Posted on 05/25/2016 10:05:13 AM PDT by Pollard
Good writer. Intelligent, succinct and readable by all. Like most things I post, good ammo and/or learning material to counter the social revolution and ruin of our Country.
He also has several articles on Personal Liberty
"There are very few legitimate cultural divisions in the world. Most of them are arbitrarily created, not only by political and financial elites, but also by the useful idiots and mindless acolytes infesting the sullied halls of academia.
It is perhaps no mistake that cultural Marxists in the form of "social justice warriors", PC busybodies and feminists tend to create artificial divisions between people and classes while attacking and homogenizing very real and natural divisions between individuals based on biological reality and inherent genetic and psychological ability. This is what cultural Marxists do: divide and conquer or homogenize and conquer, whatever the situation happens to call for.
They do this most commonly by designated arbitrary "victim status" to various classes, thus dividing them from each other based on how "oppressed" they supposedly are. The less statistically prominent a particular group is (less represented in a job field, media, education, population, etc.) in any western society based on their color, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, etc., generally the more victim group status is afforded to them by...."
- Feel no shame
- Do not self-censor
- Realize there is no such thing as white privilege or male privilege
- Demand facts to back claims
- Do not play the game of "unconscious bias"
- Let cultural Marxists know their fears and feelings do not matter
- Demand that society respect your inherent individual rights
- Maintain your rights; they do not hurt other people
- Refuse to deny the scientific fact of biological gender
- Deny the illusion of Utopian equality
- If you are a man, embrace your role
- Home-school your children
(Excerpt) Read more at alt-market.com ...
Obama's impeachable actions are incredibly vast and yet . . . . crickets from congress -
I just call the useful idiots. Saves the pain of having to explain.
“...Home School Your Children...”
This is so important maybe it should have been first. The government schools have successfully molded the up and coming generations and taught them how to groupthink since the 1960’s. Ironically they think they are the non conformists. It is laughable if not so dangerous for the country.
Home schooling the young unfortunately isolates and “ghettoizes” the young to a certain degree. Some say this is good, but an entire alternative school system that teaches the classics (including non Keynesian economics) and critical thinking would work as well but difficult to implement.
Home schooling is an OK solution though at some point the socialization needs to occur; albeit a socialization where the group is based on understanding the correct foundation vs. the pseudo utopian crap they are being indoctrinated with now in the government schools.
Yep, this author IS bright.
Reilly formulated 4 principles of Conducting a War of Ideas:
About number 4, Reilly noted that for more than a generation, Madrassas in Kashmir were teaching their students violent action, before it was put into action; once the indoctrination was in place, violence was on auto-pilot.
About number 2, Reilly, who is currently working on a book about our heritage, notes that, in its time, for a span of 200 years, the American revolution had captured the world's imagination with a vividness that easily outshines what ISIS proposes (kill Americans, a failure, ISIS fighters kill Muslims almost exclusively; get chicks, better success on this front, propaganda could portray them as undesireable; be important, here it's easier to show ISIS recruits they won't be important, that they'll be at the mercy of their leaders.)
We pulled them out 5 years ago. I met one of my son’s teachers and could tell who she was. Single, yet knows better than the parents, talked to me like I was a child. During that year, they put up black iron fence and heavy doors, making the place look like a prison. This was fairly rural and never had a safety issue and already had a 6’ perimeter fence with gates they could close. The next year my wife took them to their first day and she came home crying. Couldn’t stand their new teachers, who were more of the same and had talked down to her. That first day was their last day.
"Home schooling is an OK solution though at some point the socialization needs to occur; albeit a socialization where the group is based on understanding the correct foundation vs. the pseudo utopian crap they are being indoctrinated with now in the government schools."
We've been concentrating on the threee Rs but will be expanding this year. They are lacking in socialization yet we get nothing but compliments about how polite and well behaved they are around other people when we do get out. They actually say May I and Thank You. They're not shy or awkward. They're just not hyper and unruly, until they start playing with the other kids maybe. They do have the ability to swap into kid mode.
We've been using the Robinson Curriculum which requires minimal financial and time input on the parents part and the book list is the classics. We've been mixing in newer stuff because they were starting to talk funny. (who actually says "I shan't" LOL)
I think we're going to finish out the school year with some history, government, elections, socialism and maybe a little Critical Theory; the origins of and current useage. I'm sure they've learned quite a bit already because I get my news from the internet and relay it verbally to my wife and the kids ask about whatever they don't understand.
ARG! I'm fighting a losing battle on this I know. But gender is a grammatical term.
"Sex" is biological.
There can be numerous genders (male, female, neuter).
There are only two sexes. Liberals switched the naming on purpose.
“...are lacking in socialization...”
You are one hundred percent correct that having “failed” to absorb the current horrendous rude zeitgeist that currently passes for socialization in this day and age is far from a “lacking”, it is an asset!
You are to be commended highly!!
However, I think I was trying to picture that wouldn’t it be nice if there was a way that enough like minded families could allow them to have social/academic experiences in small amounts outside of the home setting when they are a bit older because it can be fun for tweens to be together when learning, preferably gender separated, of course outside the immediate “nest”. This probably already does occur in homeschooling groups.
Just a thought on an ideal because (having raised 4) pre teens and teens inherently crave a bit of healthy separate from Mom and Dad time in the right setting that hardly exists anymore.
Again, the homeschoolers are NOT missing out on what is considered “socialization”. I call it the Disney clones ‘tween rudeness. My daughters were not allowed to watch the then “Lizzie” McGuire type shows - then the Miley Cyrus one and it does help some - mine were not rude and did not have the practically universal ‘tude.
Then they all copy the gestures, facial expressions in real life and lose their individual identities. Observe the pre teens and see that this does happen. It is even worse now that they all copy each other via instagram.
I also think the hyper is due to Disney - my granddaughter (soon 3) is allowed to watch sparingly the Disney shows geared for the young toddlers and it disturbing to watch with her how fast the scenes change in seconds increments. There is no doubt in my mind that absorbing this day in and day out blows their little minds into a hyper mess.
Again your approach sounds awesome! Lucky kids! Classics!
I heard someone say (Dobson? MacArthur?) that we're not raising children, we're raising adults. (Too many in our society are raising children, which is why they continue to live in mom's basement, play video games all night , and sleep all day.) If you want kids to learn to become adults, it helps for them to spend more time around adults and less around large masses of feral brats.
When I think of what Disney used to be, and compare that to what it is now, I get ill, and angry. Disney in the 50s and early 60s was wonderful, inspiring, clean, patriotic, and pursed positive messages. The difference—Walt Disney, on the one hand, and the Michael Eisner Hollywood types on the other.
They wanted Disney not just for the brand, which was indeed valuable, but for the perverse please of turning it into yet another tool to push a liberal agenda.
“...Disney...tool to push the liberal agenda...”
Yes exactly. In fact no TV watching/video/netflix/etc. (all of it actually) ought to make it on the list for stamping out cultural Marxism.
Now that I think about, refusing to consume Marxist media does need to be added as an important bullet on the list. Maybe he addresses this later on - I didn’t have time to read the whole thing just the excerpt. Yes - alas mea culpa I admit to that Freeper weakness of commenting without full reading sometimes ...
FIFY
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.