Posted on 10/18/2016 8:19:58 AM PDT by TheRef
The state polls tell a different story than the national polls. Even if the national polls are accurate, and I am showing a five-point Hillary lead, none other than Nate Silver acknowledges Trump could win fairly easily without winning the national popular vote. Funny how he's dropped that point lately.
Further, Clinton has had every advantage and she is not solidified close to fifty percent in polling. Normally, this represents a tell tale sign of likely defeat, but fivethirtyeight.com explains that away. Their analysis, however, largely applies to early polling, so what about the fifty percent rule now? Perhaps they should revisit that question.
National polls that sharply diverge from bellwether state polls should be ignored. They are not reflecting what is going on where it really matters, the battleground states. The track record of battleground states, furthermore, in reflecting the actual national popular vote is likely a better indicator of where the national popular vote will actually fall. Why does the national media breathlessly report the most extreme national polls which pollsters know are the least accurate? It's hard to blame anything but media bias. Our nation elects presidents through fifty-one state elections and polls of those elections reflect a close race. It's certainly not an eleven or twelve point race.
The state polling tells a story of a fairly close race by historic standards, certainly a race that can go either way considering all of the new information we are likely to see between now and election day, most of which is bad for Hillary Clinton. It seems like the national media knows this and is trying to finish off Donald Trump so nobody bothers to ask if Hillary Clinton should be president. More on those state polls in a moment. First lets take a look at my national popular vote projection. It shows Trump behind by about five points.
National Polls |
Ref's Projection: Clinton +5.1% Clinton 45.9, Trump 40.8 |
How does my projection stack up when considering state polls? Very well. Even Nate Silver, who does tend to favor Democrats in his analysis, acknowledges that state polls overall seem to suggest a national lead of about seven points. He also acknowledges that yesterday's CNN polls are consistent with a national lead for Hillary of around three or four points. So I think the middle ground of five points looks about right. But of what use is national polling really? The truth, not much. |
|
Polling the nation is always less precise than polling a state. Why? There are 310,000,000 Americans and 51 Electoral Jurisdictions, so there is much greater opportunity for polling errors. |
2012 Electoral College Map |
My projection is designed to limit the impact of outlier polls because of this imprecision. Unfortunately, polls with extreme results often get reported breathlessly by the media despite their detachment from reality, like the two polls to the right, which I have heard about constantly. Boo! Dishonest! |
EXTREME RESULTS Monmouth, 726 Likely Voters, 12-Point Clinton lead NBC/WSJ, 908 Likely Voters, 11-point lead for Clinton
|
REUTERS/IPSOS shows slightly bigger leads for Clinton, but does not reflect a large national lead |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CNN showed us a battleground state race consistent with a 3 or 4 point national lead for Hillary |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
My battleground state breakdownTrump has a very good chance of winning 265 electoral votes by winning the following states, FL, NC, OH, IA, AZ and NV. His problem comes in that he needs to add one more state from the following list. CO, NH, WI, MI, NM, PA or ME. MUST WIN STATES: He leads in Iowa and Arizona. He is within a point in Ohio and North Carolina. He trails by three points in Florida and Nevada. These are not bad numbers for Trump considering the disastrous two weeks he has had. He could turn these around with a good debate performance, some media focus on Hillary's problems or both. HE NEEDS TO WIN ONE OF THESE SEVEN: His chances in Colorado, Wisconsin and Michigan are probably not very good. He can still win either New Hampshire where he trails by 4.5%, and he has shown an ability to make Pennsylvania close, where he trails by 5.8%. New Mexico, if it votes in large numbers for Johnson, could be a Hail Mary pass for Trump. Trump has also made it close in Maine, but he's pretty far behind there now. So there's a very good chance it could all come down to New Hampshire where I think his chances are better than most people think. It's a small state where he can equal Hillary's spending. He also plays well there culturally as a northeastern rebel. Ref's Battleground Index
My Twitter account is just getting started. Follow me here!
|
LOL What is the D+ sample?
Elections ALWAYS ‘tighten up’ the last few weeks of the campaign. Given the difference between the two candidates is well withing the margin of error AND how polling have oversampled dems, I would say the advantage goes to the challenger, Trump.
Drill down on EVERY ONE of the polls above and you will find they ALL start with the assumption that the race will be D+5 AT LEAST.
Here's my take on it, in fewer words.
The polls have been skewed from the gitgo....however as D-Day approaches, in order to maintain their reputations plus future income and their very existence, the polling companies cannot afford to have had wildly incorrect/slanted results the day before election.
Therefore, the ratings between the two candidates will narrow as election day looms.
Rush touched on this exact same thing last week.
It's my feeling that Mr. Trump has been (with some obvious exceptions) leading the race by a comfortable margin across the fruited plain.
That's my take on the presidential polling situation....and I approve my own message.
Leni
D+5?
You’re being too generous!
More like D+8 or D+9!!
Well that was one of the best noob posts I’ve seen.
I also agree with your decision and I second it...
I approve of your message, too.
It is a pure waste of time to read stories about polls so why post them here on FR? The polls that actually publish who was in the sample and the margin of error prove their worthlessness due to the heavy imbalance of Dems+Independents polled compared with Repubs, plus the margin of error is usually so big that the results are pretty much flat. Any Poll that does not provide the sample information and margin of error should be completely ignored, like Monmouth.
Trump is bringing people out who will vote for the first time in a long time. The real problem is the Electoral College. The Big Commie-Hellhole Cities like NYC, Chicago, Detroit, Los Angeles, etc. overwhelm the vote in the most populous states. This is where the voter and election fraud will go to levels never before seen in the most banana of republics. This is War, my fellow Americans.
It is a pure waste of time to read stories about polls so why post them here on FR? The polls that actually publish who was in the sample and the margin of error prove their worthlessness due to the heavy imbalance of Dems+Independents polled compared with Repubs, plus the margin of error is usually so big that the results are pretty much flat. Any Poll that does not provide the sample information and margin of error should be completely ignored, like Monmouth.
Trump is bringing people out who will vote for the first time in a long time. The real problem is the Electoral College. The Big Commie-Hellhole Cities like NYC, Chicago, Detroit, Los Angeles, etc. overwhelm the vote in the most populous states. This is where the voter and election fraud will go to levels never before seen in the most banana of republics. This is War, my fellow Americans.
It is interesting that Trump is never ahead in any of these polls.
The polls have been bogus propaganda since Day One. The MSM, GOPe, and RATs are employing Goebbels, Tokyo Rose, Baghdad Bob tactics on We The People since the beginning. That proves just how STUPID the vermin smugly and arrogantly think We The People are. They consider We The People to be mindless sheeple to be used and abused at their will. Make you angry yet?
Was angry a long time ago. The same media which is in the bag for Clinton is manipulating the polls so no one will question bogus ballots in a close race.
Was angry a long time ago. The same media which is in the bag for Clinton is manipulating the polls so no one will question bogus ballots in a close race.
Well, I said at least. I was trying to be “conservative”.
Very!
besides putting all kinds of "special sauce" on their polls, the pollsters are using OUTDATED figures; figures from the last two presidential races, which have less than NOTHING at all to do with turnout for Hillary. Her "plumbing" isn't as "exciting" as wee Barry's skin color and phony background story.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.