Posted on 03/24/2016 3:53:37 PM PDT by 20yearsofinternet
Link goes directly to picture of the article that's good enough to read.
FULL Disclosure: I'm not a Cruz supporter, but I hate this kind of sleaze and I'm hoping that we can put this to rest before it gets submitted 500 times.
The entire article is based off of the threat from a hoax "Anonymous" account on Twitter, which later turned out to be a RickRoll (all related tweets have since been deleted). I am pretty sure the "details" are actually lifted from replies to the original tweet, LOL. Since they're deleted, I can't be sure. Point being, it was all a hoax and there's nothing there at all, and that's what the article is based off of.
Anyway, just wanted to put it out there that it's typical NE trash, not one of their once-per-decade real bombshells.
Carry on with the War of the Wives. :)
(Excerpt) Read more at pbs.twimg.com ...
Yeah, Mrs. Cruz breakdown is clear to me now. As a woman I have been there. When I found out my spouse was cheating. I experienced an emotional mental breakdown of sorts. Then you boot him out get on with life and get a divorce. Been on my own all these years & raised two sons.
Sure reads that way, “allegedly” this, “rumored” that.etc....
I’m sorry but kudos to you for being an awesome mom!
I think Katrina is the one who left Cruz; don’t think Cruz fired her
She worked on his senate campaign. She was not asked to participate in his presidential campaign.
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/ted-cruz-sex-scandal-mistresses-cheating-claims/
Link to the actual National Enquirer article...
>> If Conservative Treehouse is “covering” it then you can be guaranteed it is a lie <<
You beat me to it!
I agree. Why is this necessary?
During holy week? Really? how shameful.
I believe your comment here tells exactly what is happening with all this irrationality.
Congratulations on making a life for yourself and your sons and not letting it destroy you or them!
Then the NE would be in for a huge lawsuit. Which I highly doubt they would risk in light of the Gawker settlement.
How do you know his faith is shaky? Geez... only God knows what is truly in a man’s heart. Have you forgotten what Jesus said to those who were going to stone the adulteress?
Yeah, Mrs. Cruz breakdown is clear to me now.
Good for you for getting away from someone who didn’t appreciate you and was dragging you down. Not worth it!!
Maybe Mrs Cruz’s emotional state was temporary. She looks to me like someone who either is on medication or has some sort of mental issues going on. It’s in her eyes. I took care of several fosters with schizophrenia and mood disorders. I have seen that look before.
Actually, my link is to a picture of the full article. Your link is to a teaser telling people to buy the print copy.
The “That National Enquirer” tends to get their stuff right when it’s high profile people. They know where the legal lines are... They were the first to expose John Edwards, his mistress and child. Most of the newspaper knew about it but covered for him because he was a democrat.
The Enquirer plowed ahead -and with pictures.
Cruz does this all the time—sneaky. *Men of God* are not sneaky.
Where were you when the Cruz supporters were reading the hearts of Trump and his supporters in relation to their faith in God. While I agree only God knows what is in one’s heart, shouldn’t that apply to all not just Cruz?
So that qualifies you as a psychiatrist? Let’s see the medical degree. I can clearly understand why good qualified candidates never run for president. Having your family members dragged through the mud would be very painful. Seeing all the alleged salacious details of your private life commented on by people who have never met you yet feel qualified to diagnose you with a mental illness. Despicable.
After Gawker’s 175 million dollars pay out, no way would National Enquirer run with the story, unless they had some pretty impressive evidence.
“Actually, my link is to a picture of the full article. Your link is to a teaser telling people to buy the print copy.”
I believe your link was to an article about the article and the link on that article doesn’t work...so, to add validity to your post I added the link to the actual article...don’t have to buy it to verify it...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.