Posted on 04/16/2016 8:15:17 PM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
So you win the state and the loser ends up more delegates, really. This is disgusting and disturbing.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
OK, I’ve got it. And I actually do appreciate your sometimes slightly cryptic remarks even if we do view this election from different perspectives.
Thanks :-)
Don’t make me vomit.
You left it to me to point out the pattern that you either are incapable or unwilling to see.
“But I say that in a kind and respectful way.”:
As “kind and respectful” as the way Cruz treated this girl?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3413956/posts?page=181#155
Never mind the text; don’t miss the video clip at the bottom.
Olofosh.
“If it is a corrupt system, it has been that way for over 250 years.”
Perhaps you are unaware that drooling leftist idiots are not welcome here. Certainly no one else would say such a moronic thing.
“Caucuses have been around for as long as this country has had a constitution.”
You have no idea what has been around for how long. Not only are you under the impression that the Constitution was ratified more than 250 years ago, you actually think the political process has been corrupt for that long.
“Nothing wrong with them.”
What a leftist does when he runs across a proposition he doesn’t like but can’t rebut is to restate it as something he thinks he can rebut, take a shot at the substitute proposition, then pretend that he has rebutted the original proposition.
In this case, seminar poster Bobby_Taxpayer took the proposition that insiders have rigged caucuses to deny voters a voice, which is self-evident, and by restating it is pretending that people are complaining about the caucus system itself. He is equating a corrupt caucus system with an honest caucus system, then Alinskying people for complaining about an honest caucus system when they never did.
Do you know the difference between a liberal and a Satanist? A Satanist knows who he’s working for.
“One has to be a voter in that district, county or state to cast a vote in a caucus just as in an election.”
In an honest caucus. In a dishonest caucus, all but the self-appointed elite are excluded. You don’t want people to understand that these caucuses were dishonest.
“So if a voter feels disenfranchised, why didn’t they go to the caucus?”
Because they were unable to discover when and where they were held. I know. I tried. Stop pretending that honesty and dishonesty are equivalent. Although, to be fair, I wouldn’t expect a liberal to be able to distinguish between the two.
“Let’s stop misleading the truth.”
Did you write that last part yourself? I wonder if the truth has a consciousness that can be misled. If so, it is certainly the left that would mislead it.
“Voters are LAZY in this country!”
Expecting other Americans to be honest is lazy? Perhaps in a universe in which a liberal expects all to be as corrupt as his own heart.
We both agree that this election cycle has been stranger than fiction. :) There will be a mini-series I’m sure.
I didn’t think I could become any more cynical about politics than I already am...but by gosh...I have.
O.K....I gotta know.
What is olofosh? I’m scared to google it, lol.
It must be of great comfort to you to miss the point entirely.
It is not the Rules, state to state, or even the RNC Rules.
It is about fraud.
TRUMP delegates are rejected and replaced. Even TRUMP’s “earned delegates”, are rejected and replaced with Cruz supporters.
Cruz’ entire campaign is high centered, on fraud.
The state outcomes, the margin of popular votes for TRUMP over Cruz, or even where no votes of the people are permitted at all, the TRUMP delegates are rejected by the bosses in the county, district and state level.
Now it is understood by all Americans that there is no democracy. Cruz worked the insider game, and TRUMP exposed the insider game.
So, which side of democracy do you want to be found on— on the side of the party apparatus/machine, or of the people, by the people and for the people?
The people have already chosen their nominee.
Good luck, sport, defending the indefensible with brain pudding as your argument.
Well said. Excellent!
Counter arguments don’t even pass the smell test and not worth responding to blowhard comments.
This can happen to a citizen candidate. Why wouldn’t it?
Americans are generally astounded to now learn the same as TRUMP, that elections have nothing to do with the people or their vote.
You may win sweepingly in twice as many states as your opponent, and you may earn the vast majority of the people, and their vote, coast to coast, and you may sweep the delegates in those states that you have earned, by your great victory.
You go to a convention and your victories are meaningless, your delegates were rejected and replaced with those of your opponent and you LOSE.
The American voter has been awakened, on both sides of the aisle. They are pissed.
Nobody wants to be you. To have to make your defense for fraud is one sorry argument to have to make. Nobody wants to die on that hill that sneers at democracy.
As always a marine, you voted for a CANADIAN citizen as an AMERICAN President, that’s very strange, hmmm !!!
That reminds me of another marine, judge Carter who promised hearing Soetoro’s NBC on its merit!!!
Rota, I do believe sweepingly means something different to you and I.
Bless your heart you do try hard though.
Mr. Trump hasn’t won over 50% anywhere yet though he is likely to do so this week. He is unlikely to have over 50% in June. If he does get there he’ll have plenty of time to convince me to vote for him. If he doesn’t, well, he’ll have lost.
You talk like a man with a paper butt. Figure it out for yourself,you seem to be disengaged with reality.
Let’s see....
No content, No substance, only name calling, Trump supporter....
Yep, it all fits.
Ted’s our new and improved Tricky Dick. : )
That describes you,get off your high horse and off your knees.
“off your high horse and off your knees”
You seem confused.
Have you ever posted any substance.
(hint: BS is not in that category)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.