Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Navy Adds 4 New Ship Classes to Its Roster
Fox Business ^ | November 27, 2015 | Rich Smith

Posted on 11/30/2015 7:53:37 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

So long,Littoral Combat Ship. We hardly knew ye.

Lockheed Martin's USS Freedom (LCS 1) was the Navy's first littoral combat ship. New vessels of the same basic shape and size will henceforth be dubbed "frigates."

Say goodbye to the "Mobile Landing Platform," the "Afloat Forward Staging Base," and the "Joint High Speed Vessel," as well. As of this year, the United States Navy has done away with all four of these clumsy, elongated, ad hoc ship classes, replaced each with a new name -- and introduced a new theme for U.S. war-planning in the process. Henceforth, LCSes will be christened as "frigates," while the other three classes morph into Expeditionary Transfer Docks, Expeditionary Mobile Bases, and Expeditionary Fast Transports, respectively.

So in a word, the U.S. Navy of the future is going to look a whole lot more "expeditionary." This has implications for U.S. foreign policymakers, for its warship-makers -- and for those of us who invest in them as well....

(Excerpt) Read more at foxbusiness.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: boondoggle; military; navy; pos; specialforces; wasteofmoney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Mariner

Why waste all that weight and bulk for armor when it can be used for missiles and radar?>>>>
sounds like the design of the j zeroes.


21 posted on 12/01/2015 12:08:14 AM PST by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone Commentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
All the acronyms and letter designations DOD can come up with won't replace "Target" in my humble (ground bound and air delivered) opinion.

Another description might be "good ideas gone bad" except that it would only apply to the original LCS concept.

22 posted on 12/01/2015 12:22:13 AM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twister881

A bit of trivia: Name the only ship on the active roster to sink an enemy ship.


23 posted on 12/01/2015 3:20:56 AM PST by Vermont Lt (I had student debt. It came from a bank. Not from the Govt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

USS Constitution?


24 posted on 12/01/2015 3:23:25 AM PST by N. Theknow (Kennedys-Can't drive, can't ski, can't fly, can't skipper a boat-But they know what's best for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: N. Theknow

Probably. Every WWII ship has long since retired, and USN hasn’t done much ship sinking since then. USN airpower sank a frigate, and USN ships sank a gunboat in Operation Praying Mantis. Those ships have all been decommissioned.


25 posted on 12/01/2015 3:41:18 AM PST by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: phormer phrog phlyer

This is where things get confusing. Some Navy’s use the term “frigate” for a coastal vessel. The USN used to use the term “Destroyer Escort” for ocean-going escort ships, but changed to “frigate” during the Knox-class (or possibly the earlier Brooke-class). I believe that the Knox was originally designated hull “DE-1052”.


26 posted on 12/01/2015 4:19:19 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Gotta be Old Ironsides, USS Constitution ;-)


27 posted on 12/01/2015 4:27:03 AM PST by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: twister881

ding ding.....

We have a winner.


28 posted on 12/01/2015 4:33:29 AM PST by Vermont Lt (I had student debt. It came from a bank. Not from the Govt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

But it’s “only” the Constitution because the FFG USS Simpson, which sank an Iranian missile boat during Praying Mantis, was decommissioned a little over two months ago ...


29 posted on 12/01/2015 5:18:00 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

The Knox class and some predecessors (Garcia class) started as DEs.

They were reclassed as Frigates (FFs) in the 1970s to align our ship classifications to what the rest of NATO and the rest of the world was using for similar ships.

Calling the upgraded LCSs “Frigates” isn’t really all that much of a stretch. It’s just that “frigate” is such a generic term these days. The upgraded LCSs will be on the lower end of the scale, but still within the overall range.


30 posted on 12/01/2015 5:23:45 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

USS Constitution.


31 posted on 12/01/2015 5:34:08 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ ("It gets late early around here..." Yogi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

That’s bad... Shower shoes don’t cut it in that situation. I had to boot up. As for the cake dryer, I’m not sure. I was only on for three months before they dropped us off in the ME. I felt bad for the ship’s crew. They def had their work cut out for them.


32 posted on 12/01/2015 5:49:04 AM PST by patro (Phrogs Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

Yeah, I read that too.

I just think it is telling that in a Navy as strong as ours, sea battles are a thing of the distant past. At least for now.

And to have to go back to the War of 1812...I don’t know if this should make me happy that we are so strong, or that traditional naval power might not be relevant.

Clearly, projection of power is relevant. And I supposed if we tangled with China, the story would change.


33 posted on 12/01/2015 6:07:27 AM PST by Vermont Lt (I had student debt. It came from a bank. Not from the Govt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Well, the Varyag _is_ called a “Navy Cross waiting to happen” in some circles...


34 posted on 12/01/2015 6:15:35 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe; Jeff Head

Ping


35 posted on 12/01/2015 1:44:15 PM PST by StoneWall Brigade (MARANATHA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneWall Brigade; twister881; Jeff Head

Twister pretty much stated what is going on in post 8. We have fewer ships and this is an attempt to make it seem on paper that we have ships with capabilities of other classes. Truth is they are shrinking fleet size overall and just like the rest of the armed forces programs deliberately destroying the ones that did work. http://www.history.navy.mil/research/histories/ship-histories/us-ship-force-levels.html This is the bottom line they wish to confuse with new designations. Granted some ships do need a new classification where one did not exist before. Put in this case it’s putting ribbon on a pig and calling it a poodle. Nothing wrong with either one if you recognize it for what it is. In this case though it isn’t.


36 posted on 12/01/2015 3:44:24 PM PST by cva66snipe ((Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson