To: rockrr
And they deliberately termed it a perpetual union, not a loose confederation of convenience. You cannot invoke a right given by God to justify your own independence, and then claim it is constrained by man.
347 posted on
11/29/2016 9:25:02 AM PST by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: DiogenesLamp
You cannot invoke a right given by God to justify your own independence, and then claim it is constrained by man. Then how can you constrain it by placing burdens on California before allowing them to leave?
To: DiogenesLamp; rockrr; DoodleDawg
DiogenesLamp to rockrr:
"You cannot invoke a right given by God to justify your own independence, and then claim it is constrained by man." No Founder -- none -- ever claimed an unrestricted "right of secession" at pleasure.
All considered as legitimate disunion by mutual consent, or from necessity caused by oppression.
But secession "at pleasure" was simply treason, for which they had no tolerance.
383 posted on
12/03/2016 10:11:12 AM PST by
BroJoeK
(a little historical perspective...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson