Does WikiLeaks Have Hillary Clinton’s October Surprise?

The Federalist ^ | August 15, 2016 | James H. Hyde

[2ndDivisionVet]

The New York Times reports that in the latest release of Clinton documents, billionaire donors to the Clinton Foundation tried to curry favors from a responsive State Department when Hillary Clinton was U.S. secretary of State. That gambit is known as the “pay-to-play” scandal. Give the foundation a big fat donation, and Hillary will open whatever door you need opened. In fact, as secretary, she approved a now-famous deal that granted the Russians control over 20 percent of uranium production here in the United States.

Despite all of this, Hillary, as usual, got off scot-free. But while she may think she’s got smooth sailing ahead, she needs to consider the albatross dangling from her neck. The latest emails handed over to Judicial Watch, which sued over spurned or ignored Freedom of Information Act requests, are very revealing. As in “The Rime of the Mariner,” she may well find no wind in her sails when highly damaging Clinton Foundation information is made public. Julian Assange, true to his promise to release new material about the Clintons, did so most recently on the international classified information-leaking website WikiLeaks on August 8....

[laplata]

FYI

[MrChips]

Well, let's assume it is true. The problem is, if he waits until October, it might be too late. The sheeple will have made up their minds, Trump will have continued to be trashed by the Media (PRAVDA), and, let's not forget, there is early voting.

If he does it earlier, Hillary would have to step down and be replaced by . . . a very popular Bernie, or a very popular (barf) Joe Biden. The masses would rally to them as saviors from the evil Republicans.

So, maybe doing it "in stages" is the best way!

[Shanghai Dan]

I believe most States lock the ballot around 60-90 days before the election. Once you hit that time - you can no longer change candidates (which is how you end up with dead people running).

So holding the information until that deadline hits is smart; it prevents a replacement of Hillary! with anyone else. And it is close enough to the election that it WILL be in the news and front-and-center in the debates, but still before early mail-in voting (which is usually 30 days prior).

The best time to drop this kind of stuff is September - after the ballots are locked, and before mail-in ballots are cast. That's the time to unleash the dogs of war...

[kabar]

Before the first debate would be optimum. Early voting starts in October.

[DrDude]

Doing it in stages may be okay. He needs the big hit to take place just before the debates. If they ever occur. No time for the MSM to prop her up.

[atc23]

So it's "unacceptable" for a foreign entity to rig the election but it's ok for the US Lamestream media to rig the election?

Got it

[Red Badger]

Yeah? Tell that to Robert Torricelli.!!!!!......

[ColdOne]

Yes the torch Torricelli

[Red Badger]

Heck! I think the ballots had even been printed with his name!...........

[NImerc]

Does it even matter? The MSM has completely sold out at this point and has pretty much ignored everything coming from WikiLeaks, and blackballed anyone seeking to disseminate the info. The only sources actually reporting this info, are sources that we Trump supporters already tune into and Dems avoid. There is NO WAY any MSM source will drop an October surprise on their beloved candidate.

[beef]

I do not trust wikileaks. I am concerned they are releasing this about Hillary now so that when they release the Trump dump in October they cannot be accused of being one-sided. I hope I am wrong.

[Toespi]

It won’t matter. It won’t matter. It won’t matter. There is nothing that can be done except for Trump to begin acting like a serious contender and beat her. She is not going to have a drop to the floor swallowing her tongue seizure, she is not going to be indicted, all the polls can’t be wrong, and media is going to defend her at all cost.

[17th Miss Regt]

It may be an international organization but that will not help. If Hillary wins she will send out teams of assassins to kill off the Wikileaks folks. Stalin would not give up on killing Trotsky and she will not give up on killing them.

[BBell]

She's like a gum ball machine. You put money in, she puts out.

[TomServo]

Let’s pretend the answer is ‘No’ so that we don’t hang our hopes on something that will never happen and we instead focus on the ‘Now’...

[laplata]

I can’t argue with anything you said. We’re seeing evil at work.

[Mannaggia l'America]

I do not trust wikileaks. I am concerned they are releasing this about Hillary now so that when they release the Trump dump in October they cannot be accused of being one-sided. I hope I am wrong.

I agree. While I have no sympathy for the Democrats or Clinton in regards to the DNC email hack, it can just as easily happen to the RCN or Trump - and I have no doubt there are not thousands out there trying.

And there should be no doubt - the WikiLeaks people are liberal/socialist/communist. They hate Trump even more than Hillary. Never trust liberals. Ever.

The old adage "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" does not apply. Liberals are ALWAYS the enemy.

[ncfool]

I pray every day that October is going bring us that special surprised.

[JudyinCanada]

I just watched Clinton Cash and I’m livid.

I can’t believe that she has gotten away with such evil. I pray to God that she gets exposed, along with her rapist husband, and the daughter, Chelsea Hubbel....there’s no way she can be innocent.