Posted on 07/19/2016 12:20:47 PM PDT by grundle
According to this report from WREG, this report from WMC, this report from WIS, and this report from NBC, on July 11, 2016, in Memphis, Tennessee, Black Lives Matter protestors blocked an ambulance that was trying to get to a child, after the same Black Lives Matter protestors had blocked the same child’s parents’ car from taking him to the hospital.
However, despite all of this evidence from multiple reliable sources, snopes claims that the incident is a “total falsehood.”
How did snopes manage to do this? By adding on false information to the original story, such as the false claim that the child needed a “heart transplant,” as well as the false claim that the child had “expired.” Those claims were, indeed, false. But no reliable source ever made those claims in the first place.
For snopes to label the entire incident as a “total falsehood” is to say that the entire incident never happened. And that claim by snopes is the real falsehood.
Oops! My fault! It should have been a double negative, not a triple one. However, the full title in the actual article is correct.
Yes. You are correct. Thanks for pointing that out to me.
And have you watched movies or television shows lately? They all come with big heapin helpings of propaganda woven into the storyline.
But then - What should we expect from a tool who names himself after his own gooch?
It’s ending this week, but if you get a chance, try and catch Containment. It’s almost laughable how over the top all the PC is . . .
I cannot abide modern shows. Every other moment that are trying to shove some sort of Homo message in our face, and in between those times they are trying to shovel socialism, anti-capitalism, anti-gun, anti-free speech, and anti everything else that matters.
Oh, and "Global Warming" Crap.
snopes is an anti Christian, anti republic piece of ####.
Always has been.
I notice that snopes discounts most theories about the Clintons.
Not that we don’t know the answer already, but has their EVER BEEN a significant issue they’ve addressed when they came out on our side?
...and my point there is that if they were really UNBIASED, then they should be coming down roughly equally on both sides of the political spectrum.
Snopes is a lying leftist propaganda outlet. Leftists use it as a “source” to rebut conservatives; that’s what it was created for
Snopes—commie disinformation
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.