It’s not political correctness that will cause the demise of Western Civilization, but it will be moral softness and inability to achieve the level of savagery necessary to kill every man, woman, and child of the enemy that threatens our survival.
As survival of the fittest is still being contested here on the third planet, if a people become too civilized to do what’s necessary to survive in an uncivilized world, they won’t survive, they no longer deserve to survive, and good riddance.
Committing suicide.
The idea that all cultures have the same worth is very much at variance with reality.
Tolerance for tolerance’s sake is not a virtue. Diversity is not a value.
What’s going on now is not immigration, legal or illegal. It is an invasion by hostile forces.
Treason? How about committing suicide?
Political objectives have nothing to do with God and everything to do with man.
Better.
Well said by James Wilson. Thanks for posting it.
I always gave GWB the benefit of the doubt when he used adjectives such as “peaceful” in conjunction with “Islam”, for two reasons, listed below. However, In retrospect, there were flaws in that support that I didn’t consider fully at the time:
1.) There certainly are muslims who aren’t personally interested in violence and domination. On muslims who are not personally interested, I still feel strongly about this. However, I have since come to recognize that those muslims who aren’t personally interested in violence towards, or subjugation of others, have three main issues:
a) First, the muslims who ARE interested in subjugation are going to cow or kill the non-aggressive muslims. The voice of those non-aggressive muslims does not in any way count or have a voice in reining in the violent ones. No offense to peaceful muslims, but they are as useless as teats on a Bull.
b) Secondly, they can easily be labeled as apostates by the radicals and killed or injured as a result.
c) Third, like any other normal person, they may not agree with the radicals, but because they feel that they are personally attacked, may end up not only being sympathetic to the radicals and not speaking out, may actually begin to aid and abet them in a variety of indirect ways, and as a result, will become indistinguishable from the radicals and therefore...radical muslims. In addition, the concept of taqiya, which is unknown in Christianity, gives them the moral green light to lie and deceive in order to advance Islam. It leaves us as non-muslims very little choice but to have to view them as a monolithic group.
2.) I felt GWB had to say what he did to get as many people on board with what we had to do.
a) The flaw here is that, due to the dynamics of item #1, IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE WHO IS ‘ON BOARD’ with us, and who isn’t. I still agree with the initial approach, and I support that we tried it (I feel that we had to do it) but I hope going forward, we recognize (the USA, if not the Western World) that it isn’t going to work, no matter how many muslims appear to be “moderate” living under the thumbs of radicals such as the Taliban and ISIS, they cannot effectively combat radical Islam. If we depend on them to “help us”, we will be disappointed at best, and fail at worst.
We are committing suicide by our own hands