Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Ohioan

I added the bureaucrats to it because those are among the ever-shrinking number of people who fit any economic/financial definition of a “middle class.”


85 posted on 10/21/2016 7:40:17 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

To me, the middle class gained in prosperity, through much of our history—until we were cursed with the Clinton/Bush/Obama scourge;—but it is not just an economic concept. It is basically those above subsistence farming & unskilled or very little skilled urbanites, but still below the great Plantation owners in the old South, or the Cabots & Lodges of Massachusetts, or the Rosevelts & Vanderbilts in New York; but those who have developed skills, at least some accumulated assets, who save & accumulate wealth at a lower level than the foregoing—but maintain an independence from Government, as they climb the ladder of success. (I know that is a bit garbled but I got interrupted.)


88 posted on 10/21/2016 8:17:55 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson