Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge to Hillary’s IT lackey: Before you take the Fifth, let’s see that immunity deal, bro
Canada Free Press ^ | 06/06/16 | Dan Calabrese

Posted on 06/06/2016 9:08:50 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony

Smacked down

Judge to Hillary’s IT lackey: Before you take the Fifth, let’s see that immunity deal, bro

If you observe the way people from HillaryWorld operate, you could be forgiven for thinking anyone can invoke the Fifth Amendment any time they just don’t feel like answering a question. That’s certainly the way Bryan Pagliano seems to be playing it. Even though he’s been given immunity from prosecution by the Justice Department, and can cite almost no serious risk of self-incrimination, the guy who set up Hillary’s schlock, homebrew e-mail server still seems to think he can take the Fifth rather than answer questions in a deposition by Judicial Watch - the conservative legal group that’s suing for the release of public records Hillary wants hidden.

Can he?


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintongate; differentcase; fifthamendment; immunity; notthesamecase
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: justlurking

That’s not true. If he has transactional immunity then his immunity applies anytime. If it’s use immunity, then it only applies to the criminal case.

Either way, you don’t have unlimited rights to refuse to testify in a civil case. The judge is absolutely correct in making him produce the immunity agreement, and to force him to state the basis of asserting the 5th. There has to be real reason to believe his testimony exposes criminal wrongdoing on his part.

Also, you CANNOT take the fifth if you fear you might commit perjury—so if his deposition testimony is different than his FBI testimony he’s screwed.


21 posted on 06/06/2016 9:47:02 AM PDT by Velvet_Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tbw2
Is someone allowed to get an immunity deal AND plead the fifth? Wouldn’t the latter nullify the former?

I'm really getting tired of posting this, but again:

This is a civil FOIA case brought by Judicial Watch. It is completely separate from the criminal case being investigated by the FBI.

The FBI's immunity in the criminal case doesn't force Pagliano to testify in the civil case. In fact, there are very good reasons for him to NOT testify.

See the link in post #18, and search for comments by "Sherlock". He explains it much better than I can, and he appears to have personal experience in the matter.

22 posted on 06/06/2016 9:48:33 AM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Most of what Sherlock said in that thread is inaccurate. He doesn’t know what the immunity deal with Pagliano was, so he can’t say for sure how it affects the JW case.

And regardless, 5th amendment protections are very limited in civil cases. There’s no blanket 5th amendment protection where you just say “I take the 5th” and walk out.


23 posted on 06/06/2016 9:55:52 AM PDT by Velvet_Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

People still keep looking for justice and equal treatment before the law in spite of there being abundant evidence to the contrary. In our country accountability is rare indeed, with politics, power and money trumping all. Its good to be among the protected class of political elites.


24 posted on 06/06/2016 9:56:57 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

The Conservative Treehouse also have a more recent article discussing Sullivan’s requirement for an explanation of the immunity agreement:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/06/04/federal-judge-orders-clinton-i-t-official-to-explain-immunity-agreement-delays-deposition/#more-117050

And again FReepers can avoid a lot of good-natured noise in the comments by just searching for “Sherlock”.


25 posted on 06/06/2016 9:58:03 AM PDT by agere_contra (Hamas has dug miles of tunnels - but no bomb-shelters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Velvet_Jones

Yes that’s right: for instance Sherlock didn’t expect that Sullivan would ask for an explanation of the deal.

We can’t blame him for not knowing what the immunity deal is though, as that’s kind of the point behind Sullivan’s action - very few people know what the deal is. Indeed the FBI may fight to stop it becoming public.

Sherlock does go into ‘use’ vs ‘transactional’ immunity in the new Treehouse thread.


26 posted on 06/06/2016 10:03:32 AM PDT by agere_contra (Hamas has dug miles of tunnels - but no bomb-shelters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

Thank you for the explanation. I had not seen it.


