump "lost" by a whisker...as did Ayotte.Fraud is the answer.

And yes,I know...Ayotte's a RINO.So she votes with the GOP maybe 50% of the time.I guarantee you that the pig who "defeated" her will vote with the GOP 0.00% of the time!

[virgil]

Is it constitutional to cast aside EVe for a whole state because certification doesn’t meet the deadline? I thought everybody’s vote is supposed to count, or something like that.

[odawg]

“There are so many technologies in use for validation of documents such as driver’s licenses—it is ridiculous that ballot counterfeiting should be so easy.”

But securing voting integrity gets into the area of racism, white nationalism, white privilege, holdover form Anglo-Saxon prejudice, and according to Obama, everyone becomes pure and sinless when it comes time to vote and it is crude and boorish to suspect voter fraud, ever.

[Flavious_Maximus]

Also Clinton stole Maine and New Mexico by less than 20,000 votes.

There are a lot of illegals in New Mexico and a lot of Somali’s in Maine.

Heck, Clinton even won Oregon by less than the amount Trump won Pennsylvania.

[WashingtonSource]

Didn’t New Hampshire however elect a GOP governor and now has a GOP legislature?

[TimPatriot]

Don’t forget New Hampshire

Scot Brown Brown was all over the place the weekend before the election saying that NH has same day voter registration, that the dems bus people in from MA and they say they have a Domicile in NH and forgot their ID, or something to that effect. Said that is why he lost and why Romney lost NH. They know the approximate numbers.

[Gay State Conservative]

Didn’t New Hampshire however elect a GOP governor and now has a GOP legislature?

I believe that's correct,However I think it's been a while since NH had both a Republican legislature and Governor at the same time.

[StAnDeliver]

"The House of Representatives has to vote to accept the electoral college votes from each state. If, in fact, it looks like an attempt to steal the election is underway, the House can (and hopefully will) refuse to accept the “new” results. This happened once before in the Hays-Tilden election."

Shhh, don't talk sense to these people.

[NFHale]

RE “Trump... Call”

It’s a BEAUTIFUL thing to finally see a Republican with a brass set of cajones, the FYou money, and the WILL to fight back, ain’t it?

[Caipirabob]

This bothered me in 2000 with the attempt to steal Florida, however strangely enough, I am not really feeling like this is a threat. Rather, it smells like desperation and fear on the part of the left. I mean, usually I follow these things but from my general observation and reading, this is more diaper-baby tantrum stuff than an actual threat. Yes, there is obviously an end game here but it is from the same people who believed their polls of a Hillary blow-out were true.

And they will fail again.

However, I do agree that the people involved here must be exposed for who and what they are.

[dsm69]

It makes sense alright except this like you who lack English comprehension, numbnuts.

Haven’t you been told before by the mods to stop disrupting threads?

[shibumi]

And (as if by magic) this thread is now in “Bloggers” where it belongs.

But probably that’s only because we don’t have a section yet for “Re-Bloggers.”

You know Gunner, our wee buddy rhett can’t really post this unexcerpted because what he is attempting to call “news” is actually a re-blog of the Oathkeepers website. just about every paragraph in the article begins with “Navy Jack said this...” or “On the Oathkeepers site it says this...”

Of course the honest way to do this would be to simply post the Oathkeepers article and let them get the hits for what they wrote and put his two sentences of comment on the forum like everyone else.

But nooo.....