27 posted on 06/06/2016 10:12:02 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Thank you.


28 posted on 06/06/2016 10:12:14 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Just to enlarge on Velvet’s point: in civil actions there is no prosecutor.

The 5th Amendment issue then becomes whether or not the person claiming the protection is facing substantial, real hazards of self-incrimination if he gives testimony.


29 posted on 06/06/2016 10:15:41 AM PDT by agere_contra (Hamas has dug miles of tunnels - but no bomb-shelters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

https://www.justice.gov/usam/usam-9-23000-witness-immunity

doj witness immunity guidelines


30 posted on 06/06/2016 10:18:09 AM PDT by rolling_stone (1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

BUT—even if he only has use immunity, or some other informal immunity agreement, he could still be forced to testify and answer questions that would not put him in jeopardy. The 5th only applies to questions that could lead to a criminal prosecution, and that’s why Sullivan is also asking for the basis for his 5th amendment claims.


31 posted on 06/06/2016 10:23:21 AM PDT by Velvet_Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Why not just pull a Cheryl Mills and repeat over and over “I forgot or I can’t remember”?


32 posted on 06/06/2016 10:24:22 AM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: surrey

If he’s asked the same questions as he was asked in the FBI investigation, but gives different answers or claims he can’t remember he can be prosecuted for perjury.

There are no 5th amendment protections against perjury.


33 posted on 06/06/2016 10:27:05 AM PDT by Velvet_Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Velvet_Jones

Yes, that’s true. Sullivan is acting completely properly, even if it is discomfiting the FBI’s case.

If I’ve understood all this correctly: the broader Pagliano’s immunity deal is, the wider the scope of testimony that could be compelled from him.

Also: Pagliano’s lawyer will have to show why Pagliano has a substantial fear of self-incrimination.


34 posted on 06/06/2016 10:33:56 AM PDT by agere_contra (Hamas has dug miles of tunnels - but no bomb-shelters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Why are these stories coming from Canada and not the MSM?


35 posted on 06/06/2016 10:39:15 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Regardless of the type of Immunity, I believe there is a bigger question in the Judge’s mind. The Agreement is with the DOJ not the FBI. The DOJ are lawyers. They have been running interference for Hillary against the FBI. What if the Immunity Agreement is a sham and the FBI doesn’t grasp the consequences and/or know the DOJ is playing them. This Judge may be assuring there really is a legitimate deal in place.
I wouldn’t put anything past the DOJ.


36 posted on 06/06/2016 10:51:30 AM PDT by DrDude (Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Velvet_Jones

You are incorrect, as were many of the people responding to Sherlock in that thread. You can assert your privilege in a civil case, and refuse to testify. However, if you do, the other side can use that against you, and there can be inferences drawn against you. For that reason, Judges will often grant a stay of a civil case to let a criminal case be concluded, and allow the civil case to be decided on the merits. They don’t have to grant the stay, though, and I have often argued against it.


37 posted on 06/06/2016 10:56:16 AM PDT by Defiant (After 8 years of Chump Change, it's time for Trump Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: surrey
Why not just pull a Cheryl Mills and repeat over and over “I forgot or I can’t remember”?

If his testimony to the FBI ever becomes public, then he risks a perjury charge for contradicting it.

38 posted on 06/06/2016 11:26:37 AM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

“...we all want him - to plead the 5th in the civil case so that Hillary doesn’t get wind of what he knows for the criminal case.”

To stay on HRC’s “good side”, what’s stopping him from telling her what he has spilled to the Feds?


39 posted on 06/06/2016 11:39:34 AM PDT by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
The FBI want him - and we all want him - to plead the 5th in the civil case so that Hillary doesn’t get wind of what he knows for the criminal case.

I do believe he's using Hillary's lawyers. She knows everything he's going to say.

40 posted on 06/06/2016 12:04:12 PM PDT by zeugma (Welcome to the "interesting times" you were warned about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson